La Fábula de Polifemo y Galatea - La Fábula de Polifemo y Galatea

La Fábula de Polifemo va Galatea (Polifem va Galateya haqidagi ertak), yoki oddiygina Polifemo, ispan shoiri tomonidan yozilgan adabiy asar Luis de Gongora va Argote. She'r, garchi yunon va rim tillarining oldingi adabiy manbalaridan juda ko'p qarz olgan bo'lsa ham Antik davr, rivoyat tarkibini qayta tuzish orqali afsonaning belgilangan versiyalaridan tashqariga chiqishga urinishlar Ovid. Yuqori darajadagi innovatsion she'riy uslublarni singdirish orqali Gongora fon voqealarini samarali ravishda ilgari suradi Acis va Galatea Ning oshiqligi, shuningdek, hasadgo'ylik Tsikloplar Polifem.

The Polifemo 1613 yilda qo'lyozma shaklida to'ldirilgan va keyinchalik Gongora vafotidan keyin 1627 yilda nashr etilgan (qarang) 1627 she'riyatda ). Asar an'anaviy ravishda Góngoraning eng yuksak she'riy ishlaridan biri sifatida qaraladi va shubhasiz uning eng yaxshi badiiy yutug'i va Soledades. The Polifemo, yakuniy bosqichni amalga oshiradi Gongora Ijodi davomida asta-sekin rivojlanib borgan murakkab she'riy uslubi. Ga qo'shimcha ravishda Soledades va boshqa keyingi asarlar Polifemo deb nomlanuvchi Góngoraning yuqori urg'u, bilim va taassurot qoldiruvchi she'riy uslubining to'liq hajmini namoyish etadi culteranismo.

She'rning ochilishida ko'rinib turganidek, Polifemo grafiga bag'ishlangan edi Niebla, 17-asr Ispaniyaning eng taniqli rassomlarining saxiy homiyligi bilan mashhur bo'lgan Kastiliya zodagonlari.^[1] Asarning asosiy mavzusi, rashk va raqobat Gongora kabi 17-asr shoirlarini badiiy ixtirochilikni rivojlantirish va namoyish etishga undagan haqiqiy raqobat muhiti va dunyoviy intilishlarni aks ettiradi. Gongora yozgan Polifemo sharafiga Luis Karillo va Sotomayor "s Fabula de Acis va Galatea, bu xuddi shu mifologik hisobni tasvirlaydigan zamonaviy she'r edi. Bundan tashqari, Carillo y Sotomayor she'ri xuddi o'sha Nibla grafiga bag'ishlangan edi. Luis Karrillo va Sotomayor ham Gonoroning do'sti, ham Gongoradan uch yil oldin, 1610 yilda 27 yoshida vafot etgan hamkasbi "kulteranist" shoir edi. Polifemo yakunlandi. Umidli o'quvchining bevaqt o'limi ma'lum ma'noda Polifemoning yaratilishiga turtki bo'ldi.

Oddiy cheklovlar; The Polifemo va Ispaniya barokida she'riy ozodlik

The Polifemo uzunligi, floristik uslubi va o'ziga xos jihatlari bilan Gongora uchun misli ko'rilmagan ingenio (badiiy ixtiro yoki yangilik). Adabiy shakliga kelsak, she'rda ko'rsatilgan vositachilik badiiy ravshanligidan befarq bo'lmagan tarzda rivojlanadi. Aristotel Ning She'riyat^[2]

Luis Karrillo va Sotomayor kabi zamonaviy tanqidchilar bularni ko'rish uchun kelishadi Aristotelian badiiy jihatdan bo'g'uvchi kabi ko'rsatmalar. Uning ichida Libro de la Erudición Poética, Karillo aniqlik va ravshanlikni rasmiy ravishda qoralaydi, ayniqsa, bunday badiiy ideallar "o'zini yarim ma'lumotli kishilarga tushunarli" qilish uchun she'riy ifoda parametrlarini qo'yganida. ^[3] Garchi karteroning o'limidan keyin kulteranizm ushbu elita va aristokratik sifatni yaxshi saqlagan bo'lsa-da, Gongora shogirdining mag'rur ko'rinadigan sharhi aslida Góngoraning ashaddiy tanqidchilarining jibasi edi, uning davriy vitrioli rassom va uning ishini obro'sizlantirishga intildi. Dastlab badiiy ravshanlik, tushunarlilik, lirika, yangilik va erkin fikr o'rtasidagi ushbu asosiy bahs She'riyat Arastu va avlodlar adabiy doiralarida munozaralar zamonaviy davr mobaynida rassomlarni ikkiga bo'lishni hech qachon to'xtatmaydi. Kulteranismo, ayniqsa, o'ynoqi qorong'ilikni yaxshi ko'rar edi, shuning uchun tanqidchilar beparvo va pedantik deb nomlangan liberal badiiy qarashlari uchun bir nechta tanqidchilarning nafratlanishiga olib keldi.^[4]

Ning ustunligi ingenio qadimiylardan kelib chiqqan she'riy me'yorlarning qat'iy estetik asoslarini o'rnatish orqali instinktni yumshatishga intilgan an'anaviy auditoriya tanqidchilarining da'volariga zid bo'lib, tinglovchilar yoki o'quvchi bilan yanada izchil dialog o'rnatish uchun. Kabi tanqidchilar Xuan Martines de Juregi va Agilar va Frantsisko de Quevedo, ularning tushunarsiz lirikasi bilan bog'liq sabablarga ko'ra ko'rdim culternanist she'riy vositachilikni yuqori darajada bezakli frazeologiya bilan yashirish niyatida juda ta'sirlangan, yuzaki va maqsadga muvofiq ravishda yashiringan shoirlar.^[5]

Uning uslubiga qarshi qanday ayblovlar qo'yilganidan qat'iy nazar, Gongora shoirning eng nufuzli shoirlaridan biri bo'lib qoladi Ispaniyalik barokko va o'z navbatida uning eng g'arazli tanqidchilarining uslublariga ham ta'sir ko'rsatishi mumkin edi.^[6] Da ko'rsatilgan murakkab metaforalar Polifemo keyinchalik ilhom beradi Frantsuz simvolikalari kabi Pol Verlayn^[7] kabi zamonaviy ispan shoirlari kabi Federiko Gartsiya Lorka va boshqa a'zolari '27 avlodi. Culteranismo asrlar davomida har doim yuqori darajadagi ashaddiy va ezoterik xususiyatni saqlab kelgan va bu oxir-oqibat boshqa 20-asr modernist shoirlarining she'riyatiga xos mistik nostalgiya haqida ma'lumot beradi. Bilan birga kontseptsiya, culteranismo asosan aniqlangan Ispaniya barokko she'riyati. Culteranismo, 17-asr badiiy harakati sifatida, poklikni ko'tarishga intildi ingenio ning idealidan imitatio (Badiiy taqlidning lotincha atamasi), hukmronlik qilgan tendentsiya Uyg'onish davri she'riyat (qarang reklama shriftlari ). Noaniqligi culternanistlar asrlar davomida ko'proq konservativ ispan shoirlari va mutafakkirlarining tanqidiga uchragan bo'lar edi.

Uchastkaning qisqacha mazmuni va tahlili

The Polifemo 63 misradan iborat bo'lib, ularning har biri jami 8 satrdan iborat. To'liq holda Polifemo 504 qatordan iborat. She'r davomida she'riy yozishmalar (masalan, organik yoki ichki havola) juda ko'p, ular abstrus sifati bilan keskin farq qiladi. kultizmlar (ya'ni juda o'ziga xos lingvistik modifikatsiyalar, klassik leksika va ilmiy ma'lumotnomalar) o'zlari. Bundan tashqari, asarning bezakliligi va tafsilotlari klassik simvolizmdan va tashqi havoladan (ya'ni tegishli mifologik hisoblar orqali etkazilgan) ko'p foydalanish bilan yanada murakkablashadi. metafora va latifalar ). A kultizmgarchi ko'pincha kulteranizmning ma'lum bir namoyishi uchun soyabon atamasi sifatida intuitiv bo'lsa ham, badiiy ifoda uchun oddiy tilning aniqligidan voz kechadigan she'riy vosita sifatida qaralishi mumkin. She'r ichida parallellik, mutanosiblik, dissonans va murakkab qator jumboq ikkalasini ham o'z ichiga oladi o'xshashlik va antiteziya shuningdek, she'rga klassik o'tmishdoshlariga qaraganda ancha murakkablik baxsh etadi.

Ochilish (Niebla homiysiga bag'ishlanish) - Stanzas 1-3

Sitsiliya muzasining aniq chaqirilishi Taliya qadimiylik va pastoral janrni nishonlaydi. Bundan tashqari, ushbu kirish yunon tilini o'z ichiga oladi muz ta'kidlaydi ingenio o'zini qoidalar bilan belgilab qo'yilgan va taxminlar bilan belgilanadigan ko'proq ibtidoiy taqlidga nisbatan. Imitatio (qadimgi insonlar san'atiga hurmat bilan taqlid qilish) Uyg'onish davri she'riyatida juda ta'sirli ispan shoiri oyatida ko'rinib turganidek keng tarqalgan Garcilaso de la Vega u o'z navbatida italiyalikdan katta miqdorda qarz oldi Dolce Stil Novo kabi shoirlar Petrarka, 14 va 15 asrlar she'riyatida inqilob qilgan.

G'or va Polifemo olami - Stanzas 4-12

Ga xos bo'lgan tinch va idealizatsiya qilingan parametrlardan farqli o'laroq pastoral Góngora janrning o'zgaruvchan fonini - old fon dinamikasini saqlab turadi Polifemo, bu she'rning boshida o'zini namoyon qiladi. Uning mo'l-ko'l ishlatilishidan tashqari, ixcham va o'ziga xos metaforalarga bo'lgan mehrini hisobga olgan holda hiperbaton, lirik she'riyatning sifati asl rivoyatning barcha jihatlarini tanitadi va qayta tuzadi (qarang) ostranenie ). Qarama-qarshiliklar, antiteziya va dissimilyatsiya mavjudligi, estetik kontsentratsiyaning etishmasligini va an'anaviy Aristotelda zarur deb topilgan nuqsonli rivoyat birligini aks ettiradi. estetika. Buning o'rniga Gongora qarama-qarshi go'zallik va xunuklik, uyg'unlik va kelishmovchilik tasvirlarini yonma-yon qo'yadi ikkilamchi ning erotik sevgi ham samarali, ham halokatli.

Noxush odam va melankolik bilan pastroq Uyg'onish idealidan chetga chiqadi, bu chegaralarni belgilash orqali shakllarni ajratib turadi, ya'ni markaziy ob'ektlar yoki raqamlar boshqa narsalarning ustunligini o'zgartirgan oldingi va orqa fonlarni belgilaydi. Uyg'onish san'ati ichida yuqori daraja mavjud germetik fokus, konsentratsiya va shaklning barqarorligi. Zichligi va teksturasi kattaroq bo'lgan shakllarga ustunlik beradigan "chegaralarni klassik belgilashdan farqli o'laroq", barokko uslubi "ko'zda tutilgan raqam" va "istalmagan fon" yoki apeirion o'rtasidagi bo'linishlarni "vahiyda" foydasiga echishga intildi. "shakl va yorug'lik va rangning sirli o'zaro oqimi.".^[8]

Stran ovi Aranjesda Xuan Bautista Martines del Mazo tomonidan (1665)

Gongora tasvirida Polifemo manzaralari va obrazlari tasvirlarning o'zi diqqat markaziga aylanadi va o'zlarining mavjudligini oladi. Endi ular kelib chiqadigan narsalarga bo'ysunadigan xususiyatlar mavjud emas. Endi talab qilinadigan shaklni bo'ysundirish mavjud emas Uyg'onish san'ati. Buning o'rniga Barok ko'pincha bunday farqlarning buzilishi va ushbu o'rnatilgan ideallarning buzilishi bilan tavsiflanadi. Barokko tasviriy san'atida bo'lgani kabi, Polifemo ichida ham osongina tanib bo'ladigan shakllarning etishmasligi mavjud. O'z navbatida, bu yangi xabardorlik va shaklni qadrlash o'zida uchun asosiy badiiy tashvishga aylandi culteranists, G'arbni nishonlagan va shu bilan birga tanqid qilgan bir guruh fikrlovchi shoirlar Gumanist va Hermeneutik bu davr an'analari.

Raqamlari Polifemo o'zlari ko'pincha metaforik tavsiflari, latifasi va o'zlari aralashgan vaziyat yoki bevosita atrof-muhit tasviri bilan ajralib turadi. Kontekstida Barok estetikasi, bu ma'noda depersonalizatsiya - bu ajralib turadigan shaxs sifatida shaxsdan butunlay voz kechish yoki yomonlashish emas, aksincha bu belgilarning o'zlari shakllari sifatida asoslanishiga urg'u beradi. Ob'ektiv shaxs ham hodisalar qatori, ham umumiy tasvirning bir tomoni sifatida mavjud. Aksincha, bu badiiy tajribaning yakuniy hakami bo'lgan sub'ekt, ammo ular faqat individual in'ikoslar to'plamini va xususiy uyushmalarni aks ettirish bilan cheklangan. Ushbu tushunchadan foydalanib, Polifem va uning g'ori o'rtasidagi farq endi ahamiyatsiz deb hisoblanmaydi, chunki ikkalasi o'rtasida hamdardlik mavjud.

Ushbu shakllarning barchasi birinchi darajali ahamiyatga ega bo'lgan estetik maqsadga xizmat qiladi, chunki Gongora umumiy hikoyani ishlab chiqishga va qo'shishga intilgan melankolik intilish va e'tiborsizlik tuyg'usini qamrab oladi. Oxir oqibat aynan shu shoir o'zaro qarama-qarshilikni orkestrator sifatida narsalarning o'xshashligi va umumiyligidan tashqariga chiqib, qarindoshlarni tasavvur qilish va loyihalash uchun harakat qiladi. iroda. Ushbu son o'xshashlik Ikki alohida mavjudot o'rtasida paydo bo'ladigan doimiy hamdardlik tushunchasi XVI asrda chuqur ildiz otgan g'oya edi epistémè, kabi Mishel Fuko juda ta'sirli ishida fosh qiladi Les Mots va Les Choses.^[9]

Galatea tasvirlangan - Stanzas 13-17

Gongora Galateyani butun Sitsiliya oroli hayratga soladigan va unga sig'inadigan ilhom sifatida tasvirlaydi. U Sitsiliya aholisi ongi va marosimlarida uni ilohiylashtirishga davom etmoqda. Uning ayolligi, orolning barcha aholisi uchun mislsiz ilhom manbai va "yaxshi" bo'lib qolmoqda (summum bonus ), yakuniy ta'qib va ​​istakning yagona ob'ekti. Ayol go'zalligi va inoyatining muqaddasligi oxir-oqibat paydo bo'lgan Galatea kultiga olib keladi.

Sitsiliya ta'rifi - 18-24

Sitsiliya, ertakning sozlanishi klassik arxetipga o'xshaydi Arkadiya. Bu Polifem g'orining qorong'iligi bilan keskin farq qiladi. Barokko san'atida aksincha Uyg'onish davri san'atidan ko'ra ziddiyatlar yoki kelishmovchiliklar ishlatilgan. Enrica Cancelliere o'zining "Dibujo y Color en la fabula de Polifemo y Galatea" maqolasida ta'kidlaganidek, vizual va she'riy rassomlar o'rtasida mavjud bo'lgan estetik qiziqishlarning umumiyligi ko'pincha Barok davrida juda ajoyib edi:

Dentro de la epoca barroca que imtiyozlari va todas las artes partir de la técnica del claroscuro en pintura, este poema ya desde el título Fábula de Polifemo y Galatea pone de reeve re el el tema del kontrasti cromático, el choque entre ob resplandeciente; un poema escrito, pues, según la técnica del claroscuro. Así Dámaso Alonso quyidagilarni yozadi: «De un lado lo lóbrego, man monstruoso, lo de mal augurio, lo áspero, lo jayanesco; de otro, lilio y plata, lo albo, lo cristalino, lo dulce, la belleza mortal. Tema de Polifemo; Galataa tema ». Esta radikal técnica pictórica, que en España toma el nombre de tenebrismo, traduce también signalados alegóricos, antropológicos y simbólicos: vida-muerte, Eros-Thánatos, gracia-perdición, que légargar hasta elán temar elastar elastar elastar elastar con juegos de luces y sombras que de la escena pasarán al verso y del verso a la escena. Si en los polos hallamos los límites de la escala cromática —el blanco y el negro -, ichki makon, el cuadro tushuntirishlar manchas de color vividas, oximóricas, que a través de sus signalados simbólicos construyen imágenes, personajes, paisajes, sentimi emotsionlar.^[11]

G'arbiy tarixning boshqa davrlariga qaraganda ko'proq rasmda ziddiyatlardan mo'l-ko'l foydalanishni afzal ko'rgan Barokko davrida yozilgan asar bo'lib, Polifem va Galateya haqidagi ertak xromatik qarama-qarshiliklar, to'qnashuvlar haqida aynan shu mavzuni o'z zimmasiga oladi. zulmat va yorqinlik o'rtasida. She'r tasviriy san'atda ko'riladigan chiaroscuro uslubiga o'xshash uslub bilan yozilgan. Damaso Alonso yozganidek: "Bir tomonda dahshatli, oldindan bashorat qiluvchi, ishonchli, grotesk bilan birga keladigan bu g'amgin mavjudot mavjud; shu bilan birga, qimmatbaho narsalar mavjud gul va eng toza kumush, beg'ubor, kristalli, shirin, o'lmas va chiroyli. Bizda bor narsa, Polifem va Galateyaning tegishli sohalari. " Ispaniyada tenebrismo deb nomlangan ushbu radikal texnika tasvirlangan belgilar va ramzlar shaklida ham allegorik darajada qo'llaniladi: hayot-o'lim, Cupid-Thanatos, inoyat-halokat, bularning barchasi Kalderon teatrida qayta tiklanadi. ular tushunarli shaklni egallaydilar, ular sahnadan oyatga oyatdan sahnaga o'tadigan yorug'lik va soya o'yinlari bilan uyg'unlikni keltirib chiqaradilar. Agar biz qutblarda oq va qora rangdagi xromatik o'lchov chegaralarini topsak, interyerda rasm yorqin rangdagi dog'lar bilan portlab, asosiy ramziy ma'nolar yordamida butun tasvirlarni, belgilarni, sozlamalarni yaratadigan oksimoronikgacha eriydi. , fikrlar va his-tuyg'ular.

Aziz Petrni rad etish Caravaggio tomonidan (taxminan 1610)

Antiteziya bilan bog'liq bo'lgan bu she'riy tendentsiya va bilan bir vaqtda Chiaroscuro 17-asrda G'arb rassomligida pishib yetilgan uslub. She'rning hayratlanarli kontrasti Polifemoning zulmat, g'amgin va og'ir yukdagi hayotini yorug'lik, go'zallik va mamnuniyat paragenti Galatea qiyofasi bilan birlashtirib turadi.

Acis tavsifi va sevuvchilarning uchrashuvi - Stanza 25

Gongora she'riyatining klassik manbaga oid qiziqarli nisbati - bu shaxsning nasabnomasi orqali murojaat qilishi. Ikki sovg'aning ilohiy nasablari, mumtoz asarlar ichida keng tarqalganligi masalasi she'rga kiritilgan.

Ikkala sevgilining uchrashuvi va uchrashish - Stanzas 26-37

Ushbu satrlarda Acis Galateyani o'zining tsikloptik raqibiga qaraganda boshqacha yondashuv bilan ta'qib qilmoqda. Jon Makkav "Ko'zi ojizga aylanish: jinsiy raqobat, o'ziga xos noan'anaviylik va Gongora's Fabula de Polifemo y Galatea" dagi pastoralning kuchsizligi "asarida Acisning uyg'unlashuv stratagemasi Galateya shahvoniyligi bilan shug'ullanganligini va Polifemoning" tafakkur sevgisi "ustidan g'alaba qozonganligini tasdiqlaydi.^[12] Acis o'zining xohishini hashamatli moddiy qurbonliklar orqali ifoda etib, eski butparastlik amaliyotiga ishora qilmoqda Anatema, shuningdek transandantal bo'lmagan aralashmagan "erotik ehtiros" va shu sababli, intellektualga qarshi.

Sevuvchilarning fikri - Stanzas 38-42

Ushbu misralarda Galatea ideal sifatida erishib bo'lmaydigan xarakterga ega (qarang) Platon idealizmi ) aniq qilingan:

"Más agradable y menos zahareña,

Al mancebo levanta venturoso,

Dulce ya concediéndole y risueña

Sueño, treguas si al reposo kabi qadamlar.

Lo cóncavo hacia de una pena

Un fresco sitial dosel umbroso,

Y verdes celosías unas hiedras,

Trepando troncos y abrazando piedras. ”

«Dastlabki zarbadan so'ng Galatea biroz do'stona va kamroq kirishib ketadi. U omadli yigitni oyoqqa turg'azadi; shirin va tabassum bilan, u endi tinchlikka emas, balki tinchlik berishga tayyor, lekin haqiqatan ham sulhning tinchlanishiga imkon beradi, ya'ni uni istisno qilmasdan, keyinroq qoldiradi. Bo'shliq tosh, yashil panjur bo'lib xizmat qiladigan, magistral atrofida ko'tarilib, toshlarni quchoqlagan salqin, mehmondo'st mehmonlar uchun soyali qopqoqni hosil qiladi. "

(Miroslav Jon Xanak tomonidan inglizcha nasriy tarjima^[13])

Cyclops qo'shig'i - Stanzas 43-58

Acis-dan farqli o'laroq, Polyphemus muvaffaqiyatsiz o'z-o'zini etishtirishni, tabiatdan farqli o'laroq konventsiyani va fazilatlarning samarasiz qo'llanilishini anglatadi. neo-platonik yuqoriga qarab rivojlanish, nafosat, go'zallik va umuminsoniy totuvlikni ta'kidlaydigan fikr^[14] Odatdagidan farqli o'laroq burlesk Polyphemus va Galatea (Teokritda ko'rinib turganidek) tasvirlari, Gongora sikloplarining so'zlari uning tashqi qiyofasi va uning mohiyatiga mos kelmaydi. vahshiylik. Aql-idrokka e'tibor, dialektik yoki qadimiy ratsionalizm Aristofanlar satirik tarzda "fikrlash" (Phrontisterion - dan Bulutlar ) shuningdek axloqiy va tanadagi korrupsiyaga qarshi hushyorlik bunga yo'l topadigan neo-platonik tushunchaning markazidir. bukolik eng kam ehtimol belgilar orqali landshaft. She'r davomida Tsiklopsning ko'zlari an'anaviy bo'lgan quyosh bilan ajralib turadi Apollon beparvo haqiqat yoki ma'rifat uchun belgi. Cyclops o'zining surrogat go'zalligini nutq va qo'shiq shaklida anglaydi, uni sevgilining aniq go'zalligi bilan taqqoslaydi.

Polifem uning xiralashganligidan kelib chiqadigan "Kikloplar qo'shig'i" tarkibida. Uning abadiy azob-uqubatlari va tinimsiz sog'inchlari uning lirikasini boshqaradi. Aynan uning holati orqali uning san'ati paydo bo'ladi.

Kanselye she'rning vizual dinamikasini tekshirishda ta'kidlaganidek, Polifemo xarakterida mujassam bo'lgan ibtidoiy zulmatning o'zi hamma idrok yoki taraqqiyotning takrorlanadigan beshigi va qabri bo'lib tuyuladi:

La noche se muda en posibilidad de regeneración y no solamente por la topología uterina del antro sino por el vuelco mismo de la calidad cromática, connotando el negro, la ausencia absoluta de color, una infinita posibilidad receptiva y regeneradora se Campo deif espera que nazcan otra vez la luz, los colores, la profundidad, las apariciones, en fin, la caverna esotérica, sea de Platón, sea de los antiguos ritos iniciáticos y de los misterios.^[16]

Kechasi bo'shliqda qayta aniqlash yoki qayta tiklanish imkoniyatini mamnuniyat bilan qabul qiladi va bu shunchaki uning botiqligi, uning to'ldirilishi iltimos qilinadigan bachadon topologiyasi orqali emas, balki birinchi navbatda aynan shu xromatik o'lchovda yuzaga keladigan tabiiy ag'darilish yordamida mumkin, rangni, rangning mutlaq yo'qligini, cheksiz qabul qiluvchi va tiklanadigan imkoniyatni birlashtirgan: chuqurlik va shaklning yorug'ligi, hayotning takroran tug'ilishini kutish mumkin bo'lgan imkoniyatlar doirasi va pirovardida ezoterik g'or Aflotun, o'sha qadimiy marosimlar va uzoq vaqtlar unutilgan sirlar.

Sevishganlar Acisni kashf etdilar, o'limi va o'zgarishi - Stanzas 59-63

Gongora va Ovid versiyalarida she'rning oxiri zo'ravonlik va o'zgarishlardan iborat. Ikkala ertakda ham Cyclops nola qilganidan so'ng, ikki sevishgan kashf etiladi va shu bilan qochib ketayotgan Polifemning g'azabi paydo bo'ladi. Acis u manzaradan yirtib tashlagan tosh bilan. Lotin tilida ham, ispancha she'rda ham yosh Acis Polifemning ajoyib toshi bilan ezilib o'ldiriladi. Faqat zo'ravon o'limdan keyin bola keyinchalik daryoga aylanadi.

Fon, klassik kashshoflari Polifemo va she'riy yangilik

Mifologik belgilarning o'zi turli xil pre-Ellistik kabi manbalar "Odisseya" ning 9-kitobi, afsonaviy sevishganlar sinovining har tomonlama badiiy namoyishi, Polifemning rad etilishi va natijada tanazzulga uchrashi va keyinchalik Acisning o'ldirilishi ancha kechroq amalga oshirildi. OvidMetamorfozalar.

Shunga qaramay, Ovid ushbu afsonaviy shaxslarning she'riy salohiyatidan foydalangan birinchi shoir emas edi. Garchi uning ushbu she'rga ta'siri kamroq bo'lsa ham, asoschisi bukolik yoki pastoral janr, Theokrit, Polifemni va unga bo'lgan beg'ubor sevgisini aks ettiruvchi burlesk she'rini yozgan Dengiz nimfasi Galateya. Cho'ponlik janri, ko'rinib turganidek, keyinchalik antik davrning boshqa taniqli shaxslari tomonidan taqlid qilinishi kerak edi Virgil Ning Ekologlar, shuningdek, italyan va ispan tillarining taniqli arboblari tomonidan Uyg'onish davri, kabi Petrarka va Garcilaso de la Vega.

Theokrit, Ovid va Gongorada "Kikloplar qo'shiqlari" turli darajalarda bir-biriga o'xshashdir. Gongora versiyasi uchun asos bo'lib xizmat qilgan ikkita mumtoz she'r, Tsikloplarning Galateyani chaqirishi bilan ajralib turadi, bu ham taxminiy, ham iflos ohangni saqlaydi. Klassik kelib chiqishning ba'zi umumiy xususiyatlari:

1. Theokrit va Ovidda Polifem Galateyaning jismoniy go'zalligi va alusivligini tabiiy va pastoral hodisalar bilan taqqoslaydi. Polifemning nolasi, uni rad etganligi va natijada umidsizlikka uchraganligi bilan ajralib turadi. Theokritda "Polifemning to'rtta taqqoslashi qishloq xo'jaligi va chorvachilikning kundalik faoliyati bilan bog'liq bo'lib, shunga qaramay, bu sikloplarning soddaligi bilan ajralib turadi".^[17] Aksincha, Góngora Polifemani o'zining ashaddiy qiyofasi, turmush tarzi va xudbinlik / antisosial kayfiyatiga qaramay, chuqur she'riy va murakkab tasvirlaydi.
2. Uning uchta she'rida ham uning jozibali jismoniy qiyofasi tasvirlangan. Gongora qo'shig'i yanada nozikroq va Ovidida topilgan burlesk komediyasidan ongli ravishda qochadi.
3. Polifem o'zining nasl-nasabini yoki moddiy boyligini uchta she'rida ham sanab o'tadi.
4. Polifem Galateyani u bilan birga bo'lishga maslahat beradi.

Theokritning versiyasi yosh Tsiklopning o'zini tanbehlari bilan tugaydi. Bundan tashqari, ohang beg'ubor va kulgili, boshqa muhabbatga umid qolmoqda.

Boshqa taqlid va shunga o'xshash asarlar mavjud bo'lsa-da, Gongora uchun asosiy ilhom, shubhasiz, ertakni metamorfozlarning ajralmas kontseptsiyasi mavzusiga mos ravishda tasvirlaydigan Ovid edi.

Hikoya tuzilishi Ovidning versiyasida topilganidan ancha farq qilsa-da, Gongora xuddi shunday syujetni Tsiklopsning Acisni o'ldirishi va keyinchalik yosh bolani o'zgartirishi bilan bog'laydi. Garchi Ovidning faoliyati bu uchun tematik va bayoniy asos bo'lib xizmat qiladi Polifemo, Góngora shunchaki Ovidiga taqlid qilish bilan kifoyalanmaydi. Ikki shoirning orzu-istaklari ajralib turar edi. Metamorfozlarni yozishda Ovid doimiy transformatsiya mavzusi bilan birlashtirilgan afsonaviy vaqt haqida hikoya tuzishga intildi. Ovidning maqsadi kosmologik xarakterga ega. Ispaniyalik shoir o'zining keskin qarama-qarshi uslubi va qadimiy shoirning rivoyat tuzilishidan aniq og'ishini hisobga olgan holda, o'zining mashhur aql-idrokini namoyish etish uchun keng parametrlarni va o'ziga xos estetik sezgirlikni ta'minlaydigan ushbu mashhur afsonani qayta ko'rib chiqishga urinadi. Rim she'rida.

Ovidian tasviridan va Gongorine innovatsiyasidan chetga chiqish

Polifemoni oldingisidan ajratib turadigan tarkib jihatidan bir nechta sezilarli farqlar mavjud. Melinda Eva Lerer o'z asarida ta'kidlaganidek Klassik afsona va Gongoraning "Polifemo" si, “Gongora Oviddan meros qilib olgan afsonada ko'plab yangiliklarni amalga oshirdi. Ulardan ba'zilari shunchaki dekorativ funktsiyaga ega, boshqalari esa Gongora she'ri uchun organik ahamiyatga ega. "^[18]

Rivoyatni kamaytiradigan bir nechta bezak qo'shimchalari mavjud, ular uning klassik hamkasbida mavjud emas:

Bundan tashqari, Leher ta'kidlaganidek, boyligi va serhosilligini namoyish qilganda:^[19]

Tsikloplarning uy-ro'zg'or buyumlariga hayot baxsh etuvchi bezak tasvirlaridan tashqari, Gongora ko'pincha 50-53 avliyo kemalarida halokatga uchragan ceneviz savdogarlari haqida umumiy rivoyatlariga putur etkazadigan latifalarni o'z ichiga oladi.

Gongora oyatining tematik yakkalanishi uning og'zaki iqtisodiyotini qadrlaydigan uning sof kontseptsiya zamondoshlari bilan keskin farq qiladi. yozishmalar va haqiqiy vasiyat sifatida so'zlar (alomatlar) va ularning ma'nolari (ko'rsatgichlari) o'rtasidagi ozroq o'zaro bog'liqlik aql-idrok, ular o'z navbatida tematik diqqatni jalb qilish uchun foydalanganlar. Gongora voqealarni hikoya orqali berilgan hissiy taassurotlarga qaratib qayta tiklaydi. Oldindan tuzilgan abstraktlar va prozaik leksika va iboralarga murojaat qilish yoki ularga tayanishni istamaslik o'quvchini ma'noni qayta tiklashga majbur qiladi. Uning juda sezgir lirikasi va o'quvchining tushunchasini to'g'ridan-to'g'ri jalb qilish yoki joylashtirishni istamasligini hisobga olgan holda, adabiyotshunoslar, masalan Damaso Alonso, Góngoraning uslubini ayniqsa taassurot qoldiradigan deb belgilagan.^[20]

Acisni o'ldirish: oldindan rejalashtirilgan va ehtiros jinoyati

Gongoraning salafi Ovid Acisning qotilligini oldindan rejalashtirilgan harakat sifatida tasvirlaydi:

"Xo'sh, u bularning hammasi uchun o'zini mamnun qilishi mumkin, lekin menga yoqmaydigan narsa, u Seni rozi qiladi, Galatea - meni yigitga ijozat ber, u mening bo'yim qanchalik kuchli ekanimni bilib oladi! Men uning tirik ichaklarini yirtib tashlayman va uning tana qismlarini dalalarga va sizning suvlaringizga sochib tashlayman, shunda siz uning oyoqlari bilan aralashishingiz mumkin. ”10 (Tarjima Bk. XIII Metamorfozlar ln. 1249-1259)

Ovididan farqli o'laroq, Gongora Polifemning bunday hisoblash va sovuqqonlik bilan tasvirlanishini tanlamaydi va buning o'rniga chinakam sadoqatli sikloplarning sustligini ta'kidlaydi, chunki u tasodifan ikkala sevishganni birga ushlaydi:

Ushbu asosiy farq Gongoraning shaklga bo'lgan asosiy tashvishini va uning sevgi, rashk va qotillikning hissiy oqimlarini aks ettirish orqali to'liq estetik ta'sirga ega bo'lish tashvishidan dalolat beradi. Stiven Vagshal "Mas no cabrás allá" da: Gongoraning Zamonaviy Sublime-ning zamonaviy zamonaviy vakili "da ta'kidlashicha, Gongora bu bilan estetik xususiyatni to'liq namoyish etadi. ulug'vor, kabi Kant dinamikani yuqori darajadagi muqarrarligi hikoyaning eng yuqori cho'qqisida sodir bo'ladigan joyda belgilab qo'ydi. Xiyonatning vahiysi tabiatda tajribali yuqori darajadagi o'xshash taassurot bilan ta'kidlanadi. Ushbu taassurot zo'ravonlik, vayronagarchilik va tsikloplarning tabiiy holatiga to'liq o'tishi uchun kashfiyotchi hisoblanadi. Gongora, asosan, insonning his-tuyg'ularini tabiatning tegishli halokatli tomoni bilan aralashtirib, hasadgo'ylik tushunchasini to'liq darajada surib qo'yadi.

Polifemo doirasida chirkinlik va groteskning mavjudligi, pastoralning Arkadiya manzarasini bezatadi, chorvachilik soddaligiga xos bo'lgan go'zallik va uyg'unlikni yo'q qilishni oldindan belgilab qo'ygan, bu Uyg'onish davri san'atida ham, qadimiy bukolikada ham qadrlangan edi.^[22] Sevimli va seviklilar o'rtasidagi uyg'un va samarali munosabatlar iloji boricha saqlanib qoladigan jannatda ham sevgi hech qachon bo'shliqda shakllanmaydi va yashamaydi va buning o'rniga doimiy haqiqat tomonidan sinovdan o'tkaziladi va o'zgartiriladi. Sevgi oxir-oqibat nomutanosiblik holatiga kiradi, bu erda ham tashqi holat, ham hissiyotning instinktiv beqarorligi asl shaklni birgalikda o'zgartiradi. Sevgining bepushtligi va yovuzlikning mavjudligi, natijada beparvolik yaxshi haddan tashqari va yovuzlik johiliyat mahsulidir, bu esa to'g'ri ta'lim bilan samarali ravishda yaxshilanishi mumkin bo'lgan Suqrot tomonidan vujudga kelgan nasroniy bo'lmagan butparast axloqqa chuqur ildiz otgan. Yovuzlik - bu o'ta deterministik dunyoqarash orqali qabul qilinadigan holat, bu yahudiy-nasroniylarning tushuntirishlari bilan keskin farq qiladi. yovuzlikning mavjudligi. Instead of relying upon a preexisting cosmological force and the doctrine of Asl gunoh, the pagans offered a much more rational explanation that rested in the philosophical categorization that delineated the good. All conditions contrary to this understanding were in a sense flawed to various extents (see Nichomean Ethics ).

The beauty of Galatea: The material vs. the transcendental

Within pre-Christian texts the portrayal of Galatea differs drastically from that of early modern depictions. Certain recurrent images present in Ovid and Theocritus that seem to be avoided altogether in Renaissance and Baroque poems are the mundane associations that pertain to her femininity. Ga binoan Ignasi Ribó, when emphasizing the blancura or “whiteness” of Galatea, Theocritus and Ovid both utilize the metaphor of milk. In fact, etymologically Galatea can be translated to mean “milk-white.” Nevertheless, within the context of Góngora's poem a reference or metaphor to milk does not occur. Given that Góngora was fully aware of this, it is interesting that he consciously choose to filter this image out of his Polifemo. Ribó notes that Góngora opts instead for other representations of feminine beauty that appeal to the platonic or Marian yoki Beatricean abstraction of femininity. Some examples are, “más brillante que el cristal” (brighter than cristal) and “más luciente que el hielo” (more translucent than ice). Ribó believes that this transposition of feminine ideal corresponds to the neo-platonic tradition that became exceedingly popular in the later stages of Roman antiquity. These philosophical trends undoubtedly allowed for the gradual Christianization of the empire. Ribó would elaborate that medieval Christianity greatly shaped European perceptions and taste placing parameters on those of even the most avid of Humanists during the Renaissance.

Character portrayals: Galatea

Ovid seems to represent Galatea as entirely helpless and passive as she laments over the brutality of Polyphemus:

“One day, Galatea, spreading her hair for Ssilla to comb, heaved a sigh and said: “You, dear girl, are pursued by the kind of men you would hardly consider uncouth, and you can say no to them, as you do, without a second thought. But consider my case: My father is Nereus; my mother, sea-blue Doris; and I have a group of sisters who protect me; yet I was unable to escape the love of a Cyclops without suffering for it,” and her voice choked with sobs. The girl wiped away Galatea’s tears with a hand white as marble and consoled her, saying, “Tell me about it, dearest, don’t hide your sorrow- you can trust me.”

(Ovid Book XIII of the Metamorphoses ln 742–749. English Translation by Michael Simpson)

Within the Polifemo, Galatea transgresses the established gender roles that were rigidly maintained particularly in 17th century Spain. Góngora places Galatea in a much different light by having her assume a more sexually assertive role. Her shamelessly unrestrained behavior is distinct. Midway through the poem, there is a reversal between the role of the lover (Galatea) and the beloved (Acis). This inversion of the courtly poetry popular in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance in which women were confined to the role of the humble, reticent and inactive role of the beloved spars with the expectations of the 17th century reader.

Despite the sexual overtones of the poem, the Bucolic environment captures the Adamic or Pre-fall Edenik innocence of Western tradition, which effectively predicates the licentious and exploitative associations with human sexuality. In this sense, the poem escapes the regular criticism so prevalent in Góngora's time. The bucolic genre effectively bypassed the social formalities, norms, taboos and concerns of posterior civilization.

Physical consummation of the lovers

Ovid is not so suggestive and does not note whether or not the love was consummated.

Meanwhile, Góngora makes this evident and limits the ambiguity of the extent of the brief relationship and by doing so Galatea substantiates her latent sexuality.

Temporal differences in the narrative

Ovid presents the tale as a recollection and incorporates it into other mythological accounts of transformation. His rendering of the tale portrays the act as something already experienced.

As stated by Leher, “Góngora is not interested in this story for the same reason as Ovid. Góngora was interested in this particular story for the contrasts, tensions, and resolutions of the forces which it offered, and his innovations and alterations were directed toward that purpose.”^[23] In sum, Góngora seeks to recreate the experience in order to capture the full aesthetic potential provided by the background narrative.

Other narrative differences

The eloquence of Polifemo's words as he serenades Galatea is particular to Góngora, which contrasts sharply with the grotesque and humorous classical portrayals of the barbarous Cyclops. Góngora chooses to exclude the image of the Cyclops raking (i.e. combing) his hair and other instances in which scrupulous attention is given to his physical appearance. In Ovid, this was used likewise for a humorous effect, which was inappropriate for the graver tone set by Góngora. There are several comedic elements to the ancient texts that were selectively discarded by Góngora.

A noticeable difference is in the discovery of the lovers. While in Ovid, the Cyclops stumbles upon them while he is roaming the countryside, Góngora has the discovery interrupt the song of the Cyclops as he is lamenting. As Lehrer goes on to state in her mythological analysis of the Polifemo, “interruption of a speaker is in fact a motif that occurs in Góngora’s Soledad Primera and suggests displacement and alienation. The interruption of Polifemo’s song resembles a “jog in timing which hastens the denouement of the poem.”^[19] Thus, while it does not deviate from the unfolding of the plot, it definitely elicits an aesthetic effect not present in its Roman predecessor.

The Polifemo and the Renaissance ideal

The question of perfection, of a harmonious situation where nothing can be added without worsening conditions for individuals and set relationships, drives the narrative of the Polifemo. Essentially, the poem exposits the implausibility of Arkadiya, of an ideal world, given the persistent problem of evil. It presents evil not as an unjustified primordial element independent of humankind, but as a corollary to the finite nature of the material universe. The nol sum metaphysical assumptions maintained throughout the narrative foment a pervasive sense of competition that prompt egocentric feelings of vanity and jealousy, which together predicate violence and destruction. At the same time, the Polifemo could be interpreted analogically as a commentary of the aesthetic and ethical systems of Gongora's time and place.

Beauty itself as a pleasurable distinction amid a multitude of phenomena can only be made sensible through the necessary existence of the outlying inferior qualities or distinct forms surrounding the object in focus. Beauty as a focused pursuit is reflected in the clear background-foreground distinctions characterizing Renaissance painting. By its scarce and exclusive nature, beauty becomes the unending pursuit or focus endowing the aspirant pursuer with a sense of purpose and meaning. These underlying values are reflected in the prevailing themes of Renaissance literature, particularly intangible beauty and harmonious idealization.

Presupposing the belief that the world resumes under a cyclic progression of infinite transformation, as propounded in the Metamorphoses of Ovid, the situation that originally gives rise to feelings such as love is likewise just as ephemeral or predisposed to change. Within the narrative, tension develops between this intractable and predetermined outlook characterizing Neo-Platonic thought and that of free will, personal accountability and the uniqueness of individual experiences. The very self-contained and immutable reality of things propounded during the height of the Renaissance, in which entities remained suspended in their particular web of semblances and associations, is portrayed as a specious and unavailing contraption or constraining dogma that thoroughly undermines Immanence and the Present by denigrating the very sensibility of phenomena. The poem has anti-intellectual undertones and seems to idealize pagan love as a contrast to both Polifemo's unavailing lamentations that mirror the courtly love poetry popular throughout both Medieval Christendom and the Early Renaissance in addition to the reemerging Platonic strains of thought.

In the Polifemo, the Arcadian world of bucolic poetry proves just as insecure as our^{[JSSV? ]} own. The world, as the subject experiences it, remains exposed to an array of hostile outside influences that impinge upon our most gratifying experiences. Whether through a direct or indirect capacity, the exterior world inevitably prompts a change in the present arrangement in the very same manner that originally allowed for the conditions at hand. Essentially, life as a continuum of contingent experiences reflects the doctrine of Heracletan oqim that greatly influenced the course of Western philosophy. This outlook begs on the part of the subject a reorientation of all outlying perceptions and ultimately renders all teleological equilibria as purely theoretical conceptions. In the midst of flux, the subject is made a victim of his or her circumstance.

The Polifemo reflects a change in the aesthetic and philosophical perceptions of 17th-century Europe. Though the poem does offer a critique of former metaphysical and artistic outlooks, the poem is thoroughly distinct in form. The aesthetic focus, for example, shifts towards the sublime and perhaps this is the most palpable distinction. The poetic style also reflects the prevalent sense of anxiety characterizing both the Barok period and the historical context of the Qarama-islohot. The liberal use of hyperbaton, antiteziya, arcane classical allusions, abstruse metaphors and intricate witticisms mark a genuine distinction from Renaissance poetry (see Evfuizm, Culteranismo, Marinismo, Preciosité ). During this period, there seems to be^{[kimga ko'ra? ]} an unprecedented focus on artistic form, which is a rather zamonaviy preoccupation.

The injustice experienced on a personal level, of change and of loss, offers a different rendition of what is theorized on the plane of remote abstraction. This is perhaps one reason that can explain the anti-intellectual tone maintained throughout the poem. In the face of destruction and suffering, Gongora portrays life as being ultimately redeemed by the sensorial experience of life itself. Pleasure is realized in its absence and full appreciation develops as a result of its loss. Thus, beauty and ugliness, tranquility and turmoil allow for one another, making life sensible through their contrasts. What an experience does not entail allows for the intellection of its reality. Consequently, this understanding would in turn merit a deep appreciation for reality and all it entails, particularly during the artistic process. This novel outlook could explain the fixation with contrasts present throughout Gongora's other works.

During the early 17th century, several scientific and cultural breakthroughs were being made that greatly reshaped Western cosmological perceptions. It seems that Gongora's work reflects this period enmeshed in social upheaval, lingering spiritual doubts and a pervasive feeling of instability. In contrast to the courtly poetry of the Renaissance, the love of Acis and Galatea as portrayed by Gongora is grounded in the innocence of physical attraction, something which had been traditionally marginalized throughout the Middle Ages and Early Renaissance. The actual degeneration of pagan sensibility is rooted in the metaphysical hierarchies of Neoplatonism and its populist successor, Nasroniylik. Sensualism in poetry had always been harangued by Church officials particularly during the Renaissance when there was a renewed interest in Pagan culture. This was understandable given that the literature of antiquity clearly possessed a distinctive ethos that at times drastically opposed the rigid moral standards later established by the Church. The Polifemo ultimately represents the redeeming aspect of love as it arises from and is consequently destroyed by the inscrutable primordial chaos that gives form to passion. The poem celebrates Butparastlik muhabbati as described by Robert Jammes and conversely criticizes the intellectualism that needlessly justifies and consequently stifles erotic love.

Shuningdek qarang

• 1613 yil she'riyatda

Izohlar

Adabiyotlar

• Baena, Julio. "Tiempo Pasado y Tiempo Presente: De la Presencia a la estereofonia en la Fabula de Polifemo y Galatea." Caliope: Journal of the Society for Renaissance & Baroque Hispanic Poetry 2.1 (1996): 79-99.
• Barnard, Mary E. "The Gaze and the Mirror: Vision, Desire, and Identity in Gongora's Fabula de Polifemo y Galatea." Caliope: Journal of the Society for Renaissance & Baroque Hispanic Poetry 8.1 (2002): 69-85.
• Cancelliere, Enrica. "Dibujo y Color en La Fabula de Polifemo Y Galatea." Asociación Internacional de Hispanistas Actas X (1989): 789-798.
• Carenas, Francisco. "El Lenguaje, ese oscuro y enigmatico objeto: El Caso de El Polifemo de Gongora." Letras de Deusto 20.48 (Sept. 1990): 151-159.
• Dolan, Kathleen H. “Figure and Ground: Concrete Mysticism in Gongora’s ‘Fabula de Polifemo y Galatea’.” Ispancha sharh 52.2 (Spring, 1984): 223-232.
• Friedman, Edward H. "Creative Space: Ideologies of Discourse in Gongora's Polifemo." Cultural Authority in Golden Age Spain. 57-78. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP, 1995.
• Garcia, Luis M. Vicente. "El lenguaje hermetico en la Fabula de Polifemo y Galatea de Gongora." Edad de Oro 23 (2004): 435-455.
• Hanak, Miroslav John. The Fable of Polyphemus and Galatea. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 1988.
• Lehrer, Melinda Eve. Classical Myth and the ‘Polifemo’ of Gongora. Potomac, MD: Scripta Humanistica, 1989.
• McCaw, John R. “Turning a Blind Eye: Sexual Competition, Self-Contradiction, and the Importance of Pastoral in Góngora's ‘Fábula de Polifemo y Galatea’.” Hispanofila 127 (September 1999): 27-35.
• O'Connor, Thomas Austin. "Sobre el Bozo de Acis: Una Apostilla a los Versos 279-280 del Polifemo de Gongora." Boletin de la Biblioteca de Menendez Pelayo 68 (1992): 143-148.
• Pabst, Walter. Translation by Nicolas Marin. La Creación Gongorina En Los Poemas Polifemo Y Soledades. Imprenta Aguirre: Madrid, 1966.
• Parker, Alexander A. Polyphemus and Galatea: A Study in the Interpretation of a Baroque Poem. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1977.
• Raulston, Stephen B. "Vision, Desire, and the Reader of the Polifemo." Lucero: A Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies 1 (Spring 1990): 17-27.
• Ribó Labastida, Ignasi. “Galatea o la leche. La descripción de la belleza femenina en Teócrito, Ovidio y Góngora.” Revista de Literatura Española Medieval y del Renacimiento 10 (2006).
• Ricapito, Joseph V. "Galatea's Fall and the Inner Dynamics of Gongora's Fabula de Polifemo y Galatea." Women in the Discourse of Early Modern Spain 160-180. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 2003.
• Ruster, Michael Bradburn. "Fabula de Polifonia: Harmony and Discord in Gongora's Polifemo." Lucero: A Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies (Spring 1991): 112-119.
• Simpson, Michael. The Metamorphoses of Ovid. Amherst, MA: Massachusets universiteti matbuoti, 2001.
• Wagschal, Steven. "Mas no cabrás allá": Góngora's Early Modern Representation of the Modern Sublime.” Ispancha sharh 70.2 (Spring, 2002): 169-189.