Lotin zamonlari - Latin tenses

Lotin grammatikachilari odatda lotin tilini oltita asosiy narsa sifatida taqdim etishadi zamonlar, uchta mukammal bo'lmagan yoki infektsiya zamonlar (hozirgi, kelajak va nomukammal) va uchta mos keladigan mukammal yoki mukammal zamonlar (mukammal, kelajak mukammal va pluperfect).^[1] Ushbu olti zamon ikki xil o'zak yordamida yasalgan: masalan, fe'ldan faciō "Men qilaman" uchta mukammal bo'lmagan vaqt faciō, faciam, faciēbam va uchta mukammal zamon fēcī, fēcerō, fēceram.

Indikativ kayfiyatning ushbu oltita vaqtidan tashqari, subjunktiv kayfiyatda to'rtta zamon mavjud: hozirgi, nomukammal, mukammal va pluperfect (faciam, facerem, fēcerim, fēcissem). Bularga kelasi zamon va fe'lning bir qismidan iborat bo'lgan har xil 'perifrastik' zamonlarni qo'shish mumkin sum, masalan fakt summasi "Men qilmoqchiman".^[2]

Lotin og'zaki guruhlarida mukammal inglizcha ekvivalentlar mavjud emasligi sababli, ko'pincha bitta so'zni o'z mazmuniga qarab turli xil tarjima qilish mumkin: masalan, faciō "men qildim", "men qilaman" va "men qilyapman" va kabi tarjima qilinishi mumkin fēcī "Men qildim" va "Men qildim" deb tarjima qilinishi mumkin.^[3] Biroq, vaqti-vaqti bilan lotin tilida ingliz tilida farq qilmaydigan farq bor: masalan, fuī va eram ikkalasi ham ingliz tilida "men edim" degan ma'noni anglatadi, ammo ular lotin tilida farq qiladi (bu farq ispan va portugal tillarida ham mavjud).

Lotin tilidagi ishtirokchilar uchta zamonga ega (hozirgi, mukammal va kelajakda) va imperativ kayfiyatda ikki zamon mavjud (hozirgi va kelajak). Infinitiv ikkita asosiy zamonga ega (hozirgi va mukammal) va xabar qilingan nutqda ishlatiladigan bir qator perifrastik zamonlar.

Ko'pincha lotin tilida zamonlardan foydalanish to'g'ri, ammo lotin va ingliz tillarida turli xil zamonlardan foydalaniladigan ba'zi bir iboralar mavjud.^[4] Masalan, "agar biror narsa bo'lsa, men sizga aytaman" turidagi kelgusi sharoitlarda ingliz tili ergash gapda hozirgi zamonni ishlatadi, ammo lotin tilida kelajakdagi mukammal zamon mavjud ("agar biror narsa sodir bo'lsa, men sizga aytaman" ).

Ba'zi hollarda zamonlardan foydalanishni bir zamon yoki kayfiyatning boshqasiga aylanishi, ayniqsa bilvosita nutqida tushunish mumkin. Masalan, bilvosita savollarda to'g'ridan-to'g'ri nutqning hozirgi ko'rsatkichi, masalan est 'is', avval indikativdan subjunktiv kayfiyatga o'zgartiriladi (o'tirish), so'ngra, agar kontekst o'tmish bo'lsa, hozirgi kundan nomukammal vaqtgacha (esset). Yana bir keng tarqalgan transformatsiya - bilvosita bayonotdagi asosiy fe'l infinitivning eng yaqin zamoniga o'zgarishi, hozirgi zamon. est hozirgi infinitivga o'zgaradi esseva nomukammal erat "u edi" va mukammal edi fitna "u" har ikkisi ham mukammal infinitivga aylandi xushbichim.

Vaqtlarning shakllanishi

Lotin tilida indikativ kayfiyatda oltita, subjunktiv kayfiyatda to'rtta asosiy vaqt mavjud. Ular quyida 1-konjugatsiya fe'lidan foydalanib tasvirlangan, amō "Men sevaman", 2-chi konjugatsiya fe'l moneō "Men maslahat beraman", 3-chi konjugatsiya fe'l, dūcō "Men rahbarlik qilaman" va 4-chi konjugatsiya fe'l, audiō 'Men eshitaman'.

Shuningdek, stolda oddiy tartibsiz fe'llarning zamonlari ko'rsatilgan sum "Men", possum "Men qodirman", volō "Men xohlayman" va eō 'Men boraman'.

	Hozir	Kelajak	Nomukammal	Zo'r	Future Perfect	Pluperfect
FAOL	Men sevaman	Men sevaman	Men sevardim	Men sevganman	Men sevgan bo'laman	Men sevgan edim
Men sen sg. u / u biz siz pl. ular	amō amas amat amamus amatis amant	amabi amabis amamit amambimus amabit amabunt	amam amabos amamat amambus amatis amabant	amavi amavistī amavit amamvimus amavistis amāvērunt / -ēre	amaverō amavaris amavarit amarvermus amāverītis amavertint	amevram amāverās amavarat amavaramus amatveris yaxshi
Subjunktiv	amem am amet amēmus amitis yaxshi		amarem amaris amoret amarimus amaritis amarent	amavarim amavaris amavarit amarvermus amāverītis amavertint		amā (vi) ssem amaslar amset amassumus amassitis amssent

Passiv	Meni sevishadi	Meni sevishadi	Men bo'ldim sevgan	Meni sevishdi	Menda bo'ladi sevib qolgan	Meni sevishgan
Indikativ	amor amaris amur amur amamin amantur	ambor amaberis amabitur amamimur amamiminī amabuntur	ambar amaris amabturur amambur amambini amabantur	amatus sum amatus es amatus est amati sumus amati estis amati sunt	amatus erō amatus eris amatus eritiladi amati erimus amati eritis xato qilmoq	amatus eram amatus eras amatus erat amati eramus amati eratis amant erant
Subjunktiv	amer amēris amtur amēmur amēminī amentur		amer amaris amuritur amurumur amarēminī amārentur	amatus sim amatus sīs amatus o'tirish amati sīmus amati sisis amati sint		amatus essem amatus esses amatus esset amātī essēmus amātis essis mohiyatli

FAOL	Men maslahat beraman	Men maslahat beraman	Men maslahat berayotgandim	Men maslahat berdim	Menda bo'ladi maslahat berdi	Men maslahat bergan edim
Indikativ	moneō mons monet monēmus monit monent	monēbō monēbis monēbit monēbimus monobit monēbunt	monēbam monēbās monēbat monēbamus monibotis bir xil	monuī monuistī monuit monuimus monuistis monuērunt / -ēre	monuerō monuerīs monuerit monuerīmus monuerītis monuerint	monueram monueras monuerat monueramus monueratis monuerant
Subjunktiv	moneam moneas moneat moneamus moneatis moneant		monērem monērēs monēret monērēmus monērētis monentli	monuerim monuerīs monuerit monuerīmus monuerītis monuerint		monuissem monuisslar monuisset monuissēmus monuissētis monuissent

Passiv	Menga maslahat berishadi	Men bo'laman maslahat berdi	Men bo'ldim maslahat berdi	Menga maslahat berishdi	Menda bo'ladi maslahat berildi	Men edim maslahat berdi
Indikativ	moneor monis montur monumur monēminī monēntur	monobor monēberis monēbitur monēbimur monēbiminī monēbuntur	monēbar monarbar monēbātur monēbāmur monēbāminī monēbantur	monitus sum monitus es monitus est monitī sumus monitī estis monitī sunt	monitus erō monitus eris monitus eritiladi monitī erimus monitī eritis bekor qilish	monitus eram monitus erās monitus erat monitī erāmus monitī erātis monitī erant
Subjunktiv	monear monearis moneatur monemur moneāminī moneantur		moner monērēris monērētur monērēmur monērēminī monērentur	monitus sim monitus sīs monitus o'tirish monitī sīmus monitī sītis monit sint		monitus essem monitus essēs monitus esset monitī essēmus monitī essētis monitī mohiyat

FAOL	Men rahbarlik qilaman	Men rahbarlik qilaman	Men etakchi edim	Men rahbarlik qildim	Men rahbarlik qilgan bo'laman	Men rahbarlik qilgan edim
Indikativ	dūcō dūcis dūcit dūcimus ditsit dūcunt	dūcam dūcēs dūcet dūcēmus dūcētis kamaygan	dūcēbam dūcēbās dūcēbat dūcēbāmus dūcēbātis dūcēbant	dūxī dūxistī dūxit dūximus dūxistis dūxērunt / -ēre	dūxerō dūxerīs dūxerit dūxerīmus dūxerītis dūxerint	dxxeram dxxerās dūxerat dxxeramus dxxeratis dūxerant
Subjunktiv	dūcam dūcās dūcat dimamus dcatis mumkin emas		dūcerem dūcerēs dūceret dūcerēmus dūcerētis denterent	dūxerim dūxerīs dūxerit dūxerīmus dūxerītis dūxerint		dūxissem dūxissēs dūxisset dūxissēmus ūxissētis dississent

Passiv	Meni etaklaydilar	Menga rahbarlik qilinadi	Men bo'ldim LED	Meni olib borishdi	Menda bo'ladi olib borildi	Meni olib borishgan
Indikativ	dūcor dūceris dūcitur dūcimur dūciminī dūcuntur	dūcar dūcēris dūcētur dūcēmur dūcēminī dūcentur	dūcēbar dūcēbāris dūcēbātur dūcēbāmur dūcēbāminī dūcēbantur	kanal summasi ductus es ductus est ductī sumus ductī estis ductī sunt	ductus erō duktus eris duktus eritiladi ductī erimus dūctī eritis kanalni o'chirish	duktus eram ductus erās duktus erat ductī erāmus ductī erātis kanal
Subjunktiv	dūcar dācāris dāāatur dācāmur dūcāminī dūcantur		dūcerer dūcerēris dūcerētur dūcerēmur dūcerēminī dūcerentur	ductus sim ductus sīs ductus o'tirish ductī sīmus ductī sītis dukt sint		ductus essem ductus essēs ductus esset ductī essēmus ductī essētis ductī mohiyatli

FAOL	Men eshitaman	Men eshitaman	Men eshityapman	Eshitdim	Men eshitganman	Men eshitgan edim
Indikativ	audiō aud audit audīmus tinglash tinglovchi	audiam tinglovchilar tinglash audiēmus audiētis tinglovchi	audibam audiēbās audiēbat audiēbāmus audiēbātis juda yaxshi	audīvī audīstī audīvit audīvimus audistis audiērunt / -ēre	auditorō auditorlar auditorit audierīmus audierītis audierint	audieram auditorlar audierat audieramus audieratis auditor
Subjunktiv	audiam audias audiat audiamus audiotis tinglovchi		audīrem audīrēs audīret audīrēmus audīrētis auditor	audierim auditorlar auditorit audierīmus audierītis audierint		audīsem auduslar audetset musiqa audis ovoz

Passiv	Men eshitdim	Men eshitaman	Men bo'ldim eshitdim	Men eshitdim	Menda bo'ladi eshitildi	Men eshitgan edim
Indikativ	auditor audīris auditor audīmur audīminī audiuntur	audiar audiēris eshitish audiēmur audiminī audientur	audiēbar audiēbāris audiēbātur audiēbāmur audiēbāminī audiēbantur	sum sum tinglash tinglash est audītī sumus audītī estis audītī sunt	quloq soling odis eris tinglashingiz kerak audītī erimus tinglash kerak xato qilmoq	eshitish auditus erās eshitish audītī erāmus audītī erātis tinglash
Subjunktiv	audiar audiaris auditor audiamur audiāminī audiantur		auder audīrēris audīrētur audīrēmur audīrēminī audīrentur	sim sim audītus sīs o'tirish audītī sīmus audītī sītis audītī sint		audetus essem audītus esses tinglash audītī essēmus audītī essētis audītī mohiyatli

BOLMOQ	Men	Men bo'laman	Men edim	Men bo'ldim / bo'ldim	Men bo'ldim	Men edim
Indikativ	sum es est sumus estis sunt	erō eris eritiladi erimus eritis qochmoq	eram eras erat eramus eratis erant	fuī fuistī fitna fuimus fuistis fuērunt / fuēre	fuerō fuerīs fuerit fuerīmus fuerītis fuerint	fueram fueras fuerat fueramus fueratis fuerant
Subjunktiv	sim sīs o'tirish sīmus sis sint		esse esselar esset essmus essētis mohiyat	fuerim fuerīs fuerit fuerīmus fuerītis fuerint		fuissem fuissēs fuizet fuissēmus fuissētis fuissent

BOLMOQ Qodir	Men qodirman	Men qodir bo'laman	Men qodir edim	Qodir edim / qodir bo'lgan	Menda bo'ladi qodir edi	Men bunga qodir edim
Indikativ	possum idishlar kuchli possumus potestis egalik qilish	poterō poteris poterit poterimus poterit poterunt	poteram poteras poterat poteramus poteratis poterant	potuī potuistī kostyum potuimus potuistis potuērunt / -ēre	potuerō potuerlar potuerit potuerīmus potuerītis potuerint	potueram potueras potuerat potueramus potueratis qalbaki
Subjunktiv	ehtimol imkoniyatlari mulk imkoniyat mumkin egalik		egalik imkoniyatlari mulk imkoniyat mumkin ega bo'lish	potuerim potuerlar potuerit potuerīmus potuerītis potuerint		potuissem potuisslar potuisset potuissēmus potuissētis qudratli

XOHLASH	Men xohlardimki	Men xohlayman	Men xohlagan edim	Men xohladim	Men xohlagan bo'lardim	Men xohlagan edim
Indikativ	volō vīs vult volumus vultislar volunt	volam volēs volet volumus volis volent	volēbam volēbās volēbat volubamus volibotis volant	voluī voluistī iroda voluimus voluistis voluērunt / -ēre	voluerō ko'ngillilar voluerit voluerīmus voluerītis voluerint	volueram voluerās voluerat voluerāmus volueratis ko'ngilli
Subjunktiv	velim velīs yoqilgan velīmus veltis velint		vellem vellēs baxmal velmus velētis qichqiriq	voluerim ko'ngillilar voluerit voluerīmus voluerītis voluerint		voluissem voluissēs voluisset voluissēmus voluissētis ixtiyoriy

BORMOQ	Men boraman	Men boraman	Men ketayotgan edim	Men ketdim	Men ketdim	Men ketgan edim
Indikativ	eō .s u usmus bu xola	ōbō bis ībit bimus ībit untbunt	bam abas ībat ubamus abitis antbant	iī / īvī iistī iit iimus iistis iērunt / iēre	ierō ierīs ierit ierīmus ierītis ierint	ieram ieras ierat ieramus ieratis ierant
Subjunktiv	eam eās yemoq eamus eatis eant		īrem .rēs yaxshi ērēmus ērētis īrent	ierim ierīs ierit ierīmus ierītis ierint		.sem .s setsset Musiqa bu yuborilgan

Texnik tilda dastlabki uchta zamon infektsiya vaqtlari, uchta mukammal zamon sifatida tanilgan bo'lsa mukammal.^[5] Uchta mukammal zamon boshqa ildiz yordamida hosil qilingan (masalan. dūx- o'rniga dūc-).

Kelajak zamonlari

Lotin tilida kelasi zamonni shakllantirishning uchta usuli mavjud: (1) -bō, -bis, -bit (1-chi va 2-chi konjugatsiya va eō 'Men boraman'; (2) -am, -ēs, -et (3-chi va 4-chi konjugatsiya); va (3) erō, eris, erit (sum, absum, adsum, possum).

Kelajakdagi mukammal yakunlar

Lotin tilida kelajakka mukammal bo'lganlar qisqa edi men shaxslarda -eris, -erimus, -erit, mukammal bo'ysunuvchi uzoq vaqtga ega edi men: -erīs, -erīmus, -erītis. Ammo Katullus (va, ehtimol, Tsitseron, uning maromiga qarab) klausulae ) kelajakni mukammal i (vafēcerīmus).^[6] Virgilning kaliti bor men har ikkala zamon uchun ham; Horace ikkala zamon uchun ikkala shakldan foydalanadi; Ovid kelajak uchun mukammal, ammo uzoq vaqt uchun ikkala shakldan foydalanadi men mukammal ergash gapda.^[7]

Perfect passiv zamonlar

Zo'r zamon passivi perifrastik jihatdan mukammal kesim va fe'l yordamida hosil bo'ladi sum. Kesim jinsi va soniga qarab o'zgaradi: ducta est "u etakchilik qildi", ductae sunt '(ayollar) boshchiligida' va boshqalar. Deponent fe'llarning mukammal zamoni (masalan.) profektus summasi "Men yo'lga chiqdim") xuddi shu tarzda shakllanadi.

Ba’zan kesim va ko‘makchining tartibi almashtiriladi: sunt kanalī. Salbiy holatlarda turli xil imkoniyatlar mavjud: nōn est ausus, ausus nōn est, nōn ausus est "u jur'at eta olmadi" odatda hamma sodir bo'ladi.

Zo'r zamon passivining bir qismi sifatida ishlatilgan mukammal kesim quyidagi jumlaga o'xshab, faqat sifatdosh bo'lgan kishidan ajratilishi kerak:^[8]

Gallia est omnis dīvīsa qismning trīlarida (Qaysar)^[9]

"Galliya, umuman olganda, uch qismga bo'lingan"

Bu erda est dīvīsa "bo'lingan" yoki "bo'lingan" emas, lekin qism shunchaki tavsiflovchi xususiyatga ega.

Bilan qilingan mukammalliklar fuī va habuī

Vaqti-vaqti yordamida mukammal zamonlar ham shakllanishi mumkin fuī o'rniga sum, masalan oblītus fuī "Men unutdim" va habuī masalan. ductum habuī "Men rahbarlik qildim". Buning ma'nosi uchun quyida ko'rib chiqing.

Qisqartirilgan tugatish

2-shaxs singular passiv oxiri ko'pincha o'zgarib qisqartiriladi - bu ga -e, masalan. dūcēbāre uchun dūcēbāris "sizni olib ketayotgan edilar".

3-shaxs ko'plik mukammal ko'rsatkichi ham qisqartirilishi mumkin: dūxēre uchun dūxērunt "ular rahbarlik qildilar". Mukammalning qisqartirilgan shakli she'riyatda keng tarqalgan, ammo ba'zida nasrda ham uchraydi.

Indikativ zamonlarning ma'nolari

Hozirgi indikativ

Hozirgi zamonda jihatning farqi yo'q: faciō "men (hozir)", "men (muntazam ravishda) yoki" men qilyapman "degan ma'noni anglatishi mumkin; ya'ni mukammal, odatlangan yoki aspekt bo'yicha progressiv bo'lishi mumkin.

Hozirgi holat

Hozirgi zamon hozirgi holatga ishora qilishi mumkin:

senatus haec intellekt; kssul videt; hic tamen vīvit (Tsitseron)^[10]

'Senat buni tushunadi; konsul buni ko'radi; hali bu odam tirik "

tū fortasse vērum dīcis (Tsitseron)^[11]

"ehtimol siz haqiqatni aytayapsiz"

Odatiy

Hozirgi zamon odatdagi harakatlar uchun ishlatilishi mumkin:

videoō (fīlium tuum) ferē cotīdiē (Tsitseron)^[12]

"O'g'lingizni deyarli har kuni ko'ryapman"

Umumiy haqiqatlar

Hozir, ingliz tilida bo'lgani kabi, umumiy haqiqatni ham tasvirlab berishi mumkin:^[13]

sōlēs occidere et redīre egalik qilish (Katullus)^[14]

"quyosh botishi va yana qaytishi mumkin"

Mukammal sovg'a

Bundan tashqari, uni ishlatish mumkin ijro etuvchi nutq paytida sodir bo'lgan voqeani tasvirlash uchun:

veniō nunc ad Dorylēnsium guvohnomasi (Tsitseron)^[15]

"Men hozir dorilensiyaliklarning guvohligiga keldim"

Tarixiy hozirgi

Hozirgi zamon ko'pincha hikoyada tarixiy ma'noda ishlatiladi, o'tmishdagi voqeaga ishora qiladi, ayniqsa yozuvchi hikoyadagi hayajonli daqiqani tasvirlab berganda. Bu "tarixiy sovg'a" deb nomlanadi:

videt xostlar ... kapitan arma ā yaqin ... (Qaysar)^[16]

"u dushmanning tahdid qilayotganini ko'radi ... darhol qurolini yonidagi odamlardan tortib oladi ..."

Pinksterning so'zlariga ko'ra, tarixiy sovg'a - bu nasrda ham, she'riyatda ham hikoyada ishlatiladigan eng tez-tez bo'lgan vaqt.^[17] U nafaqat mukammal zamonni, balki nomukammal vaqtni ham almashtirishi mumkin:^[18]

tōtīs trepidatur kastrlar (Qaysar)^[19]

"lager bo'ylab odamlar vahimaga tushishdi"

Keyin soqov 'while', hozirgi indikativ shuningdek nomukammal zamon ma'nosiga ega:

bema'ni qochoq, tergō vēlāmina lāpsa relīquit (Ovid)^[20]

u qochib ketayotganda, uning plashi (vlamina) uning orqasidan sirpanib ketdi (tergō) va u buni qoldirdi "

Qaysarda fe'l dastlab yuqoridagi birinchi misolda bo'lgani kabi, jumlaga joylashganda (videt imminēre hostēs), u hozirgi zamonda juda tez-tez uchraydi.^[21]

Tarixiy sovg'ani ishlatish tez-tez uchraydigan yana bir holat, masalan, gapirish fe'llarida fidem dant "ular garov berishadi" yoki juda yaxshi "ular yolvorishadi". Qaysardagi tarixiy sovg'alarning yarmidan ko'pi ana shunday turdagi sovg'alardir.^[22]

Mukammal doimiy ma'no

Hozir ba'zan o'tmishda boshlangan va hanuzgacha davom etayotgan vaziyatga ishora qilib, "qilgan" degan ma'noni anglatishi mumkin. Ba'zi jumlalarda vaqt va ergash gap berilgan men "hozir" qo'shildi:^[23]

bu Lilybaeīning ko'p sonli iam annlari yashash joyi (Tsitseron)^[24]

"u ko'p yillar davomida Lilybaeyda yashaydi"

cīvis Rōmānus iam diū est (Tsitseron)^[25]

"u uzoq vaqtdan buyon Rim fuqarosi"

Hozirgi zamon yordamida bu vaqt ma'nosida ishlatilishi ham mumkin postquam:^[26]

tremō horreōque postquam aspexī hanc (Terens)^[27]

"Men uni ko'rganimdan beri titrab va titrab yuribman"

Ba'zan postquam gapning o'zi hozirgi zamonga ega:

postquam meus est, nullā mē paelice laesit (Jangovar)^[28]

"u meniki bo'lganidan beri, u menga hech qachon ma'shuqa bilan zarar ko'rmagan"

plānē relēgātus mihī video Formiānida posteā quam sum (Tsitseron)^[29]

"Formiyada bo'lganimdan beri o'zimni butunlay aloqamdan uzganimni his qilyapman"

Yana bir ibora - bog`lovchidan foydalanib quyidagilar jum:^[30]

ko'p yillik sunt jum in aere meō est (Tsitseron)^[31]

"u menga ko'p yillar davomida qarzdor" ("ko'p yillar bor u mening bronzamda")

Longum est

Zikr qilinishi mumkin bo'lgan yana bir ibora - bu ibora longum est, bu "uzoq vaqt talab qilishi" yoki "zerikarli bo'lar edi" degan ma'noni anglatadi. Tsitseron va boshqa yozuvchilar tomonidan tez-tez ishlatiladi:^[32]

longum est omnia ēnumerāre proelia (Nepos)^[33]

"barcha janglarni aytib berish zerikarli bo'lar edi"

Kelajakni ko'rsatib beradi

Kelajakdagi voqea yoki vaziyat

Kelasi zamon voqea yoki vaziyatni yaqin yoki uzoq kelajakda tasvirlashi mumkin:

"keyingi" librō tushuntirish (Vitruvius)

"Buni keyingi kitobda tushuntiraman"

ibī cotīdiē tuās litterās exspectābō (Tsitseron)

"u erga kelganimda, har kuni sizning maktublaringizni kutishim kerak"

Kelajakda mukammal va nomukammal jihat o'rtasida farq yo'q.

Kelajak ergash gapli gaplarda

Keyin jum "qachon" yoki sī "agar" yoki kelajakdagi vaqtga tegishli boshqa bo'ysunuvchi bandlar, odatda^[34] kelgusi ingliz tilida hozirgi zamon mavjud bo'lgan joyda ishlatiladi. Kelajak mukammal emas, oddiy kelajak ishlatiladi, agar ikkita fe'lning vaqti bir vaqtning o'zida bo'lsa:

nārrābō cum aliquid habēbō novī (Tsitseron)^[35]

"Men sizga biron bir yangilik bo'lganida aytaman" (lit. "Menda bo'ladi")

crūdam sī eds, inti intuituitda (Kato)^[36]

"agar siz uni (ya'ni karamni) xom ashyo bilan iste'mol qilmoqchi bo'lsangiz, uni sirka ichiga soling"

har bir kvod uchun volēmus facile auferēmus (Tsitseron)^[37]

"u orqali biz xohlagan narsamizga osonlikcha erishamiz" ("xohlaganimiz" ma'nosida)

Odobli so'rovlar

Kelajakni xushmuomalalik iltimoslari uchun ham ishlatish mumkin, chunki Tsitseron do'sti Attikusning rafiqasi va qiziga salom yo'llaganida:

Pīliae salūtem dīcēs va Atticae (Tsitseron)^[38]

"iltimos, Piliya va Attikaga salomlarimni bering"

Nomukammal ko'rsatkich

Nomukammal ko'rsatkich odatda $ a $ ga ega nomukammal ma'nosi va o'tmishdagi vaziyatlarni tavsiflaydi. Ko'pincha nomukammalni inglizchaga 'was' deb tarjima qilish mumkin, lekin ba'zida 'did' sodda zamon yoki 'ishlatilgan', 'bo'lardi', 'davom ettirish', 'qila boshlagan', 'kabi iboralar qilyapman 'ko'proq mos keladi.

Odatiy foydalanish

Nomukammal zamon odatdagi yoki odatiy bo'lib turadigan vaziyatni tasvirlab berishi mumkin:

multum enim illum audibam (Tsitseron)

"Men uni ko'p tinglar edim"

Takroriy foydalanish

Yuqoridagilarga o'xshash takroriy yoki "tez-tez"^[39] nomukammallikdan foydalanish, davom etayotgan yoki noaniq hollarda sodir bo'lgan narsalarning nima ekanligini tasvirlab berish:

Domitium mittitning shikoyat qiluvchisi Pharnacēs ... Domitius javob bering ... ([Qaysar])^[40]

'Pharnaces Domitiusga bir nechta elchixonalarini yubordi ... (har safar) Domitius javob berardi ...'

Muayyan vaqtdagi vaziyat

Shuningdek, u ma'lum bir daqiqada mavjud bo'lgan vaziyatni tasvirlashi mumkin:

virgā, quam in manū gerēbat, Circscrīpsit rēgem (Livi)^[41]

"u qo'lida ushlab turgan tayoq bilan shohni aylanaga tortdi"

Kabi ifodalar tum "keyin" yoki eō tempore "o'sha paytda" qo'shiladi:

sobiq Mettius forte pugnābat (Livi)^[42]

"o'sha paytda (o'lim paytida) Mettius otda jang qilar edi"

salom iam eō tempore erat (Livi)^[43]

"bu vaqt allaqachon qish edi"

Jonli tavsif

Sitseroning ushbu jumlasida bo'lgani kabi, mukammallikni emas, balki nomukammalni ishlatish sahnani yanada jonli qilish uchun ishlatilishi mumkin:

caedēbātur Medi for vir Messānae cīvis Rōmānus, iūdicēs (Tsitseron)^[44]

"Rim fuqarosi Messana forumi o'rtasida tayoq bilan kaltaklanayotgan edi, sudyalar"

Parcha sharhlangan Aulus Gellius. Uning so'zlariga ko'ra caedēbātur dan ko'ra caesus est "chizilgan aniq tavsif" yaratadi (diūtīna repreesentātiō);^[45] ya'ni tomoshabinlarga sahna ularning oldida sodir bo'layotganini ko'rsatish.

Geografik tavsif

Ba'zan atrofni tasvirlash uchun nomukammallik ishlatiladi:

mōns altissimus impendēbat (Qaysar)^[46]

"juda baland tog 'osilgan (yo'l)"

Tugallanmagan harakat

Yana bir foydalanish - kimdir amalga oshirmoqchi bo'lgan yoki qilmoqchi bo'lgan, lekin hech qachon sodir bo'lmagan yoki boshqa voqea bilan to'xtatilgan harakatni tasvirlash uchun:^[47]

Kriam voz kechmoq (Tatsitus)^[48]

"u Senat uyidan chiqib ketmoqchi edi"

amplexūsrentrentis fīliae da ruēbat, nisi interiectī lictōrēs utrīsque obstitissent (Tatsitus)^[49]

'agar qo'riqchilar aralashmasa va ikkalasining ham yo'lida tursalar edi, u o'zi tomon yugurayotgan qizining quchog'iga shoshilardi »

quārtādecimānī postquam Alpibus dēgressi sunt, sēditiōsissimus quisque signa Viennam juda ko'p: Britanniam trānsvecta-da so'zlashuvlarni amalga oshirish va legio (Tatsitus)^[50]

14-chi askarlardan keyin legion dan kelib chiqqan Alp tog'lari, ko'proq isyon ko'targan erkaklar ko'tarish uchun edi standartlar ga Vena; ammo ular yaxshiroq odamlarning kelishuvi bilan tekshirilib, legion Buyuk Britaniyaga ko'chirildi '

"Bajarishni boshladi"

Boshqa bir ma'no - bu ma'lum bir daqiqada boshlangan va abadiy davom etgan vaziyatni tavsiflovchi intseptivdir:^[51]

quō postquam fuga inclīnāvit, aliī in aquam caecī ruēbant, aliī dum cunctantur rīpīs zulmidaī (Livi)^[52]

"marshrut boshlangandan so'ng, ba'zilari ko'r-ko'rona suvga shoshila boshladilar, boshqalari esa qirg'oqda ikkilanib turganda, ezildi"

ubī accēpit hominēs clārōs vēnisse, metū agitabotur (Sallust)^[53]

"ba'zi muhim odamlar kelganini eshitgach, u tashvishlanib qo'zg'aldi"

Pluperfect doimiy ma'nosi

Nomukammal zamon ergash gap bilan ishlatilganda men "hozir" va uzoq vaqt bu "qilgan" degan ma'noni anglatadi:

quod iam diū kubik (Livi)^[54]

"ular uzoq vaqtdan beri orzu qilgan"

Epistolyariya nomukammal

Ba'zan yozuvchi yozuvchida o'zini qabul qiluvchining holatida tasavvur qiladi va yozuvchining o'zi uchun mavjud bo'lgan voqeani tasvirlash uchun o'tgan zamondan foydalanadi:^[55]

etenim ibī sedēns haec ad te scrībēbam (Tsitseron)^[56]

"aslida men sizga buni yozayotganda u erda o'tirgandim" (ya'ni "men sizga buni yozganimda u erda o'tiraman")

Potentsial ma'no ("bo'lar edi")

Ba'zan nomukammal sum potentsial ma'no bilan ishlatiladi ('bo'lardi'):^[57]

omnīnō supervacua erat doctrīna, sī nātūra sufficeret (Kvintilian )^[58]

"agar tabiat etarli bo'lsa, o'qitish mutlaqo ortiqcha bo'lar edi"

jirkanch intererat vestrā, quī patrēs estis, līberōs vestrōs hīc potissimum discere (Pliniy)^[59]

"agar sizning o'g'illaringiz boshqa shaharda emas, balki bu erda o'qisalar, bu sizning otangiz bo'lganlarning manfaatlariga juda mos keladi"

Mukammal ko'rsatkich

O'tgan voqea

Eng zo'r o'tmishdagi voqeani tez-tez aytib beradi. Oddiy tarjima - "-ed" yoki unga teng keladigan oddiy inglizcha o'tgan zamon:

vēnī, vīdī, vīcī (Qaysar)^[60]

"Men keldim, ko'rdim, zabt etdim"

ibī M. Marcellum konvani eumque diem ibī cōnsūmpsī (Serviusdan Tsitseronga)^[61]

"u erda men Marcus Marcellus bilan uchrashdim va o'sha kunni shu erda o'tkazdim"

sobiq nāvī dēsiluērunt (Qaysar)^[62]

"barchasi bir vaqtning o'zida ular kemadan pastga tushishdi"

Hozirgi mukammal ma'no

Perfect ingliz tilidagi hozirgi mukammal kabi ishlatilishi mumkin ('I have done'):^[63]

ecum et mūlum Brundisī tibī relīquī (Tsitseron)^[64]

"Men sizga Brundisiumda ot va xachir qoldirdim"

nōndum satis ōnstituī (Tsitseron)^[65]

"Men hali o'z fikrimni hali tuzganim yo'q"

Kal. Ian. [Kalendīs Iānuāriīs] dēbuit, adhūc nōn solvit (Tsitseron)^[66]

"u pulni 1 yanvarda to'lashi kerak edi, ammo u hali to'lamagan"

Tajribali mukammal

Ingliz mukammalligi singari, ba'zan lotin tilidagi mukammallik ham ilgari bir necha marta sodir bo'lgan voqealarni aytib berish uchun ishlatilishi mumkin:

cōntiōnēs saepe exclāmāre vīdī, cum aptē verba cecidissent (Tsitseron)^[67]

"Men tez-tez jamoat uchrashuvlari so'zlar to'g'ri tushganda (ya'ni ajoyib ritm bilan) baland ovoz bilan baqirganini ko'rganman"

Bunga o'xshash "gnomic perfect", bu o'tgan tajribaga asoslangan umumiy haqiqatni bayon qiladi:^[68]

nōn aeris acervus et aurī dēdūxit corpore febrīs (Horace)^[69]

"bronza va oltin uyumi hech qachon tanadan isitmani olib tashlamagan" (ya'ni olib tashlamaydi)

Takroriy harakat

"Qachonki X paydo bo'lsa, Y sodir bo'ladi" degan ma'noda, umumiy vaqtga ishora qilib, Y hodisadan oldin bo'lsa, voqea uchun mukammal zamon ishlatiladi.^[70] Ingliz tilida hozirgi zamon ko'pincha ishlatiladi:

dum legō, adsentior, jum posuī librum adsēnsiō omnis illa ēlābitur (Tsitseron)^[71]

"o'qiyotganimda, men roziman, lekin kitobni qo'yishim bilanoq, bu kelishuv bekor qilinadi"

jum hūc vēnī, hoc ipsum nihil agere dēlectat (Tsitseron)^[72]

"bu erga kelganimda," hech narsa qilmaslik "meni quvontiradi"

Vaqt uzunligi

Nomukammal emas, balki mukammal, vaziyat o'tmishda ma'lum vaqt davom etgan deb aytilganida ishlatiladi, ammo endi tugadi:^[73]

nāgintā vīxit annn (Tsitseron)^[74]

"u to'qson yil yashadi"

Cassius tōtā vītā aquam bibit (Seneka)^[75]

"Kassiy butun umri davomida suv ichgan"

omnēs ante vōs cōnsulēs senātuī pāruērunt (Tsitseron)^[76]

'Sizdan oldingi barcha konsullar' Senatga bo'ysungan '

Ushbu qoidadan istisnolar juda kam uchraydi, ammo ular sodir bo'lishi mumkin, masalan, davom etayotgan tugallanmagan vaziyatni tavsiflovchi:^[77]

Philippus nūllus -ququ nec necus nūntius ab eō per per aliquot hōras veniēbat (Livi)^[78]

'Filipp hech qaerda ko'rinmas edi va bir necha soat davomida undan bironta xabarchi kelmadi'

Xuddi shunday mukammal har doim mavjud bo'lgan va mavjud bo'lgan vaziyat uchun ishlatiladi:

mēcum vīvit semperque vīxit (Tsitseron)^[79]

"u men bilan yashaydi va doim shunday qilgan"

Eram va fuī

Ularning ikkalasi ham ingliz tilida "men edim" degan ma'noni anglatadi, lekin lotin tilida odatda farq bor. Boshqa fe'llarda bo'lgani kabi, mukammallik odatda vaqtning uzunligi haqida gap ketganda ishlatiladi:

diū ... sessiya fitna (Livi)^[80]

"uzoq vaqt sukut saqlanib qoldi"

Gapda vaziyat emas, balki voqea-hodisani tasvirlashda ham mukammal ishlatiladi:

aquae ingentēs eō annō fuērunt et Tiberis loca plāna urbis inundāvit (Livi)^[81]

"o'sha yili katta toshqinlar bo'lgan va Tiber shaharning tekis joylarini suv ostida qoldirgan"

fuistī igitur apud Laecam illā nocte, Catilīna (Tsitseron)^[82]

- shuning uchun siz o'sha kecha Laekaning uyida edingiz, Katilin! (ya'ni siz yig'ilishda qatnashdingiz)

Biroq, mukammal fuī "Men bir paytlar edim", "men ilgari edim" ba'zan avvalgi holatni tasvirlash uchun ishlatiladi, bu uning mavjud emasligini ta'kidlaydi:^[83]

ego tam fuī quam vōs estis (Petronius)^[84]

"Men bir paytlar senga o'xshagan edim"

statua Attī ... ad laevam cūriae fitna (Livi)^[85]

Bir paytlar haykali bor edi Attus senat uyining chap tomonida '

fuimus Tres, fitna Liy (Virgil)^[86]

'biz troyan bo'lishni to'xtatdik; Troy endi yo'q '

Perfect, vaqtinchalik holatni tavsiflovchi nomukammaldan farqli o'laroq, doimiy holatni tavsiflovchi quyidagi kabi jumlalarda ham qo'llaniladi:^[87]

Samia mihī māter fitna; ea habitābat Rhodī (Terens)^[88]

'onam samiyalik edi; u Rodosda yashagan (o'sha paytda) "

apud Helvēti's longē nōbilissimus fitna va boshqalar Orgetorix (Qaysar)^[89]

"Helvetiyaliklar orasida eng zodagon va eng badavlat odamlar Orgetorix edi"

Pinksterga ko'ra, foydalanish erat bu ikkita misolda noto'g'ri ko'rinadi. 'Ikkala holatda ham o'quvchi "Keyin nima bo'ldi?"^[90]

Perfect kabi qo‘shimchalar bilan ham ishlatilishi kerak semel 'bir marta', bis "ikki marta", ter "uch marta", demakki, vaziyat endi tugagan:^[91]

fuī Bishoniyadagi bis (Tsitseron)^[92]

"Men Bitiniyada ikki marta bo'lganman"

Geografik tavsif uchun, erat ishlatilgan:

eō flūmine pōns-da erat (Qaysar)^[93]

"o'sha daryoda ko'prik bor edi"

Shuningdek, zamon befarq ishlatilishi mumkin bo'lgan ba'zi bir jumlalar turlari mavjud, masalan, kimningdir ismini yoki fe'l-atvorini tavsiflashda:

Manus eī nōmen erat / Domenī fitna nōmen (Livi)^[94]

"uning ismi Manus edi" / "uning ismi Dinomenes edi"

dīligēns erat imperator / imperator fitna summus (Nepos)^[95]

'u mehnatkash general edi' / 'u zo'r general edi'

Ushbu ikki vaqtning tengligi, davr va fui ikkalasi ham "men edim" degan ma'noni anglatadi, bugungi kunda ham ispan va portugal tillarida mavjud. (Qarang Ispaniya konjugatsiyasi, Portugaliyalik fe'l konjugatsiyasi.)

Meminī, īdī, nōvī

Eng ko'p uchraydigan ma'lum fe'llar meminī 'Eslayman', īdī "Men nafratlanaman" va nōvī "Bilaman" mukammal zamonda ishlatiladi, ammo hozirgi zamon ma'nosiga ega:

meminī mē adesse (Tsitseron)^[96]

"Hozir bo'lganimni eslayman"

sī tū oblītus es, dī da meminērunt (Katullus)^[97]

"hatto unutgan bo'lsangiz ham, xudolar eslashadi"

īdī va hokazo (Katullus)^[98]

"Men nafratlanaman va sevaman"

Ushbu fe'llarning kelajakdagi mukammal va pluperfektsiyasi kelajak yoki nomukammal zamonga teng keladigan bo'lib xizmat qiladi: meminerō "Men eslayman", memineram 'Men esladim'. meminī imperativga ega yodgorlikō "eslayman!"

Fe'l nōvī odatda "bilaman" degan ma'noni anglatadi, lekin ba'zida "tanishib qoldim" degan o'tmish ma'nosi bor:

tē nōn nōvimus, nescīmus quī sīs, numquam tē anteā vīdimus (Tsitseron)^[99]

'biz seni tanimaymiz, kimligingni bilmaymiz, seni ilgari ko'rmaganmiz'

sum. sed ubī tū mē nōvistī gentium aut vīdistī aut conlocūtu's?^[100] (Plautus)^[101]

"Men (siz aytgan odamman). Ammo siz er yuzida qaerda tanishgansiz yoki meni ko'rganmisiz yoki men bilan hech qachon suhbatlashmaganmisiz?

Mukammal cōnsuēscō, cōnsuēvī "Men odatlanib qoldim", shuningdek, hozirgi ma'noda ishlatiladi:^[102]

quī diēs estéss maksimal cōnsuēvit (Qaysar)^[103]

"bu kun odatda eng yuqori to'lqinlarni keltirib chiqaradi"

Bilan mukammal Xabeō

Ba'zan boshlanishlar bilan shakllangan mukammal zamonni ko'rish mumkin habeo ('Menda') va mukammal ergash gap, bu frantsuz va italyan tillarida mukammallikni shakllantirishning odatiy usuliga aylandi:

ratiōnes Erōtis, etsī ipsum nondum vīdī, tamen ex litter's eius prope modum ognitās habeō (Tsitseron)^[104]

"Erosning qaydnomalariga kelsak, men uni shaxsan ko'rmagan bo'lsam ham, ularning maktubidan nima deyishlarini ozmi-ko'pmi bilib oldim"

Anormallik perspectum habeō,ognitum, iūdicātum (Tsitseron)^[105]

"Endi men Klodiyning aqlini sinchkovlik bilan o'rganib chiqdim, o'rgandim va hukm qildim"

Gilderslive va Lodjning fikriga ko'ra, mukammallikning bu shakli "Perfect uchun shunchaki aylanib o'tish emas, balki natijani saqlab qolish uchun alohida stressni keltirib chiqaradi".^[106]

Keyinchalik lotin tilida ushbu qurilish yanada keng tarqalgan, masalan:^[107]

ecce episcopum ... invītātum habēs et vix nōbīs supersunt quattuor vīnī amphorae (Turlar Gregori, VI asr)^[108]

"Siz episkopni taklif qildingiz, bizda esa to'rtta aroq vino qoldi!"

Bilan o'zgarishi teneō "Men ushlab turaman yoki saqlayman" ba'zan ham uchraydi, lekin odatda ushlab turish g'oyasiga urg'u berib:

populī Rōmānī mashqlar Cn. Pompeium circumsedet, fossā et vallō saeptum tenet, fugā man (Tsitseron)^[109]

"Rim xalqining qo'shini Gney Pompeyni qamal qilmoqda, uni zovur va devor bilan o'ralgan holda ushlab turadi va qochib ketishiga yo'l qo'ymaydi"

Pluperfect xuddi shu kabi o'tgan zamonlardan biri yordamida amalga oshirilishi mumkin Xabeō:^[110]

montibus kastrasida odati posita Pompeius cōnspectū utrōrumque oppidōrum-da ([Qaysar])^[111]

'Pompeius had placed a camp in the mountains within sight of both towns'

Caesar equitātum omnem quem ex omnī prōvinciā coāctum habēbat kamolot (Caesar)^[112]

'Caesar sent ahead all the cavalry which he had gathered together from the whole province'

itaque nāvīs omnīs quās parātās habuerant ad nāvigandum prōpugnātōribus īnstrūxērunt ([Caesar])^[113]

'and so they drew up and manned with fighters all the ships which they had earlier got ready for sailing'

Perfect passive with fuī

Normally the perfect passive tenses are formed with sum, erōva eram (masalan, captus sum 'I was captured', captus erō 'I will have been captured', captus eram 'I had been captured'). Occasionally, however, they can be formed with fuī, masalan captus fuī, captus fuerō, captus fueram.^[114]

oldin nātus fuit Sophoclēs quam Eurīpidēs [nātus est] (Gellius)^[115]

'Sophocles was born before Euripides'

quod tibī fuerit persuāsum, huīc erit persuāsum (Tsitseron)^[116]

'whatever is (lit. will have been proved) acceptable to you will be acceptable to him'

arma quae fīxa in pariētibus fuerant, ea sunt humī inventa (Tsitseron)^[117]

'the weapons which had (earlier) been fixed on the walls were found on the ground'

quae sī quandō adepta est id quod eī fuerat concupītum, tum fert alacritātem (Tsitseron)^[118]

'if ever (desire) has obtained what it had earlier set its heart on, it brings joy'

In these examples, the fact that the verb with fitna in each case refers to an earlier state than the verb with est is clearly a factor in the choice of tense.^[119]

In authors from Livy onwards the pluperfect with fueram and future perfect with fuerō are sometimes loosely used for the normal pluperfect with eram and future perfect with erō:^[120]

Sextus Rōmae relictus fuerat (Livi)^[121]

'Sextus had been left behind in Rome'

Yilda Plautus these tenses are used several times with the deponent verb oblīvīscor 'I forget':

paen oblītus fuī (Plautus)^[122]

'I almost forgot!'

lūcernam forte oblītus fueram exstinguere (Plautus)^[123]

'by chance I had forgotten to extinguish the lamp'

Future perfect indicative

Independent use

The future perfect is usually used in a sentence with 'if' or 'when' referring to future time, but it can sometimes be used on its own, as in the following sentences:

Pompōnia, tū invītā mulierēs, egō virōs accīverō (Tsitseron)^[124]

'Pomponia, you invite the women, and (meanwhile) I will have summoned the men'

Another famous passage with a future perfect is the call of the burgut -bearer to his men when their boat reached the shore of Britain in 55 BC:

'dēsilite', inquit, 'mīlitēs, nisī vultis aquilam hostibus prōdere; egō certē meum reī pūblicae atque imperātōrī officium praestiterō' (Caesar)^[125]

'Jump down, soldiers,' he said, 'unless you want to betray the eagle to the enemy. I will certainly have done my own duty for the republic and the commander!'

There is also an idiom using the future perfect of videō, where the future perfect is almost equivalent to a command:^[126]

vōs vīderītis quod illī dēbeātur (Livi)^[127]

'you must see to it what is due to that man'

Keyin sī va jum

More frequently the future perfect tense is found after sī 'if' or jum 'when' in clauses referring to a future time. In such sentences English uses the present tense:^[128]^[129]

moriēre, sī ēmīserīs vōcem! (Livi)^[130]

'you will die, if you utter a sound!' (lit. 'if you will have uttered')

dein, cum mīlia multa fēcerīmus, conturbābimus illa (Katullus)^[131]

'then, when we have made many thousands, we will muddle up the accounts'

sī quid acciderit, tē certiōrem faciam statim (Tsitseron)^[132]

'if anything happens, I'll let you know at once'

ut sēmentum fēcerīs, ita metēs (Tsitseron)^[133]

'as you sow (lit. will have sown), so shall you reap'

Future perfect of meminī va ōdī

The future perfect of meminī va ōdī has a simple future meaning:

meminerō, dē istōc quiētus estō (Plautus)^[134]

'I'll remember, don't worry about that'

ōdī hominem et ōderō (Tsitseron)^[135]

'I hate the man, and I always will'

Pluperfect indicative

Prior event

The pluperfect can be used as in English to describe an event that had happened earlier than the time of the narrative:

quae gēns paucīs ante mēnsibus ad Caesarem lēgātōs mīserat (Caesar)^[136]

'this nation had sent ambassadors to Caesar a few months previously'

Often, like the imperfect tense, the pluperfect can be used to describe the situation prevailing at a certain moment:

abierant cēterī; Clītus ultimus sine lūmine exībat (Curtius)^[137]

'the others had already departed; Clitus was going out last, without a light'

Iterative use

In subordinate clauses of the type 'whenever...', 'whoever...' etc. in past time the pluperfect indicative is used if the event precedes the event of the main clause. Usually in English the simple past is used:^[138]

cum rosam vīderat tum incipere vēr arbitrābātur (Tsitseron)^[139]

'it was only whenever he saw a rose that he thought that spring was beginning'

cōnfectō itinere cum ad aliquod oppidum vēnerat, eādem lectīcā ūsque in cubiculum dēferēbātur (Tsitseron)^[140]

'at the end of the journey, whenever he came to some town, he would be carried in the same axlat straight into his bedroom'

In later writers such as Livy, the pluperfect subjunctive is used in a similar context.^[141]

Potential meaning ('would have')

Sometimes in a conditional clause a pluperfect indicative can have the meaning of a potential pluperfect subjunctive ('would have'), when it refers to an event which very nearly took place, but did not:^[142]

perāctum erat bellum, sī Pompeium Brundisiī opprimere potuisset (Gul )^[143]

'the war would have been completely finished, if (Caesar) had been able to crush Pompey da Brundisium '

Pluperfect of meminī, ōdī, nōvī

The pluperfect of ōdī, nōvī va meminī has the meaning of an imperfect:

meminerant ad Alesiam magnam sē inopiam perpessōs (Caesar)^[144]

'they remembered how they had put up with a great shortage at Alesiya '

ōderam multō peius hunc quam illum ipsum Clōdium (Tsitseron)^[145]

'I hated this man even more than I hated Klodiy himself'

nōn nōverat Catilīnam; Āfricam tum praetor ille obtinēbat (Tsitseron)^[146]

'he did not know Katilin, since the latter was at that time governor of Africa'

Subjunktiv kayfiyat

The subjunktiv kayfiyat in Latin has four tenses, which are as shown below. Note that the meanings given here are only very approximate, since in fact each tense has a wide variety of meanings.

Subjunctive tenses (3rd conjugation)
	Faol	Ma'nosi	Passiv	Ma'nosi
Hozir	dūcam	'I would/should/can lead'	dūcar	'I would/should be led'
Nomukammal	dūcerem	'I would/should/could lead/be leading'	dūcerer	'I would be (being) led'
Zo'r	dūxerim	'I would/could have led'	ductus sim	'I would have been led'
Pluperfect	dūxissem	'I would/could/should have led'	ductus essem	'I would have been led'

For the subjunctive of other verbs, see the table at the beginning of this article.

The present subjunctive of 3rd conjugation verbs resembles the future in the 1st person singular, but in other persons it differs. The subjunctive goes dūcam, dūcās, dūcat... while the future indicative goes dūcam, dūcēs, dūcet...

There is no future subjunctive tense as such, although there is a periphrastic future subjunctive (factūrus sim), which is used for example in indirect questions.

1-chi kelishik fe'llarining hozirgi ergash gapi bilan tugaydi -em, -ēs, -et, of conjugations 2, 3, and 4 in -am, -ās, -atva of sum, possum, volō, nōlō, mālō yilda -im, -īs, -it.

The imperfect subjunctive of every active verb has the same form as the infinitive with the endings -em, -ēs etc.: amarem, vidērem, audīrem va boshqalar.

In 1st conjugation verbs, the ending -āvissem is frequently contracted to -āssem.

Hozirgi zamon sub'ektivligi

Potentsial

The present subjunctive can be potential ('would', 'could') or jussive ('should'). After the word fortasse perhaps, it can mean 'may', expressing a possibility:

dūrum hoc fortasse videotasvir (Tsitseron)^[147]

'this may perhaps seem harsh'

It can also express a wish for the future (the word utinam is usually added):

utinam illam diem videam! (Tsitseron)^[148]

'may I live to see that day!'

A more usual translation for the potential subjunctive, however, is 'would'. In conditional sentences, the present subjunctive usually refers to some hypothetical situation in the future. This kind of conditional sentence is known as 'ideal':^[149]

haec sī tēcum patria loquātur, nōnne impetrāre debeat? (Tsitseron)^[150]

'if your country were to say this to you, shouldn't she be granted her request?'

hanc viam sī asperam esse negem, mentiar (Tsitseron)^[151]

'if I were to deny that this road is a rough one, I would be lying'

In early Latin, a present subjunctive can also be used to make an unreal conditional referring to the present:^[152]

haud rogem tē, sī sciam (Plautus)^[153]

'I wouldn't be asking you, if I knew'

However, there was a gradual shift in usage, and in the classical period, and even sometimes in Plautus, the imperfect subjunctive is used in such clauses (see below for examples).

Historic potential

Sometimes in poetry a present subjunctive can be used to refer to a potential past event, where in prose a pluperfect subjunctive would be used in both halves of the sentence:^[154]

nī docta comes admoneat, inruat et frūstrā ferrō dīverberet umbrās (Virgil)^[155]

'had his learned companion not warned him, Aeneas would have rushed in and beaten aside the ghosts with his sword in vain'

Generalising 2nd person

When a conditional sentence expresses a generalisation, the present subjunctive is used for any 2nd person singular verb, whether in the subordinate clause or the main clause:^[156] Thus, in the subordinate clause:

ferrum sī exerceās conteritur (Cato)^[157]

'if ever you use iron, it gets worn away'

(senectūs) plēna est voluptātis, sī illā sciās ūtī (Seneca)^[158]

'old age is full of pleasure, if you know how to enjoy it'

And in the main clause:

quom inopia est, cupiās (Plautus)^[159]

'whenever there's a shortage of something, you want it'

Jussive

When the subjunctive has a jussive meaning, it can be a suggestion or command in the 1st or 3rd person:

vīvamus, meb Lesbiya, atque amēmus (Katullus)^[160]

'let's live, my Lesbia, and let's love'

sedeat hīc (Gellius)^[161]

'let him sit here!'

In philosophy it can set the scene for a discussion:

vēndat aedēs vir bonus (Tsitseron)^[162]

'let us suppose that a good man is selling a house'

Another use is concessive:

o'tirish fūr, o'tirish sacrilegus, o'tirish flāgitiōrum omnium vitiōrumque prīnceps; at est bonus imperātor (Tsitseron)^[163]

'he may well be a thief, he may well be a temple robber, he may be the leader of all outrages and vices; nonetheless he is a good general!'

The subjunctive is also used in deliberative questions (which are questions which expect an imperative answer):^[164]

dē Pompeiō quid agam? (Tsitseron)^[165]

'what ought I to do about Pompey?'

In dependent clauses

The present subjunctive is also used in a great variety of subordinate clauses set in present time, such as purpose clauses, indirect commands, consecutive clauses, clauses of fearing, indirect questions, and others. In some of these constructions, it can often be translated simply as if it were an ordinary present indicative, such as after causal jum:

quae cum ita sint (Tsitseron)^[166]

'since these things are so'

The subjunctive is also used in purpose clauses (also known as final clauses):^[167]

oportet ēsse ut vīvās, nōn vīvere ut edās (Rhētorica ad Herennium )^[168]

'you should eat so that you can live, not live so that you can eat'

One of the most common uses of the subjunctive is to indicate reported speech. When a question is made indirect, the verb is always changed into the subjunctive mood. The present subjunctive can therefore represent what would be a present indicative if the question was direct:

quāri id faciam, fortasse requīris? (Katullus)^[169]

'do you perhaps ask why I do that?'

In reported speech, the present subjunctive can also represent a present imperative or a jussive subjunctive. This type of construction is known as an indirect command:

nūntium mittit ut veniant (Livi)^[170]

'she sends a messenger (to say) that they should come'

Keyin quīn, if the context is clearly future, a present subjunctive can sometimes represent a future tense or potential subjunctive:^[171]

haec sī ēnūntiāta Ariovistō sint, nōn dubitāre quīn dē omnibus supplicium sūmat (Caesar)^[172]

'they said that if these things were reported to Ariovistus, they didn't doubt that he would put them all to death'

Similarly in the protasis ('if' clause) of a conditional sentence in indirect speech, a present subjunctive can represent an original future indicative:^[173]

nisī dēcēdat atque exercitum dēdūcat, sēsē illum prō hoste habitūrum (Caesar)^[174]

'(Ariovistus told Caesar that) if he did not retreat and withdraw his army, he would treat him as an enemy'

In other examples in reported speech, the subjunctive in the 'if' clause represents an original present subjunctive with potential meaning:

voluptātem, sī ipsa prō sē loquātur, concessūram arbitror dignitātī (Tsitseron)^[175]

'I believe that Pleasure, if she were to speak for herself, would give way to Dignity'

Archaic subjunctives

In old Latin, a form of the subjunctive with -s-, known as the sigmatic aorist subjunctive, is preserved (faxim, servāssim va boshqalar.). This is used in wishes for the future:^[176]

dī tē servāssint semper! (Plautus)^[177]

'may the gods preserve you always!'

deī faxint ut liceat! (Tsitseron)^[178]

'may the gods ensure that it be allowed'

In Plautus this subjunctive is also used in prohibitions, when it exists:^[179]

nīl mē cūrāssīs! (Plautus)^[180]

'don't worry about me!'

In some phrases it has a conditional meaning:

erkak faxim lubēns (Plautus)^[181]

'I would willingly do him harm!'

nec satis sciō, nec, sī sciam, dīcere ausim (Livi)^[182]

'I do not know, nor, if I knew, would I dare to say'

Another archaic subjunctive is siem uchun sim, which is very common in Plautus and Terence, but fell out of use later:

scīs ubī siēt? (Terens)^[183]

'do you know where she is?'

Kamroq tarqalgan fuam, xuddi shu ma'noda. This occurs occasionally in Plautus and also once in Lucretius (4.635) and once in Virgil's Eneyid, where the archaic form is presumably appropriate for the speech of the god Jupiter:

Trōs Rutulusne fuat, nūllō discrīmine habēbō (Virgil)^[184]

'whether it be Trojan or Rutulian, I shall make no distinction!'

Another old subjunctive is duim, from the verb dō 'I give'. It occurs mostly in Plautus and Terence, but sometimes also in Cicero, in phrases like the following:

dī tē perduint! (Plautus)^[185]

'may the gods destroy you!'

Nomukammal subjunktiv

The imperfect indicative is always nomukammal in aspect ('was doing'); the imperfect subjunctive is also often imperfective in meaning ('I was doing', 'I would be doing'). However, as the examples below show, it can also sometimes be perfective ('I did'), in view of the fact that it often represents the transformation into past time of a present or future tense or an imperative.

Potentsial

The imperfect subjunctive is often used in wishes to represent an imagined or wished for situation impossible at the present time:^[186]

utinam Servius Sulpicius vīveret! (Tsitseron)^[187]

'if only Servius Sulpicius were alive!'

Similarly in unreal conditional sentences, the imperfect subjunctive represents a situation which is hypothetical or imaginary, referring to the present time:

Sicilia tōta, sī ūnā vōce loquerētur, hoc dīceret (Tsitseron)^[188]

'if the whole of Sicily were able to speak with one voice, it would be saying (would say) this'

scrīberem ad tē dē hōc plūra, sī Rōmae essēs (Tsitseron)^[189]

'I would write more about this to you, if you were in Rome'

sī intus esset, ēvocārem (Plautus)^[190]

'if he were inside, I would be calling him out'

quid facerēs, sī amīcum perdidissēs? (Seneca)^[191]

'how would you react, if you had lost a friend?'

In the following sentence, the imperfect subjunctive vellem is used to wish for something that cannot now come true, while the present subjunctive velim leaves open the possibility that it may be true:

dē Menedēmō vellem vērum fuisset, dē rēgīnā velim vērum sit. (Tsitseron)^[192]

'I wish it had been true about Menedemus; I hope it may be true about the queen'

Generalising 2nd person

The 2nd person imperfect subjunctive when potential is nearly always indefinite and generalising, i.e. an imaginary 'you':^[193]

crēderēs victōs (Livi)^[194]

'you would have thought them beaten'

Jussive

A rarer use of the imperfect subjunctive is the past jussive:^[195]

at tū dictīs, Albāne, manērēs! (Virgil)^[196]

'you should have remained true to your words, o Alban!'

This usage is quite common in Plautus^[197] but rare in later Latin. The normal prose practice is to use either a past tense of dēbeō 'I have a duty to' or oportet 'it is proper' with the infinitive, or else a gerundive with a past tense of sum.

The imperfect subjunctive can also be used in deliberative questions, that is to say, questions asking for advice, in a past time context:

quid faserem? (Virgil)^[198]

'what was I to do?'

In dependent clauses

The imperfect subjunctive is very commonly found in past context dependent clauses, where it can represent the transformation of a present indicative or imperative. The following example contains an indirect command reflecting an imperative in direct speech:

imperāvit eī ut omnēs forēs aedificiī atrofi (Nepos)^[199]

'he ordered him to go round all the doors of the building'

Another very common use is the circumstantial jum-clause with the imperfect subjunctive. Here the imperfect subjunctive has the same meaning as an imperfect indicative would have if jum were omitted:

jum sedērem, inquit, domī trīstis, accurrit Venerius (Tsitseron)^[200]

'while I was sitting at home in a sad mood,' he said, 'Venerius came running up'

On the other hand, in result clauses after verbs meaning 'it happened that...', the imperfect subjunctive is always used even of a simple perfective action, which, if the grammatical construction did not require a subjunctive, would be expressed by a perfect indicative:^[201]

accidit ut ūnā nocte omnēs Hermae dēicerentur praeter ūnum (Nepos)^[202]

'it happened that in a single night all the statues of Hermes were thrown down except one'

In indirect questions in a historic context, an imperfect subjunctive usually represents the transformation of a present indicative:^[203]

quaesīvit salvusne esset klipus (Tsitseron)^[204]

'Epaminondas asked whether his shield was safe'

Similarly, in the following example after quīn, the imperfect subjunctive also represents the transformation of a present indicative:

nec dubitavēre Persae, quīn Issō relictā Macedones fugerent (Curtius)^[205]

'nor did the Persians doubt that, now that they had abandoned Issus, the Macedonians were fleeing'

However, when the context makes it clear that the reference is to the future, the imperfect subjunctive after quīn can have a prospective or future meaning:^[206]

nec, sī illa restituerētur, dubitāvī quīn mē sēcum redūceret (Tsitseron)^[207]

'and I didn't doubt that, if the republican government were restored, it would bring me back with it'

An imperfect subjunctive can also have a prospective or future meaning after a verb of fearing or expecting:^[208]

verēns nē dēderētur, Crētam vēnit (Nepos)^[209]

'fearing that he might be handed over to the Romans, he fled to Crete'

It can also have a prospective or future meaning in a relative clause:^[210]

ante lūcem vōta ea quae numquam solveret nūncupāvit (Tsitseron)^[211]

'before dawn he announced those vows which he was never to fulfil'

In the protasis of a conditional clause in indirect speech the imperfect subjunctive can similarly represent a future indicative:^[212]

quiētūrus haud dubiē, nisī ultrō Etrūscī arma inferrent (Livi)^[213]

'with the intention of remaining inactive, unless (at some future time) the Etruscans were to attack of their own accord'

Forem

Just as the verb sum 'I am' has a future infinitive oldingi, qisqasi futūrum esse, so it also has a past-potential subjunctive forem, qisqasi futūrus essem. This is not used in Caesar, but is common in Livy and Nepos.^[214] It is used especially in conditional sentences,^[215] either in the protasis ('if' clause) or the apodosis (main clause), and it generally has a potential or future meaning.

One common use, in combination with a perfect passive participle, is with the meaning 'would have been' in past conditional sentences:

dēlētusque exercitus foret nī fugientēs silvae texissent (Livi)^[216]

'and the army would have been annihilated if the woods hadn't provided cover for those who were fleeing'

obsessaque urbs foret, nī Horātius cōnsul esset revocātus (Livi)^[217]

'and the city would have been besieged, if the consul Horatius had not been recalled'

Another use is in indirect speech after sī 'if' as the equivalent of a future indicative in the original direct speech:

imperat Tullus utī iuventūtem in armīs habeat: ūsūrum sē eōrum operā sī bellum cum Veientibus foret (Livi)^[218]

'Tullus ordered him to keep the young men armed; he would need their help if (at some future time) there was a war with the people of Veii'

sī summus foret, futūrum brevem (Tsitseron)^[219]

'(he was confident) that even if (the pain) were going to be very great, it would be brief'

It can also be used with a future meaning in sentences like the following, which are not conditional:

mihī dubium non erat quīn ille iam iamque foret in Āpūliā (Tsitseron)^[220]

'I personally have no doubt [epistolary imperfect] that he will be in Apulia any moment now'

multō sē in suō lectulō mālle, quicquid foret (Tsitseron)^[221]

'he said that he would far rather die in his own bed, whatever might happen in future'

idque eō dīcitur fēcisse, quō inter sē fīdī magis forent (Sallust)^[222]

'and it is said that he did this so that (in future) they would be more trustworthy to one other'

pars stāre incertī utrum prōgredī an regredī in castra tūtius foret (Livi)^[223]

'some were standing still, uncertain whether it would be safer to go forward or to retreat into the camp'

Aristotelēs respondit factūrum esse quod vellent, cum id sibī foret tempestīvum (Gellius)^[224]

'Aristotle replied that he would do what they wanted when it was going to seem to him a suitable time'

With a perfect participle after sī yoki quī, foret + the perfect participle can represent a future perfect tense of a deponent or passive verb:

puerum, prīmus Priamō quī foret postillā nātus, temperāret tollere (Tsitseron)^[225]

'the oracle told Priam that he should forbear to raise the first son who was going to be born to him subsequently'

timor inde patrēs incessit nē, sī dīmissus exercitus foret, rūrsus coetūs occultī coniūrātiōnēsque fīerent (Livi)^[226]

'the senators began to be afraid that if the army were dismissed, there would be further secret meetings and conspiracies'

nē, sī ab hostibus eae captae forent, cōnsilia sua nōscerentur, epistulās id genus factās mittēbant (Gellius)^[227]

'in case those letters were captured by the enemy and their plans discovered, they used to send them in this way'

However, the same future perfect meaning can be expressed with a simple participle or by an ordinary pluperfect subjunctive:

hanc Graecīs cōnscrīptam litterīs mittit, nē interceptā epistolā nostra ab hostibus cōnsilia cognōscantur (Caesar)^[228]

'he sent this in Greek, in case the letter was intercepted and our plans learnt by the enemy'

summum erat perīculum nē, sī nihil impetrāssent, plānē aliēnārentur ā senātū (Tsitseron)^[229]

'there was the greatest danger that if they didn't obtain any concession, they would be completely alienated from the Senate'

In other sentences, however, it has no future meaning, merely potential, as in the following example, where it appears to be used simply for metrical convenience as the equivalent of esset in the second half:

sī fraxinus esset, fulva colōre foret; sī cornus, nōdus inesset (Ovid)^[230]

'if it were made of ash-wood, it would be light in colour; if cornel-wood, there would be a knot in it'

Similarly in the following conditional clause, it has a past, not future, meaning:

sī utrumvīs hōrum unquam tibi vīsus forem, nōn sīc lūdibriō tuīs factīs habitus essem (Terens)^[231]

'if I had ever seemed either of these things to you, I wouldn't have been made a mockery of by your deeds in this way'

Zo'r subjunktiv

Independent use

In wishes, the perfect subjunctive expresses a wish for the past, leaving open the possibility that it may have happened:^[232]

utinam vērē augurāverim (Tsitseron)^[233]

'I hope that I have prophesied correctly!'

Sometimes the perfect subjunctive seems to refer to present or future time, and mean 'could'.^[234] For example, in the following idiom the perfect is usual:

nōn facile dīxerim quicquam mē vīdisse pulchrius^[235]

'Men bundan ham go'zalroq narsani ko'rganman deb bemalol aytolmadim (= o'ylamayman)'

In a conditional sentence it can mean 'would do':^[236]

Cicerōnī nēmo ducentōs nunc dederit nummōs, nisi fulserit ānulus ingēns (Juvenal)

'these days no one would give Cicero even two hundred tuppences, unless a huge ring glittered (on his finger)'

In the following, it is the transference into hypothetical mood of a future perfect indicative, describing a future potential result:

sī nunc mē suspendam, meīs inimīcīs voluptātem creāverim (Plautus)^[237]

'if I were to hang myself now, I would simply end up having given pleasure to my enemies'

In the following sentence both 'could' and 'could have' are possible:^[238]

ad sexāgintā captōs scrīpserim, sī auctōrem Graecum sequar (Livi)^[239]

"Agar men yunon hokimiyatiga ergashsam, asirlarning soni oltmishta deb yozgan bo'lardim"

Boshqa misollarda mukammal subjunktiv o'tmishga ishora qiladi va "qilgan bo'lishi mumkin" yoki "qilgan bo'lar edi" degan ma'noni anglatadi:^[240]

Themistocls nihil dīxerit quō ipse Arēopagum adiūverit (Tsitseron)^[241]

'Themistocles o'zi qanday yordam bergani haqida hech narsa deya olmas edi Areopagus '

Amaldagi tuzning emi ... va Libu's Gallning reklamasi dēdūxerint (Livi)^[242]

"bu ikkala dovon ham olib kelgan bo'lar edi (Gannibal ) livanlik gallargacha

Salbiy zarracha bilan nē u salbiy buyruqni ifoda etishi mumkin. Bu erda subjunktiv potentsialga emas, balki jussive foydalanishga ega:

nē ... o'lmoq timuerītis^[243]

"o'limdan qo'rqmaslik kerak"

Qaratilgan gaplarda

Mukammal ergash gap, asosan, bog‘langan gaplarda ishlatiladi. Odatda bu mustaqil bandda mukammal ko'rsatkich bo'lishi mumkin bo'lgan narsani anglatadi. Biroq, mukammal subjunktivni ishlatishdan boshqa biron bir nomukammal vaqtni birlamchi ketma-ketlikda ifodalashning imkoni yo'qligi sababli, u ba'zan nomukammal ko'rsatkichni ham anglatishi mumkin.^[244] Barkamol subjunktiv odatda asosiy fe'l birlamchi (ya'ni o'tmish bo'lmagan) zamonlardan biri bo'lganda topiladi. Kontekst asosiy bo'lganida, keng tarqalgan foydalanish bilvosita savollarda:

ex eō facile conicī poterit, quam cārus suīs fuerit (Nepos)^[245]

"bu uning xalqi uchun qanchalik aziz bo'lganligi haqida bemalol taxmin qilinadi"

quid lēgātī ēgerint nōndum scīmus (Tsitseron)^[246]

"biz elchilar nima qilganini hali bilmaymiz" (yoki "qilayotgan" yoki "qilgan")

qattiqroq an sēderim nesciō (Seneka oqsoqol)^[247]

'Men turdimmi yoki o'tirdimmi bilmayman'

Bilvosita nutqda (yoki bevosita bilvosita nutqda) ergash gapdagi fe'llar ham har doim subjunktiv kayfiyatda bo'ladi:

Caesar mihī ignōscit per litterās quod nōn uchun vēnerim (Tsitseron)^[248]

"Qaysar men kelmaganim uchun xat orqali meni kechirmoqda"

mea māter īrāta est quia nōn redierim (Plautus)^[249]

'Mening qaytib kelmaganim uchun onam g'azablandi'

Bundan keyin ham foydalanish mumkin quīn, ham asosiy, ham tarixiy fe'ldan keyin:

nōn dubitō quīn conquātissimus fuerīs (Tsitseron)^[250]

"Siz juda band bo'lganingizga shubha qilmayman" (asl nusxasi) eras yoki fuistī)

nēmō Lilybaeī fuit quīn vīderit (Tsitseron)^[251]

"Lilybaeumda buni ko'rmagan hech kim yo'q edi"

Shuningdek, u quyidagi kabi tarixiy fe'ldan keyin natija gapida ishlatilishi mumkin:

eō ūsque sē praebēbat patsientem atque impigrum ut eum nēmō umquam in equō sedentem vīderit (Tsitseron)^[252]

"u o'zini shu qadar qattiq va baquvvat ko'rsatdi, hech kim uni otda o'tirganini ko'rmadi"

Quyidagi gapda u keyin ishlatiladi quī nedensel ma'noda ("aslida" yoki "haqiqatni hisobga olgan holda"):^[253]

mē ko'r ichak quī haec ante nōn vīderim! (Tsitseron)^[254]

- Ko'r bo'lsam kerak, buni oldin ko'rmaganman!

Bundan tashqari, u amal qilishi mumkin quī cheklovchi bandda:^[255]

Catōnis ōrātiōnēs, quās quidem invēnerim (Tsitseron)^[256]

"Katonning nutqlari, hech bo'lmaganda men kashf etganim kabi"

Pluperfect subjunktiv

Mustaqil foydalanish

Mustaqil jumlalarda pluperfect subjunktivi "qilgan bo'lar edi", "qilgan bo'lishi mumkin", "qilgan bo'lishi mumkin" yoki "qilishi kerak edi" degan ma'noni anglatadi.

Umumiy ishlatilishlardan biri shartli gaplarda bo'lib, bu erda pluperfect subjunktive o'tmishda sodir bo'lishi mumkin bo'lgan, ammo bo'lmagan taxminiy hodisani ifodalash uchun ishlatiladi. Ushbu foydalanish Plautusda topilgan:^[257]

sī appellasss, javob berish (Plautus)^[258]

"Agar siz uni chaqirganingizda, u javob bergan bo'lar edi"

Kelgusi mukammal zamonning o'zgarishini ifodalaydigan yana bir foydalanish - bu hali amalga oshmaydigan taxminiy hodisani tasvirlash:

ergō egō nisī peperissem, Rōma nōn oppugnārētur; nisī fīlium habērem, lībera in līberā patriā mortua essem (Livi)^[259]

shuning uchun agar men tug'ilmaganimda, Rimga hujum qilishmaydi; agar o'g'lim bo'lmaganida, men erkin mamlakatda ozod ayol sifatida o'lgan bo'lar edim '

Shuningdek, u o'tmishda orzu qilingan, ammo sodir bo'lmagan taxminiy hodisani ifodalashi mumkin:

utinam ille omnīs sēcum suās cōpiās uxduxisset! (Tsitseron)^[260]

"Qani endi u hamma kuchlarini o'zi bilan birga olib chiqqanida edi!"

Qirolicha Dido quyidagi jumlaga "nima bo'lishi mumkin" haqida o'ylaydi:^[261]

kastradagi faces tulissem implēsemque forōs flammīs (Virgil)^[262]

"Men mash'alalarni lagerga olib borib, o't yo'llarini alanga bilan to'ldirishim mumkin edi"

Boshqalar bunday jumlalarda pluperfect subjunktivni istak sifatida ko'rishadi ("agar men ko'targan bo'lsam!"); boshqalar yana jussiv sifatida ("Men ko'tarishim kerak edi!").^[263]

Jussiv pluperfektning yanada aniq namunasi Sitseronning quyidagi misolida salbiydan foydalanilgan nē:^[264]

quid facere dēbuistī? pecūniam rettulissēs, frūmentum nē ē missēs (Tsitseron)^[265]

sizning vazifangiz nima edi? pulni qaytarishingiz kerak edi, makkajo'xori sotib olmaysiz "

Qaratilgan gaplarda

Qarama-qarshi gaplarda pluperfect subjunktivining eng keng tarqalgan ma'nosi "bajarilgan" dir.

Shartli bandda u aslida bo'lmagan gipotetik vaziyatni tasvirlaydi:

omnium cōnsēnsū capāx imperiī nisī imperasset (Tatsitus)^[266]

"Barchaning roziligi bilan, Galba hech qachon imperator bo'lishga qodir emas edi"

Pluperfect subjunktivining yana bir tez-tez ishlatilishidan keyin jum vaqtinchalik bandda:

quod jum aud_visset, aniqlik bilan Rōmam dīcitur (Tsitseron)^[267]

"buni eshitgach, u Rimga shoshildi"

Boshqa bir foydalanish, o'tmishdagi kontekstda bilvosita nutqda, bu erda pluperfect subjunktive ko'pincha to'g'ridan-to'g'ri nutqda mukammal ko'rsatkichni o'zgartiradi.^[268] Quyidagi misolda asl to'g'ridan-to'g'ri savol mukammal vaqtga ega bo'lar edi (fuistī):

quaesīvī ā Catilīnā, nocturnō conventū in apud M. Laecam fuizet bo'yin (Tsitseron)^[269]

"Men Katilindan Markus Lekaning uyida tungi uchrashuvda bo'lganmi yoki yo'qmi deb so'radim"

Ammo ba'zi jumlalarda pluperfect subjunktiv asl fe'llarning qaerda bo'lishini quyidagi misolda bo'lgani kabi asl nomukammal ko'rsatkichning aksidir. mīlitābamus va habēbamus:^[270]

[dīxit eōs] id tantum dēprecārī, nē fernferiōrēs iīs ordinēs quam quōs cum mīlitāssent odatiy adtribuantur (Livi)^[271]

"ular aytganidek, ular faqat bitta iltifotni iltimos qilishdi, ularga harbiy xizmatda bo'lgan vaqtlaridan past darajalar bermaslik kerak"

Boshqa jumlalarda pluperfect tarixiy ketma-ketlikka kiritilgan kelajakdagi mukammal ko'rsatkichning aksidir. Quyidagi jumlaning asl so'zlari taxmin qilingan bo'lishi mumkin tū, sī aliter fēcerīs, iniīriam Caesarī faciēs "agar boshqacha yo'l tutsangiz (qilgan bo'lsangiz ham), siz Qaysarga yomonlik qilasiz":

eum, sī aliter fēcisset, iniūriam Sezarī factīrum dīxit (Tsitseron)^[272]

"agar u kishi boshqacha yo'l tutsa, Qaysarga yomonlik qiladi", dedi u

Majburiy kayfiyat

The imperativ kayfiyat hozirgi va kelajakdagi ikki zamonga ega.

Hozirgi imperativ

Ijobiy buyruqlar

Hozirgi imperativ kayfiyat - bu ma'ruzachi birdaniga bajarilishini istagan to'g'ridan-to'g'ri buyruqlar berish uchun ishlatiladigan odatiy vaqt. Faol shaklni qo'shish orqali ko'plik shaklida qilish mumkin -te:

dā mī bāsia mīlle, deinde centum! (Katullus)^[273]

'menga ming o'p, keyin yuz o'p! "

sana dexterās fidemque! (Livi)^[274]

menga o'ng qo'llaringizni va qasamingizni bering!

Tarkibiy fe'llar kabi profitsor "Men yo'l oldim" yoki ketma-ket "Men ergashaman" degan buyruq bilan tugaydi -re yoki -minī (ko‘plik):

patent portalari: profisscere! (Tsitseron)^[275]

"eshiklar ochiq: keting!"

im mē hūc intrō ambae (Terens )^[276]

"ikkalangiz ham meni shu yo'l bilan kuzatib boring"

Salbiy buyruqlar

Imperativ odatda foydalanib salbiy bo'ladi nōlī (te) (so'zma-so'z "istamang!") Va infinitiv:

nōlīte miriy (Katta Seneka )^[277]

"hayron bo'lmang"

Biroq, she'riyatda ba'zan buyruq zarracha bilan salbiy bo'lishi mumkin nē:

nē mē terrēte timentem, obscēnae volucrēs! (Virgil)^[278]

- allaqachon qo'rqqan, behayo qushlar meni qo'rqitmang!

Salbiy buyurtma mukammal subjunktivdan ham foydalanishi mumkin:^[279]

dē mē nihil taymerlar (Tsitseron)^[280]

"mening hisobimdan qo'rqmang"

Keyinchalik lotin tilida, nē bundan tashqari, hozirgi subjunktiv keng tarqalgan, masalan, Vulgeyt Injilida.^[281] Quyidagi misolda birinchi uchta fe'l hozirgi zamon sub'ektini, uchinchisi esa mukammal sub'ektivni ishlatadi:

nē zinokorlar, nē oksidas, nē fūrēris, nē falsum guvohnomasi dīxerīs (Mark, 10.19)

"zino qilmang, o'ldirmang, o'g'irlamang, yolg'on guvohlik bermang"

Kelajak zarur

Lotin tilida Future imperative yoki 2-imperativ mavjud,^[282] tugaydi -tō (te), kelajakda biron bir narsani qilishni iltimos qilish uchun ishlatilgan yoki birinchi navbatda boshqa narsa yuz bergan bo'lsa:

sī quid acciderit, ... scrībitō (Tsitseron)^[283]

'agar biror narsa bo'lsa, menga yozing'

crās petitō, dabitur (Plautus)^[284]

'ertaga so'rang; u sizga beriladi '

Ushbu buyruq Plautus va Kato kabi dastlabki yozuvchilarda juda keng tarqalgan, ammo u Martial kabi keyingi yozuvchilarda ham uchraydi:

ubi nōs lāverimus, sī volēs, lavatiy (Terens)^[285]

"biz yuvib bo'lgach, agar xohlasangiz yuving"

crūdam si edēs, acētum bilan intizomō (Kato)^[286]

"agar siz (karam) xom ashyoni iste'mol qilsangiz, uni sirka ichiga soling"

rīdētō multum quī tē, Sextille, cinaedum / dīxerit et digitum porrigitō o'rta (Jangovar)^[287]

Sextillus, kulish sizni "fagot" deb ataydigan odamlarga baland ovozda va ko'rsatish ularni o'rta barmoq '

Ba'zi fe'llar faqat ikkinchi buyruqqa ega, masalan scītō "bilaman", yodgorlikō "eslayman".^[288]

3-shaxs rasmiy imperativ

So'zlashuv kelajagi imperativi bilan bog'liq bo'lib, Tsitseronning ushbu ixtiro qilingan qonunida bo'lgani kabi yuridik tilning rasmiy buyrug'i (odatda 3-shaxsda ishlatiladi). de Ligibus:

rēgiō imperiō dueti suntō, iīque ... ā cōnsulendō cōnsulēs appellāminō; nēminī pārentō; ollīs salūs populī suprēma lēx estō (Tsitseron)^[289]

shoh hokimiyatiga ega bo'lgan ikki kishi bo'ladi; va konsullikdan ular "konsul" deb nomlanishi kerak; ular hech kimga bo'ysunmasliklari kerak; ular uchun xalq farovonligi oliy qonun bo'lishi kerak '

J.G.F. Pauell, appellāminō haqiqiy arxaik shakl emas; lotin tilida -minō faqat saqlovchi fe'llarda ishlatiladi va 2 yoki 3 shaxs birlikda bo'ladi.^[290]

Perifrastik zamonlar

Bir qator perifrastik zamonlar kelasi zamon kesimini birlashtirib tuzilishi mumkin (masalan.) kanal "etakchilik qilish") yoki gerundiv (masalan, dendsendus "rahbarlik qilish kerak") fe'lning har qanday zamoni bilan sum "Men", quyidagicha:

Perifrastik zamonlar
	Faol	Ma'nosi	Passiv	Ma'nosi
Hozir	kanal summasi	Men rahbarlik qilmoqchiman	dendend summasi	Meni olib borish kerak
Kelajak	ductūrus erō	Men etakchilik qilaman	dūcendus erō	Menga rahbarlik qilish kerak bo'ladi
Nomukammal	ductūrus eram	Men rahbarlik qilmoqchi edim	dūcendus eram	Menga rahbarlik qilish kerak edi
Zo'r	duktrus fuī	Men rahbarlik qilmoqchi edim	dūcendus fuī	Menga rahbarlik qilish kerak edi
Kelajak mukammaldir	(misol yo'q)		dūcendus fuerō	Menga rahbarlik qilish kerak bo'ladi
Pluperfect	duktrus fueram	Men rahbarlik qilmoqchi edim	dūcendus eram	Menga rahbarlik qilish kerak edi

Hozirgi subj.	ductūrus sim	Men rahbarlik qilmoqchiman	dūcendus sim	Meni olib borish kerak
Nomukammal subj.	ductūrus essem	Men rahbarlik qilmoqchi edim	dūcendus essem	Menga rahbarlik qilish kerak edi
Zo'r subj.	ductūrus fuerim	Men olib borgan bo'lardim	dūcendus fuerim	Menga rahbarlik qilish kerak edi
Pluperfect subj.	ductūrus fuissem	Men rahbarlik qilmoqchi edim	dūcendus fuissem	Menga rahbarlik qilish kerak edi

Gerundiv bilan hosil qilingan passiv zamonlar "passivning perifrastik konjugatsiyasi" deb nomlanadi.^[291]

Ikki qator tashqi ko'rinishiga o'xshash bo'lsa-da, ular ma'no yoki funktsiya jihatidan parallel emas. Vudkok passiv shakl haqida shunday yozadi: "Ammo zarurat g'oyasini joriy etish uchun u perifrastik kelajakka parallel ravishda perifrastik kelajak passiv vaqtni hosil qiladi".^[292] Shu sababli, gerundival perifrastik zamonlarining misollari quyida alohida bo'limda to'plangan.

Perifrastik indikativ

Perifrastik kelajak

Kelajakdagi perifrastikaning hozirgi versiyasi hozirgi paytda odamning niyatini tasvirlaydi:

Polla Valeriya ... nūptūra est D. Brutu (Tsitseron)^[293]

'Polla Valeriya Decimus Brutus bilan turmush qurishni rejalashtirmoqda'

nisī explicātā solūtiōne nōn summa disessurasi (Tsitseron)^[294]

'Pul to'lamaguncha ketmoqchi emasman'

Kelajak perifrastik kelajak

Nomiga qaramay, kelajakdagi perifrastik zamon fakt summasi haqiqatan ham hozirgi zamon, odamning hozirgi niyatlarini tavsiflaydi. Shu sababli, u kelajakdagi shaklga ega bo'lishi mumkin faktūrus erōMasalan, kelgusi shartli yoki kelasi zamon gaplarida ishlatiladi:

siz Sīliō bilan birga bo'lasiz, va biz illō ipsō diē quō ventūrus erō, certiōrem mē velim faciās (Tsitseron)^[295]

"agar siz Silius bilan kelishgan bo'lsangiz, hatto kelishim kerak bo'lgan kuni bo'lsa ham, iltimos, menga xabar bering"

Nomukammal perifrastik kelajak

Perifrastik kelajakning o'tgan versiyasi nomukammal zamon bilan tuzilishi mumkin sum, o'tmishdagi bir lahzada kimningdir niyati qanday bo'lganligini tasvirlab berib:

Italiya va boshqa versiyalarida nāvigātūrus erat (Serviusdan Tsitseronga)^[296]

"ertasi kuni u Italiyaga suzib ketmoqchi edi"

ut vērō vultūs et cornua vīdit in undā, 'my miserum!' dictūrus erat: vōx nūlla secūta est (Ovid)^[297]

U yuzida va shoxlarini suvda ko'rganida, "ey bechora, men!" u aytmoqchi edi, ammo hech qanday so'z chiqmadi '

Shartli gapda bu zamon "qilgan bo'lar edi" degan ma'noni anglatishi mumkin:^[298]

āmendatūrus, sī licuisset, eram (Ovid)^[299]

"Agar men buni amalga oshirishga qodir bo'lsam, xatolarni yo'q qilgan bo'lardim"

Perifrastik kelajak

Perifrastik kelajakka qaraganda kamroq tarqalgan bo'lsa-da eram, perifrastik kelajakning mukammal zamon versiyasi ham topilgan:^[300]

quō diē repulsus est, lūsit, quā nocte peritūrus fuit, lēgit (Seneka)^[301]

kuni Kato saylovlarda mag'lub bo'ldi, u o'ynadi; u o'lishni niyat qilgan kecha u o'qidi '

Ushbu zamon potentsial bo'lishi mumkin, bu "qilgan bo'lar edi" degan ma'noni anglatadi:

sī tibī nōn pāruissem, iūre datūrus fuī poenās (Kurtiy )^[302]

"agar men sizga itoat etmaganimda, jazoni to'lagan bo'lardim"

Pluperfect perifrastik kelajak

quem senātus dictātōrem dīcī iussūrus fuerat (Livi)^[303]

'... Senat buyruq bermoqchi bo'lganlar diktator deb e'lon qilinishi kerak'

Perifrastik subjunktiv

Bilvosita bayonotlar va savollarda faol perifrastik kelajak to'g'ridan-to'g'ri nutqning kelajakdagi yoki perifrastik kelajakdagi vaqtini birlamchi ketma-ketlikda ifodalashi mumkin. Bunday holda, rejalashtirish yoki niyat qilish to'g'risida hech qanday fikr yo'q, garchi quyidagilar bo'lishi mumkin:^[304]

tē īī vīsūrus sim, nesciō (Tsitseron)^[305]

"Seni qachon ko'rishni bilmayman"

italiyada quid agātis et ecquid ventūrī sītis hāc hieme, fac plānē sciam (Tsitseron)^[306]

"nima qilayotganingizni va bu qishda Italiyaga kelishni rejalashtirayotganligingizni batafsil aytib bering"

Ushbu zamon, shuningdek, asosiy shartni ideal shartli gapda yoki kelajakdagi sodda gapda ifodalash uchun birlamchi ketma-ketlikdagi nutqda ishlatilishi mumkin (grammatikaga ko'ra, bilvosita nutqda bu ikkalasining farqi yo'qoladi):^[307]

quem adhūc nōs quidem vīdimus nēminem; sed philosophōrum sententiīs, quālis hic futūrus o'tirish, sī modō aliquandō fuerit, expōnitur (Tsitseron)^[308]

'biz o'zimiz hech qachon bunday (mukammal dono) odamni ko'rmaganmiz; ammo faylasuflarning fikrlarida bunday odam nima ekanligini tushuntiradi bo'lardi kabi, agar u hech qachon mavjud bo'lsa edi '

Perifrastik nomukammal subjunktiv

Agar asosiy fe'l o'tmishda bo'lsa, perifrastik kelajak subjunktivining nomukammal versiyasi ishlatiladi:

dubitābam tū hās ipsās litterās esselarne qabul qilish (Tsitseron)^[309]

"Sizga bu xatni kelishini bilmasdim"

Bilan nomukammal perifrastik subjunktivni hosil qilish ham mumkin bashorat o'rniga esset (buning birinchi misoli Sallustda):^[310]

dīcit sē vēnisse quaesītum ab eō, pācem an bellum agitaturus bashorati (Sallust)^[311]

"u sulh tuzmoqchimisiz yoki urush qilyapsizmi, deb so'rash uchun kelganini aytdi"

Perifrastik mukammal subjunktiv

Mukammal perifrastik subjunktiv bilvosita savollarda birlamchi ketma-ketlikda gipotetik shartli gaplarda shartli ma'noda ("qilgan bo'lar edi") ishlatilishi mumkin. Bunday holda u asl to'g'ridan-to'g'ri nutqda pluperfect subjunktivni ifodalaydi:^[312]

dīc yoshli, Appe-Klod, kvidnam factūrus fuerīs, sī eō tempore cēnsor fuissēs? (Livi)^[313]

- aytingchi, Appius Klavdiy, agar siz bo'lganingizda nima qilgan bo'lar edingiz? tsenzura shu vaqtda?'

potest quisquam dubitāre quīn, sī Italiyada Q. Ligarius esse potuisset, eādem sententiā futūrus fuerit quā frātrēs fuērunt-da? (Tsitseron)^[314]

agar kimdir bunga shubha qilsa Kvintus Ligarius agar u Italiyada bo'lishi mumkin bo'lsa, u akalari kabi bir xil fikrda bo'larmidi? »

Bilvosita savolda mukammal perifrastik subjunktiv ba'zan potentsial nomukammal sub'ektivni ham aks ettirishi mumkin:^[315]

cōgitā kvanti qo'shimchalar celeritātī fuerīs, sī ā tergō hostis īnstāret (Seneka)^[316]

'Agar dushman sizni orqangizdan qo'rqitayotgan bo'lsa, siz qanchalik tezlikni bosib o'tishingizni tasavvur qiling!

Ushbu zamonlarni o'xshash misollar bilan quyida keltirilgan mukammal perifrastik infinitiv bilan taqqoslash mumkin, bu erda nomukammal subjunktivlarda qilingan shartli jumla bilvosita gapga aylantiriladi.

Perifrastik pluperfect subjunktiv

Perifrastik subjunktivning pluperfektsiyali versiyasi vaziyatda ishlatilishi mumkin jum band:

jum dē rē pūblicā relātūrus fuisset, adlati nūntiō dē legiōne quārtā mente concidit (Tsitseron)^[317]

'qachon Antoniy respublika haqida biroz harakat qilmoqchi edi, to'satdan 4-legion haqida xabar keldi va u o'zini yo'qotdi '

Dan keyin shartli gaplarda ham ishlatilishi mumkin sī, dan kelgan xayoliy maktubdan quyidagi jumlaga o'xshab Xelen Parijga:

h egos ego blanditiīs, sī peccatūra fuissem, flecterer (Ovid)^[318]

"bu kabi xushomadgo'ylik bilan, agar gunoh qilganimda edi, meni ishontirishlari mumkin edi"

Bundan tashqari, bilvosita savolda potentsial pluperfect subjunktivini ("qilgan bo'lar edi") tarixiy ketma-ketlikda aks ettirishi mumkin:^[319]

subībat cōgitātiō animum quōnam modō tolerābilis futūra Etrria fuizet, sī quid in Samniō adversī ēvēnisset (Livi)^[320]

"agar ular Samniumda biron bir xatoga yo'l qo'ygan bo'lsa, Etruriya imkonsiz bo'lar edi"

Gerundiv zamonlari

Hozirgi gerundive

The gerundiv fe'lning (bilan tugaydigan sifatlovchi shakli) -ndus) fe'l bilan birlashtirilishi mumkin sum Passiv perifrastik zamon yasash uchun "men". Bu odatda nima qilish kerakligini ifodalaydi:

ego nek rogandus summasi nek hortandus (Pliniy)^[321]

"Meni so'rash yoki rag'batlantirishning hojati yo'q" (ya'ni men buni bajonidil qilaman)

hī tumōres incīdendī sunt (Celsus )^[322]

"ushbu turdagi o'smalarni moliyalashtirish kerak"

Salbiy

Salbiy gerundiv odatda yuqoridagi birinchi misolda bo'lgani kabi "bo'lishga hojat yo'q" degan ma'noni anglatadi. Biroq, ba'zida "bo'lmasligi kerak" yoki "buning iloji yo'q" talqini ko'proq mos keladi:

illud enim iam nōn es admonendus nēminem bonum esse nisī sapientem (Seneka)^[323]

"dono odamdan boshqa hech kim yaxshi emasligini endi eslatishning hojati yo'q"

Callimachī raqamlari nōn est dīcendus Axill (Ovid)

"Axilles haqidagi voqeani Kallimaxning hisoblagichidan foydalanib aytmaslik kerak (yoki mumkin emas)"

Shaxssiz qurilish

Juda tez-tez passiv perifrastik shaxsning nomidan va agentning ko'rsatmasi bilan ishlatiladi:

vōbīs hodiernō diē cōnstituendum est (Tsitseron)^[324]

"bugun siz qaror qabul qilishingiz kerak"

Kabi zamonning shaxssiz shakli, shuningdek, o`tmaydigan fe'llar bilan ham tuzilishi mumkin eō 'Men boraman' va shunga o'xshash fe'llar ishontirish "Men ishontiraman" va ūtor Uyg'unlashtiruvchi ob'ektni qabul qilmaydigan "foydalanaman":^[325]

nōn eng yaxshi javob ad omnia (Tsitseron)^[326]

"hamma narsaga javob berishning hojati yo'q"

mihī Arpīnum eundum est (Tsitseron)^[327]

"Arpinumga borishim kerak"

ubī endumtestend est, acētō dīluuntur (Celsus)^[328]

"ulardan foydalanish zarurati tug'ilganda, bu moddalar sirka bilan suyultiriladi"

Kelajak gerundive

Kelajakdagi gerundiv perifrastikaning namunasi quyidagilar:

quoniam id quidem potest emas, eritrandus eritiladi nōbīs amīcus meus, M. Plaetōrius (Tsitseron)^[329]

"chunki bu mumkin emas, biz do'stim Markus Plaetoriusdan so'rashimiz kerak bo'ladi"

Nomukammal gerundive

Nomukammal passiv perifrastikaga quyidagilarni misol qilish mumkin:

timēbat, nōn ea sōlum quae timenda erant, sed omnia (Tsitseron)^[330]

"u nafaqat qo'rqish kerak bo'lgan narsalardan, balki hamma narsadan qo'rqardi"

Zo'r gerundiv

Aktiv mukammal perifrastikada bo'lgani kabi, shartli gapda mukammal gerundiv perifrastik zamon "qilgan bo'lar edim" degan ma'noni anglatishi mumkin:^[331]

sī ūnum diem morātī essētis, moriendum omnibus fitna (Livi)^[332]

"agar siz bir kunni kechiktirsangiz, barchangiz o'lgan bo'lar edingiz"

Mukammal passivning yana bir ma'nosi - "bajarilishi kerak":

aut mashqlar adimendus aut imperium dandum fitosi (Tsitseron)^[333]

"yoki uning qo'shini olib ketilishi kerak edi yoki unga buyruq berilishi kerak edi"

Quyidagi natija bandida ushbu zamon sub'unktiv bo'ladi:

dē Pomptīnō rēctē scrībis. est enim ita ut, sī ante Kal. Iūniās Brundisī futurus minus, minus tezkorī fuerint M. Anneius va L. Tullius (Tsitseron)

"Pomptinus haqida yozganlaringiz to'g'ri: natijada agar u 1 iyundan oldin Brundisiumda bo'lgan bo'lsa, Markus Anneus va Lutsiy Tulusni shoshiltirishga unchalik ehtiyoj qolmadi"

Future mukammal gerundive

Faol kelajakdagi mukammal perifrastik zamon topilmadi, ammo passiv paydo bo'ladi:

jum aedificandum fuerit, ante biennium ea saxa eximantur (Vitruvius)^[334]

"har qanday bino kerak bo'lganda (mahalliy toshdan foydalangan holda), u uchun toshlar ikki yil oldin qazib olinishi kerak"

Vaqtlarning ketma-ketligi qoidalar

Lotin ma'ruzachilari savollar, bayonotlar va fikrlar haqida xabar berish uchun sub'ektiv fe'llardan foydalanganlar. Dominant gapda gapirish yoki so`rash fe`li birlamchi bo`lsa, tobe gapdagi tobe fe'l ham asosiy bo`lishi kerak; dominant gapdagi fe'l tarixiy bo'lganida, qaram gapdagi bo'ysunuvchi fe'l ham tarixiy zamonda bo'lishi kerak. Ushbu qoidani quyidagi jadval bilan aks ettirish mumkin:^[335]

Vaqtlarning ketma-ketligi qoidalar
	Asosiy fe'l	Mustaqil fe'l
Asosiy vaqtlar	Hozir Kelajak Future Perfect (Mukammal)	Hozirgi zamon sub'ektivligi Zo'r subjunktiv
Tarixiy zamonlar	Zo'r Nomukammal Pluperfect Tarixiy infinitiv	Nomukammal subjunktiv Pluperfect subjunktiv

Ushbu qoida qaram fe'l subjunktiv kayfiyatda qo'yilgan har qanday jumlaga, masalan, bilvosita nutq, bilvosita savollar, bilvosita buyruqlar, maqsad gaplar, ketma-ket kelgan gaplar, qo'rqish fe'llaridan keyingi gaplar uchun qo'llaniladi. quīn bandlar va boshqalar. Bu fe'lning indikativ tarkibida bo'lgan nisbiy ergash gaplar singari, erkinroq bog'langan gaplarga yoki bilvosita gapdagi qaram infinitivga taalluqli emas.

Hozirgi mukammal ma'noga ("qildim", asosiy) yoki o'tmishdagi oddiy ma'noga ("qildim", tarixiy) qarab, mukammal zamon har ikki qatorda ham paydo bo'ladi. Ammo hozirgi mukammal ma'noga ega bo'lsa ham, u ko'pincha tarixiy zamon sifatida qaraladi (quyida quyida ko'rib chiqing).

Birlamchi ketma-ketlikning namunalari

Birlamchi ketma-ketlikning ba'zi bir misollari quyidagilar:

Hozirgi indikativ + hozirgi subjunktiv:

quaerunt ubī o'tirish (Tsitseron)^[336]

"ular qaerdaligini so'rashadi"

Hozirgi zamon + hozirgi zamon sub'ektivligi:

velim vērum o'tirish (Tsitseron)^[337]

"Umid qilamanki bu haqiqat"

Hozirgi imperativ + perifrastik mukammal subjunktiv:

dīc quid factūrus fuerīs? (Livi)^[338]

"nima qilgan bo'lardingiz, bizga ayting"

Hozirgi indikativ + Perfect subjunktiv:

mīror quid causae fuerit quā rē cōnsilium mūtārīs (Tsitseron)^[339]

"Sizning rejangizni o'zgartirganingizning sababi nima edi?"

Tarixiy ketma-ketlikning namunalari

Xabar berilgan savol:

quaerēbātur ubī esset (Tsitseron)^[340]

"odamlar uning qaerdaligini so'rashdi"

Nomukammal subjunktiv + pluperfect subjunktiv:

vellem vērum fuizet (Tsitseron)^[341]

"Koshki bu haqiqat bo'lsa edi"

Zo'r indikativ + nomukammal subjunktiv:

senatus dēcrēvit ut statim yaxshi (Tsitseron)^[342]

"Senat birdaniga borishi to'g'risida qaror chiqardi"

Tarixiy infinitiv + nomukammal subjunktiv:^[343]

hortārī, utī semper maqsadi paratīque mohiyat (Sallust)^[344]

"U doimo ularni doimo ehtiyot bo'lishga va tayyor bo'lishga da'vat etdi"

Perfect tense asosiy fe'l

Asosiy fe'l mukammal zamon bo'lsa, odatda yuqoridagi misolda bo'lgani kabi tarixiy zamon deb hisoblanadi. Ba'zan, agar ingliz tilidagi hozirgi ma'no mukammal bo'lsa, asosiy banddagi mukammallik asosiy zamon sifatida qabul qilinishi mumkin, masalan:^[345]

nōndum satis ōnstituī molestiaene plūs voluptātis attulerit Trebatius noster (Tsitseron)^[346]

"Do'stimiz Trebatius menga ko'proq kulfat yoki zavq keltirdimi yoki yo'qmi, men hali o'z fikrimni aniq bilmaganman"

mē maqtov domum haec ut nūntiem uxōrī suae (Plautus)^[347]

"u bu xabarni xotiniga etkazishim uchun u meni oldinda uyiga jo'natdi"

Ammo hozirgi mukammal ma'noga ega bo'lgan mukammallikdan keyingi tarixiy ketma-ketlik ham juda keng tarqalgan,^[348]^[349] masalan:

ekzistoristī ut semirroq (Tsitseron)^[350]

"meni tan olishga majbur qildingiz"

tandem impetrāvī abīret (Plautus)^[351]

"nihoyat men uni ketishga majbur qildim!"

Tarixiy hozirgi asosiy fe'l

Asosiy fe'l tarixiy hozirgi bo'lsa, qaram fe'l asosiy yoki tarixiy bo'lishi mumkin, lekin odatda asosiy hisoblanadi:^[352]

nuntium mittit ... ut veniant (Livi)^[353]

"u kelishi kerakligi to'g'risida xabar yuboradi" (ikkala fe'l asosiy)

lēgātōs mittunt quī pacem yoqimli (Livi)^[354]

"ular tinchlik so'rash uchun elchilarni yuboradilar" (ikkinchi fe'l tarixiy)

Ba'zida birlamchi va tarixiy bir jumla ichida topiladi. Quyidagi misolda birinchi qaram fe'l crat asosiy ketma-ketlik, ammo dīxisset juda yaxshi:^[355]

rogat ut crat quod dīxisset (Tsitseron)^[356]

"u undan aytganlariga e'tibor berishni iltimos qildi"

Istisnolar

Vaqt qoidalari ketma-ketligi, ayniqsa bilvosita nutqdan tashqari, tez-tez istisnolar mavjud. Masalan, quyidagi jumlaga tarixiy zamon mukammal ergash gap bilan kelgan:^[357]

quis mīles fitna quī Brundisī illam non vīderit? (Tsitseron)^[358]

"uni Brundisiumda ko'rmagan qaysi askar bor edi?"

Ketma-ket gaplarda ham bosh gapdagi mukammal zamon ko'pincha hozirgi yoki mukammal ergash gap bilan keladi:^[359]

[Siciliam Verrēs] per triennium ita vexavit ut ea restituī antīquum status nōn da mulk (Tsitseron)^[360]

- Verres Sitsiliyani uch yil davomida shunchalik tinimsiz ishladiki, uni asl holiga qaytarib bo'lmaydi.

Boshqa bir istisno shundaki, asl jumlaga allaqachon bo'ysungan gapdagi nomukammal yoki pluperfect subjunkt ko'pincha hatto asosiy ketma-ketlikda qolishi mumkin:

dīc quid factūrus fuerīs sī cēnsor fuissēs? (Livi)^[361]

'agar senzura bo'lganingizda nima qilgan bo'lardingiz?

Aksincha, bunday shartli gaplarda perifrastik mukammal subjunktiv tarixiy-zamon asosiy fe'lidan keyin ham qolishi mumkin:^[362]

nec dubium erat quīn, sī possent, terga datūrī xostlar fuerint (Livi)^[363]

"agar ular qodir bo'lganlarida, dushmanlar qochib ketishi mumkinligiga shubha yo'q edi"

Zo'r zamon potuerim shuningdek, pluperfect zamonini "bo'lishi mumkin" ma'nosi bilan almashtirishi mumkin:^[364]

haud dubium fuit quīn, nisi ea mora intervēnisset, castra eō diē Pūnica capī potuerit (Livi)^[365]

"shubha yo'q edi, agar bu kechikish aralashmasa, Karfagen lageri o'sha kuni qo'lga olinishi mumkin edi"

Umuman olganda, Livida asl nutqning hozirgi yoki mukammal zamoni yuqoridagi misolda bo'lgani kabi tarixiy ketma-ketlikda saqlanib qolish tendentsiyasi mavjud, Tsitseron esa tarixiy ketma-ketlikni qat'iyroq bajaradi.^[366]

Qaysar va Sallust ba'zan ma'no jussiv bo'lsa ham, hozirgi subjunktivni tarixiy ketma-ketlikda ishlatishi mumkin (garchi bu amaliyot har doim ham amal qilinmasa ham):^[367]

Answerit sī quid ab senātū petere vellent, ab armīs noqulay (Sallust)^[368]

"agar ular Senatdan biron bir iltimos qilishni xohlasalar, qurolsizlanishlari kerak", deb javob berdi u

Infinitiv

Umumiy nuqtai

Infinitivning turli vaqtlari quyidagicha:

Infinitiv zamonlar
	Faol	Ma'nosi	Passiv	Ma'nosi
Hozir	amore vidēre dūcere fasere audīre esse posse velle nōlle mol īre ferre	sevmoq ko'rish uchun rahbarlik qilmoq qilmoq eshitmoq bolmoq qila olmoq xohlamoq xohlamaslik afzal qilmoq bormoq olib kelmoq	amori vidērī dūcī fierī audīrī īrī ferrī	sevilmoq ko'rish uchun rahbarlik qilish bajarilishi kerak eshitish – olib kelish
Zo'r	dūxisse	rahbarlik qilgan	ductum esse	bo'lishi kerak edi
Kelajak	ductūrum esse	etakchilik qilmoq	duktum īrī	olib borilishi kerak
Zo'r perifrastik	ductūrum fuisse	rahbarlik qilmoqchi bo'lgan
Kelajak mukammaldir perifrastik			old kanal^[369]	bormoq olib borildi
Gerundive sovg'asi			dūclament esse	etakchilikka muhtoj bo'lish
Gerundive mukammal			dūkendiment fuisse	bo'lishi kerak edi rahbarlik qilish kerak
Gerundive kelajak			d) oldingi referendum	bormoq rahbarlik qilish kerak

Hozirgi passiv va tarkibiy infinitiv odatda tugaydi -rī (masalan, amori "sevilmoq", pollicērī 'to word'), lekin 3-chi konjugatsiya fe'llarida -ī faqat (masalan, capī "qo'lga olish", sequī 'ergashmoq'). Passiv īrī shaxssiz ishlatiladi:

sēda sitnsit īrī Brutus (Livi)^[370]

"Brutus unga hujum qilinayotganini payqadi"

1-chi konjugatsiya fe'llarida, tugatish -āvisse juda tez-tez qisqartiriladi -Asse, masalan. amasse "sevgan".

Infinitives sum "Men" esse 'bolmoq', xushbichim "bo'lishi kerak" va futūrum esse (ko'pincha qisqartiriladi oldingi) "bo'lishi kerak". Boshqa noqonuniy infinitivlar posse (ba'zan Plautus va Lukretsiyda) potess) "qodir bo'lish" va albatta/yana 'yemoq'.

Noto'g'ri fe'llar possum "Men qodirman" va volō "Men xohlayman" kelajakda infinitiv yo'q. Ushbu fe'llarda o'rniga hozirgi infinitiv ishlatiladi.^[371]

Lotin tilida (ayniqsa Plautus) passiv va deponent infinitivi ko'pincha tugaydi -ier: vituperārier "tanbeh berish", vidērier "ko'rish", nancīscier "olish", tajriba "uyg'onish" va boshqalar.

Murakkab infinitivlar

Murakkab infinitivlar odatda yuqoridagi jadvalda ko'rsatilgandek, orttirma gapda uchraydi. Ba'zida ular nominativda uchraydi, masalan dīcitur "u aytilgan" yoki vidētur "u ko'rinadi":

ventūrus esse dīcitur (Tsitseron)^[372]

"u kelishni rejalashtirmoqda"

Qism quyidagicha bo'lgani kabi, shuningdek, jins va ko'plikni ko'rsatish uchun o'zgarishi mumkin faktlar ayol ko'pligi:

idinsidiās factās esse cnnstat (Tsitseron)^[373]

"pistirma qilinganligi to'g'risida kelishib olindi"

Biroq, passiv kelajak infinitivi (duktum īrī) yordamida amalga oshiriladi supin fe'lning. -xm shuning uchun doimiy bo'lib qoladi va jinsi yoki soni bo'yicha o'zgarmaydi.

Kelajak infinitivi faqat bilvosita bayonotlar uchun ishlatiladi (pastga qarang).^[374]

O'tkazib yuborish esse

Ko'pincha esse qo'shma infinitivning bir qismi chiqarib tashlandi:

fratrem interfektum audīvit (Seneka)^[375]

"u akasini o'ldirganini eshitdi"

kandum sibī aliquid Pompeius exstimāvit (Qaysar)^[376]

"Pompey nimanidir sinab ko'rishi kerak deb hisobladi"

cōnfīdo mē celeriter ad urbem shamollatish (Tsitseron)^[377]

"Men tez orada shaharga kelishimga aminman"

Tarixiy infinitiv

Infinitiv vaqti-vaqti bilan rivoyatda o'ziga xos zamon sifatida ishlatiladi. Odatda, xuddi shu harakat bir necha bor takrorlanadigan sahnani tasvirlaydi. Ko'pincha ketma-ket ikki yoki undan ortiq tarixiy infinitivlar mavjud:^[378]

tum spectāculum lagerning patentida dahshatli: sequī, fugere, okīdī, capī (Sallust)^[379]

"keyin ochiq tekislikda dahshatli tomosha bo'lib o'tdi: odamlar quvib, qochib, o'ldirilmoqda va qo'lga olindi"

clamora ille, cum raperētur, nihil sē miserum fēcisse (Tsitseron)^[380]

- kambag'al hech narsa qilmadim deb sudrab ketayotganda baqirib yubordi

'Bajarishi mumkin', 'Bajarishi kerak'

Zo'r zamon potuī infinitiv bilan ko'pincha "men bajardim" yoki "men bunga erishdim" degan ma'noni anglatishi mumkin:

Scīpio P. Rupilium kostyum cōnsulem samarali, frātrem eius Lūcium nōn potuit (Tsitseron)^[381]

"Skipio Publius Rupiliusni konsul qilib olishga muvaffaq bo'ldi, ammo u Rupiliyning ukasi Lutsiy uchun ham bunday qilolmadi"

Shu bilan birga, bu "men qilgan bo'lardim (lekin qilmadim)" degan ma'noni ham anglatishi mumkin:

quī fuī va quī esse potuī iam esse nōn possum (Tsitseron)^[382]

'Men nima edim va nima bo'lishim mumkin edi, endi men bo'la olmayman'

Shuningdek, u o'tmishdagi haqiqiy bo'lmagan shartli jumlalarda "метавонист edi" ma'nosida ishlatilishi mumkin:^[383]

Antōnī gladiōs potuit contemnere, sī sīc omnia dīxisset (Juvenal)^[384]

'(Tsitseron) xor bo'lishi mumkin edi Antoniy Agar u hamma narsani shu tarzda gapirganida edi, qilichlari (ya'ni ulardan qo'rqish uchun hech qanday sabab yo'q edi)!

quaeris quid potuerit amplius keyingi Plancius, sī Cn. Scīpionis fuisset fīlius (Tsitseron)^[385]

"Agar siz Gney Skipioning o'g'li bo'lganida, Plantsiy yana qanday yutuqlarga erishishi mumkin edi"

"Bajarilishi kerak" ko'pincha o'tgan zamon bilan ifodalanadi dēbeō "Mening burchim" yoki oportet hozirgi infinitiv bilan "mos keladi":

senatumda venīre illō diē nōn dēbuistī (Tsitseron)^[386]

"sen o'sha kuni senatga kelmasliging kerak edi"

etsī scrībere reklama tē suyuq oportēbat, tamen adhūc id non fēceram (Tsitseron)^[387]

"garchi men sizga biron bir narsa yozishim kerak bo'lsa-da, hali yozganim yo'q" (epistolyar pluperfect)

Ba'zan, tanish uslubda, oportuit mukammal infinitiv passiv bilan ishlatilishi mumkin:^[388]

(hoc) iam prīdem factum esse oportuit (Tsitseron)^[389]

"buni oldin qilish kerak edi"

Bilvosita bayonot

Infinitiv bilvosita gaplarda asosiy fe'l uchun juda ko'p ishlatiladi. Passiv gaplarni ishlatishdan tashqari dīcitur "u aytilgan" yoki vidētur "u tuyuladi" va shunga o'xshash narsalar keltirilgan jumlaning predmeti ergash gap tarkibiga kiritilib, konstruktsiyasi "bo'ysunuvchi va infinitiv" sifatida tanilgan.

Vaqt qoidasi shundaki, hozirgi infinitiv asosiy fe'l bilan zamonaviy bo'lgan har qanday harakat yoki vaziyat uchun ishlatiladi, asosiy fe'ldan oldingi harakatlar yoki vaziyatlar uchun mukammal, kelajak fe'l esa asosiy fe'ldan keyinroq harakatlar yoki vaziyatlar uchun.^[390] Ushbu qoida uchun istisno fe'ldir meminī "Eslayman", bu shaxsiy eslashdan foydalanilganda (masalan, "hozir bo'lganligimni eslayman") keyin hozirgi infinitiv keladi.^[391]

Fe'llar iubeō "Men buyurtma qilaman" va volō Biroq, "istayman" degan so'zni doimo hozirgi infinitiv kuzatib boradi. Ba'zan policeor "Va'da beraman" va meminī "Men tahdid qilaman", agar hech qanday ayblov predmeti qo'shilmasa, hozirgi infinitiv bilan kelishi mumkin.^[392]^[393]

Hozirgi infinitiv

Hozirgi infinitiv gap yoki fe'l bilan bir vaqtda harakat yoki vaziyatni ifodalash uchun ishlatiladi:

Solōn furere sē simulāvit (Tsitseron)^[394]

'Solon o'zini aqldan ozgandek ko'rsatdi'

sēnsit sē petī (Nepos)^[395]

'(Gannibal) uni qidirayotganini tushundi'

Hozirgi infinitiv keyin ishlatiladi meminī shaxsiy eslashni tasvirlashda:^[396]

meminī mē ichki scholam eius, Milōnem-da recitātūrus esset (Seneka oqsoqol)^[397]

"Men Miloga qarshi nutq aytmoqchi bo'lganida, uning maktabiga kirganimni eslayman"

Shuningdek, u fe'llar bilan qilingan bilvosita buyruqlarda mavjud bo'lgan imperativ (yoki jussive subjunctive) ifodalaydi iubeō "Men buyurtma qilaman" va vetō "Men taqiqlayman":^[398]

har bir kastra uchun dūcī, ī hamma narsa mashqlar, qo'zg'aluvchanlik dmittī (Evtropiy)^[399]

U ularni lager orqali olib borishni, butun qo'shinni ko'rsatishni va keyin ishdan bo'shatishni buyurdi.

Mukammal infinitiv

Bilvosita bayonotda mukammal infinitiv nutq fe'lidan oldingi har qanday voqea yoki vaziyatni ifodalaydi:

lictōrem tuum oksesum esse dīcis (Tsitseron)^[400]

"sizning tansoqchingiz o'ldirilgan deb aytasiz"

Sezaremni ovlash vnisse ([Qaysar])^[401]

"ular Qaysar kelganini bilishdi"

mihī nūntiāvit M. Marcellum pugiōne perkussum esse et duo zaif accispisse (Serviusdan Tsitseronga)^[402]

u menga Marcus Marcellusni xanjar bilan urib yuborganligi va ikkita jarohat olganligi to'g'risida xabar keltirdi '

Ko'pincha gaplashish fe'llari chiqarib tashlanadi:

rem atrōcem inkisis (Livi)^[403]

"dahshatli narsa yuz berdi" (u aytdi)

Ba'zan mukammal infinitiv ingliz tilida doimiy vaqt bilan tarjima qilinishi mumkin:

reperiēbat T. Ampium cōnātum esse pecūnias tollere Ephesō ex fānō Diānae (Qaysar)^[404]

"Titus Ampius Efesdagi Diana ibodatxonasidan pul o'g'irlamoqchi bo'lganligini aniqladi"

Kelajak infinitivi

Kelajak infinitivi nutq fe'lidan keyin sodir bo'ladigan xabar qilingan nutqdagi voqealar yoki vaziyatlar uchun ishlatiladi:

cōnfīdō tē haqiqat omniya (Tsitseron)^[405]

"Siz hamma narsani qilishingizga aminman"

Mukammal passiv infinitivda bo'lgani kabi, esse ko'pincha chiqarib tashlanadi:

locum ubī esset facile ixtiro qilish (Nepos)^[406]

"ular qaerdaligini osongina topishlari mumkin edi (u aytdi)"

Kelajakdagi passiv bilan fe'lning supinidan foydalangan holda qilingan īrī nisbatan kam uchraydi:^[407]

rūmor venit datum īrī gladiatorlar (Terens)^[408]

"gladiatorlar shousi namoyish etilishi haqida mish-mish tarqaldi"

Fe'l possum "Men qodirman" kelgusi infinitivga ega emas, lekin kelajakdagi ma'noga ega bo'lishi mumkin:^[409]

totīus Galliae sēsē potīrī posse jirkanch (Qaysar)^[410]

"ular butun Galliya ustidan nazoratni qo'lga kiritamiz deb umid qilishadi"

Old ut

Kelajakni bilvosita bayonotda ifodalashning yana bir usuli bu iborani ishlatishdir oldingi ut 'it would be the case that'. This can be used with an active or passive verb, and almost always with either the present or the imperfect subjunctive:^[411]

spērō fore ut contingat id nōbīs (Tsitseron)^[412]

'I hope that we shall have that good fortune'

respondērunt Chaldaeī fore ut imperāret mātremque occīderet (Tatsitus)^[413]

'the astrologers replied that (Nero) would become Emperor, and that he would kill his mother'

omnēs id oldingi putābant ut miser virgīs caederētur (Tsitseron)^[414]

'they all thought that the poor man was going to be beaten with rods'

Ba'zan futūrum esse ut o'rniga ishlatiladi fore ut:

futūrum esse, nisī prōvisum esset, ut Rima caperētur (Tsitseron)^[415]

'(the voice predicted) that unless precautions were taken, Rome would be captured'

Juda kam fore ut can be followed by a perfect or pluperfect subjunctive.^[416] In the following example, the pluperfect subjunctive represents a future perfect indicative of direct speech:

spērābam, cum hās litterās accēpissēs, fore ut ea quae superiōribus litterīs ā tē petīssēmus impetrāta essent (Cicero to Plancus)^[417]

'I hope (epistolary imperfect) that by the time you receive this letter, what I requested from you in my earlier letter will have been granted'

Kelajak mukammal infinitiv

To express a future perfect tense in indirect statement is possible only if the verb is passive or deponent.^[418] In the following examples, a perfect participle is combined with the future infinitive oldingi:

Carthāginiēsēs dēbellātum mox oldingi rēbantur (Livi)^[419]

'the Carthaginians thought that the war was soon going to have been brought to an end'

metum sī quī sustulisset, omnem vītae dīligentiam sublātam fore (Tsitseron)^[420]

'if someone were to remove fear, all carefulness of life would be removed too'

hoc possum dīcere, mē satis adeptum fore, sī nūllum in mē perīculum redundārit (Tsitseron)^[421]

'I can say this, that I will have achieved enough, if no danger redounds on me'

Perifrastik mukammal infinitiv

The periphrastic perfect infinitive represents a potential pluperfect subjunctive ('would have done') in indirect statement:^[422]

hoc tamen nūntiā, melius mē moritūram fuisse sī nōn in fūnere meō nūpsissem (Livi)^[423]

'but take this message to him, that I would have died better if I had not married on the day of my funeral!'

dīxit sī egō cōnsul nōn fuissem, rem pūblicam funditus peritūram fuisse (Tsitseron)^[424]

'he said that if I had not been consul, the republic would have been completely finished'

If the introductory verb is passive, such as vidētur 'he seems', the participle is nominative:

nōn vidētur mentītūrus fuisse, nisī dēspērāsset (Quintilian)^[425]

'it is unlikely that he would have told a lie unless he had been desperate'

The same tense of the infinitive can also represent the transformation into indirect statement of an imperfect potential subjunctive, referring to a hypothetical present situation:^[426]

an tū cēnsēs ūllam anum tam dēlīram futūram fuisse ut somniīs crēderet, nisī ista cāsū nōn nunquam forte temerē concurrerent? (Tsitseron)^[427]

'do you think any old woman would ever be so crazy as to believe in dreams if they didn't come true by chance sometimes?'

quid putāmus passūrum fuisse sī vīveret? – nobīscum cēnāret! (Pliniy)^[428]

'what do we think would be happening to him if he were alive?' – 'he would be dining with us!'

fatentur sē virtūtis causā, nisi ea voluptātem faceret, nē manum quidem versūrōs fuisse (Tsitseron)^[429]

'they confess that they would not lift a finger for the sake of virtue, unless virtue itself gave pleasure'

quī nec tē cōnsule tuum sapientissimum cōnsilium secūtus esset nec frātre tuō cōnsulātum gerente vōbīs auctōribus ūtī voluerit, nunc omnia tenentem nostrās sententiās dēsīderātūrum cēnsēs xushbichim? (Cicero to Marcellus )^[430]

'do you suppose that the person (i.e. Pompey ) who hadn't followed your very wise advice when you were konsul, nor was willing to consult you and your brother when your brother held the consulship, would now, if he were holding supreme power, be wanting our opinions?'

In all the above examples, the imperfect subjunctive in the subordinate clause is left unchanged, despite the fact that the main verb is primary.

Xuddi shunday fore ut is used to make a future passive infinitive, so futūrum fuisse ut can be used to make a potential passive infinitive:^[431]

nisi eō ipsō tempore quīdam nūntiī dē Caesaris victōriā essent allātī, exīstimābant plērīque futūrum fuisse utī āmitterētur (Qaysar)^[432]

'if at that very moment certain reports had not arrived bringing news of Caesar's victory, most people reckoned that the town would have been lost'

However this is very rare, and in fact only two instances have been noted (the other being Cicero Tusk. 3.69).^[433]

Gerundive infinitives

The gerundive infinitive in indirect speech indicates something which needs to be done at the time of the verb of speaking:

medicō ipsī putō aliquid dandum esse (Tsitseron)^[434]

'I think something should be given to the doctor himself'

The perfect gerundive infinitive indicates something that was necessary at a previous time:

iter Asiāticum tuum putō tibī suscipiendum fuisse (Tsitseron)^[435]

'I imagine that it was unavoidable for you to undertake that journey to Asia'

It can also refer to what ought to have been done at some time in the past:^[436]

quid tandem praetōrī faciendum fuisse? (Livi)^[437]

'what, pray, ought a praetor to have done?'

In a conditional clause in reported speech the perfect gerundive infinitive can also refer to something that would have been necessary in some hypothetical situation:

nec cuīquam ante pereundum fuisse sī Sīlius rērum poterētur (Tatsitus)^[438]

'and (he said that) there wouldn't be anyone who would be forced to die sooner than himself if Silius were Emperor'

The future gerundive infinitive is made with oldingi. It is used in indirect statements to describe something which it is going to be necessary to do:

itaque eō ipsō locō mētārī suōs castra iusserat, laetus in illīs potissimum angustiīs dēcernendum fore (Curtius)^[439]

'and so he had ordered his men to lay out their camp in that very place, delighted that it was going to be necessary to fight the decisive battle in that particular narrow plain '

It can also describe what must necessarily happen at a future time:

senēscendum fore tantum terrārum vel sine proeliō obeuntī (Curtius)^[440]

'(he had written that) a person would inevitably grow old just visiting such a huge country, even without fighting a battle'

Bilvosita nutqdagi zamonlarga umumiy nuqtai

A characteristic of Roman historical writing is that long speeches are reported indirectly (ōrātiō oblīqua). In this practice Roman writers such as Qaysar, Sallust, Livi, Kurtiy va Tatsitus differ from Greek writers such as Fukidid, as well as from Roman poets such as Virgil va Ovid, who write their speeches in direct speech (ōrātiō rēcta).

Uchun qoida ōrātiō oblīqua is that the infinitive is used to represent the main verbs of statements (this also sometimes applies to questions), while all other verbs, that is, those in commands, most questions, and subordinate clauses, are put into the subjunctive mood. The writer may use primary sequence or historic, or sometimes a mixture of the two.^[441] The use of primary tenses in a historic context is known as repraesentātiō.^[442]

In some cases, the use of the subjunctive indicates that the sentence is partly in ōrātiō oblīqua. This is known as virtual ōrātiō oblīqua:^[443]

Aristīdēs nōnne ob eam causam expulsus est patriā, quod praeter modum iūstus esset? (Tsitseron)^[444]

'wasn't Aristides expelled from his country because (people said) he was excessively righteous?'

Subordinate clauses generally change their tenses less than the main clauses in reported speech. In some cases, when the main verb is 1st or 2nd person, the subordinate clause is not put in the subjunctive at all:^[445]

spērō, sī absolūtus eritiladi, coniūnctiōrem illum nōbīs fore in ratiōne petītiōnis (Tsitseron)^[446]

'I hope that if (Catiline) is acquitted, he will work more closely with me in my election campaign'

The following table shows the tenses used in main clauses in indirect questions (subjunctive) and indirect statements (infinitive):

How tenses change when put into indirect speech (main clauses)
Tense of original verb	Subjunktiv (asosiy)	Subjunktiv (tarixiy)	Infinitiv
Hozir, Imperative, Jussive subjunctive	Hozir	Nomukammal	Hozir
Imperfect, Zo'r, Pluperfect	Zo'r	Pluperfect	Zo'r
Kelajak, Potential present subjunktiv	Periphrastic present, (Hozir)	Periphrastic imperf., (Imperfect)	Kelajak, Fore ut + pres/impf subj.
Kelajak mukammaldir	No examples	No examples	Perfect participle + fore, Old ut + perf/pluperf subj.
Potential imperfect subjunktiv	Perfect periphrastic, Nomukammal	Perfect periphrastic, Nomukammal	Perfect periphrastic
Potential pluperfect subjunktiv	Perfect periphrastic, Pluperfect, Potuerit	Perfect periphrastic, (Plupf. periphrastic), Pluperfect, Potuerit	Perfect periphrastic, Futūrum fuisse ut + pres/impf subj.

Ishtirok etish

Compared to Greek, Latin is deficient in participles, having only three, as follows, as well as the gerundive. The Romans themselves^[447] considered the gerundive also to be a participle, but most modern grammars treat it as a separate part of speech.^[448]

The different participles of the verb dūcō are shown below:

Participles and gerundive (3rd conjugation)
	Faol		Passiv
Hozir	dūcēns, pl. dūcentēs	etakchi
Zo'r			kanal, pl. ductī	led, having been led
Kelajak	ductūrus, pl. ductūrī	going to lead
Gerundive			dūcendus, pl. dūcendī	needing to be led

The participles are all verbal adjectives, and so the ending changes according to case, gender, and number.

As the table shows, there is no passive present or future participle, and no active past participle. In deponent verbs, however, the Perfect participle is active in meaning, e.g. profektus, 'having set out', cōnātus 'having tried'. In deponent verbs, the gerundive is usually used in impersonal form and with an active meaning: proficīscendum est 'it is necessary to set out', moriendum est 'it is necessary to die', cōnandum est 'it is necessary to try'; but some deponent verbs have a personal gerundive with a passive sense: hortandus 'needing to be encouraged', sequendus 'needing to be followed':

media ratiō sequenda est (Columella)^[449]

'a middle course must be followed'

Deponent verbs also have active present and future participles, e.g. moriēns 'dying', moritūrus 'about to die'.

Fe'l sum 'I am' has no Present or Perfect participle in classical Latin, but only the Future participle futūrus 'going to be'. The compound verbs praesum va absum, however, form the Present participles praesēns, absēns.

Fe'llar volō "Men xohlayman" va possum 'I am able' have no future participle. Potēns, the present participle of possum, has a limited use as an adjective meaning 'powerful'.

The 3rd and 4th conjugation gerundive in older texts such as Plautus ends with -undus: faciundum, ferundum, veniundum.^[450] Such endings are sometimes found even in classical Latin. Keyinchalik, -endus became usual, but in the verb eō 'I go', the gerundive is always eundum 'necessary to go'.

Like the infinitive, the tenses of the participles are not absolute but relative to the main verb of the sentence. For example, a future participle can refer to an action in the past, provided it is later than the time of the main verb; and similarly the perfect participle can refer to an action in the future, provided it is earlier than the time of the main verb.

Hozirgi zamon kesimi

The present participle usually describes a condition or an action which is happening at the time of the main verb:

aquā ferventī ... perfunditur (Tsitseron)^[451]

'he was doused with qaynoq water'

strictō gladiō ad dormientem Lūcrētiam vēnit (Livi)^[452]

'having drawn his sword, he came to Lucretia while she was sleeping'

Occasionally, a present participle can refer to an action which takes place immediately before the time of the main verb:

quaerentīque virō 'satin salvē?' 'minimē' inquit (Livi)^[453]

'and when her husband asked "are you all right?" "no!" she replied'

Zo'r qism

The perfect participle refers to an action which took place before the time of the main verb, or to the state that something is in as a result of an earlier action:

occīsōs sepelīvit (Evropiy )^[454]

'he buried the o'lik (those who had been killed)'

Kelajak ishtirokchisi

The future participle is most commonly used in the periphrastic tenses or in indirect statements (see examples above). 'An examination of the usage of the various authors shows that the form in -ūrus did not reach the full status of a participle till the time of Livy. Up to the time of Caesar and Cicero its use was almost restricted to a combination with the verb esse, making a periphrastic future tense (Woodcock).^[455] Woodcock speculates that the -ūrus ending might originally have been a verbal noun. In later authors the future participle is sometimes used as in Greek to indicate purpose:

dēdūcit quadrirēmēs, lātūrus yordamchi (Pliniy)^[456]

'he launched some warships, with a view to bringing help'

Bibliografiya

Andrewes, M. (1937). "Caesar's Use of Tense Sequence in Indirect Speech". Klassik obzor, Jild 51, No. 4 (Sep., 1937), pp. 114–116.
Andrewes, M. (1951). "The Function of Tense Variation in the Subjunctive Mood of Oratio Obliqua". Klassik obzor, Yangi seriyalar, jild 1, No. 3/4 (Dec., 1951), pp. 142–146.
De Melo, Wolfgang (2007). "Latin prohibitions and the Origins of the u/w-Perfect and the Type amāstī". Glotta, Bd. 83 (2007), pp. 43–68.
Gildersleeve, B. L. & Gonzalez Lodge (1895). Gilderslivning lotin grammatikasi. 3-nashr. (Makmillan)
Goodrich, W. J. "On the Prospective Use of the Latin Imperfect Subjunctive in Relative Clauses". Klassik obzor, Jild 31, No. 3/4 (May - Jun., 1917), pp. 83–86.
Greenough, J. B. et al. (1903). Allen and Greenough's New Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges. Boston va London.
Haverling, Gerd V.M. (2012). "Actionality, tense, and viewpoint". Yilda Baldi, Filipp; Cuzzolin, Pierluigi (eds.) (2012). Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, Adverbs, Mood, Tense. ISBN 978-3110205633, pp. 277–524.
Kennedy, Benjamin Hall (1871). Qayta ko'rib chiqilgan Lotin tili. Edited and further revised by Sir James Mountford, Longman 1930; reprinted 1962.
Ker, James (2007). "Roman Repraesentatio". Amerika filologiya jurnali, Jild 128, No. 3 (Autumn, 2007), pp. 341–365.
Pinkster, Harm (1990), Latin Syntax and Semantics.
Postgate, J. P. (1905). "Repraesentatio Temporum in the Oratio Obliqua of Caesar". Klassik obzor, Jild 19, No. 9 (Dec., 1905), pp. 441–446.
Powell, J. G. F. (2005). "Cicero's adaptation of legal Latin in the de Legibus". In Reinhardt, T. et al. (tahrir). Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose. ISBN 9780197263327
Salmon, E. T. (1931). "A Note on Subordinate Clauses in Oratio Obliqua". Klassik obzor, Jild 45, No. 5 (Nov., 1931), p. 173.
Terrell, Glanville (1904). "The Apodosis of the Unreal Condition in Oratio Obliqua in Latin". Amerika filologiya jurnali, Jild 25, No. 1 (1904), pp. 59–73.
Viti, Carlotta (2010). "The non-literal use of tenses in Latin, with particular reference to the praesens historicum". Revue de linguistique latine du Centre Alfred Ernout. (Posted at Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich).
Wheeler, Arthur Leslie, (1903). "The Imperfect Indicative in Early Latin". Amerika filologiya jurnali, Jild 24, No. 2 (1903), pp. 163–191.
Wigtil, David N. (1992) "Translating Latin Tenses into English". Klassik dunyo, Jild 85, No. 6 (Jul. - Aug., 1992), pp. 675–686.
Woodcock, E.C. (1959), Lotin tilidagi yangi sintaksis.

Adabiyotlar

^ Kennedy (1962), p. 56; Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 64; Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 72.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 88.
^ qarz Wigtil (1992).
^ See Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 154-167.
^ Haverling (2012), p. 340.
^ C.J. Fordyce (1961), Katullus, note on Catullus 5.10.
^ Wackernagel (2009) Lectures on Syntax, p. 305, note 7.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 166.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 1.1.
^ CIcero, mushukda. 1.2.
^ Tsitseron Academica Pos. 2.
^ CIcero Fam. 6.5.1.
^ Pinkster (1990), p. 224.
^ Catullus, 5.1.
^ Tsitseron, pro Flacco 39.
^ Caesar, B.C. 6.38.
^ Pinkster (1990), p. 224.
^ Pinkster (1990), p. 240.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 6.37.6.
^ Ovid, Uchrashdi 4.55
^ Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens (2006), Latin Word Order. Structured Meaning and Information. Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti, p. 159.
^ See Viti (2010).
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 157, 159.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.4.38.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.2.23.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 176.
^ Terens, Eun. 84.
^ Martial 6.21.7.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 2.11.1.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 372.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 15.14.1.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 168.
^ Nepos, Xann. 5.4.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 156.
^ Tsitseron, e'lon Att. 5.6.2.
^ Kato, de Rē Rūsticā 156.
^ Tsitseron, e'lon Att. 14.20.5.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 16.6.4.
^ Wheeler (1903), pp. 177–9.
^ Bellum Aleksandrinum 36.
^ Livy, 45.12.
^ Livy, 1.12.9.
^ Livy, 32.32.1.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.162.
^ Aulus Gellius 10.3.12; qarz Ker (2007), p. 345.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 1.6.1.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 158; Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 329.
^ Tatsitus, Ann. 2.34
^ Tatsitus, Ann. 16.33.
^ Tatsitus, Tarix. 2.66.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 174.
^ Livy, 1.27.11.
^ Sallust, Jugurta 25.6.
^ Livy, 24.29
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 166-7.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 1.10 (6)
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 386.
^ Quintilian 2.8.8.
^ Pliniy, Ep. 4.13.4.
^ Suetonius, Vita divi Iulii 37.
^ Tsitseron, reklama Fam. 4.12.1.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 4.25.5.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 159.
^ Tsitseron, Fam, 16.9.3.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 12.27.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 14.18.1.
^ Tsitseron, Notiq 50.168.
^ Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 299.
^ Horace, Ep. 1.2.47
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 363; Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 332.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. Disp. 1.24.
^ Tsitseron, dē Ōrāt. 2.24.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 158.
^ Tsitseron, Lucullus 16.
^ Seneka Ep. 83.12.
^ Tsitseron, Post Reditum in Senātū 17.
^ Cited by Pinkster (1990), p. 216.
^ Liv. 32.35.2
^ Tsitseron, de Oratore 1.191.
^ Livy 7.10.1
^ Livy 35.9.1.
^ Tsitseron, Mushuk 1.9.
^ Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 299.
^ Petronius, Satirikon 75.
^ Livy, 1.36.5
^ Virgil, Eneyid 2.325.
^ Pinkster (1990), p. 238, §11.3.1.
^ Terens, Eun. 107
^ Qaysar B.G. 1.2.1
^ Pinkster (1990), p. 239, §11.3.1.
^ Pinkster (1990), p. 223, §11.1.3.
^ Tsitseron, Planc. 84.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 2.5.6.
^ Livy 26.27, 24.7.
^ Nepos, Konon 1.2; Alkibiyadalar 1.2.
^ Tsitseron, Fin. 2.55
^ Catullus 30.11.
^ Catullus 85.
^ Tsitseron, Div. Caec. 20.
^ Conlocūtu's = conlocūtus es.
^ Plautus, Pseud. 618.
^ Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 300.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 4.29.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 15.20.4.
^ Tsitseron, ad Brut. 1.1.1.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 160.
^ Haverling (2012), p. 373.
^ Greg. Tur. Vit. Patr. 3.1.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 9.12.3.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 161 note 2.
^ dē Bellō Hispāniēnsī 7.3.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 1.15.1.
^ [Caesar] Bellum Aleksandrinum 10.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 165–6.
^ Gellius 13.19.2
^ Tsitseron, Rosc.Com. 1.3.
^ Tsitseron, Div. 1.34.74.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. 4.15.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 79.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 80.
^ Livy 1.56.11.
^ Plautus, Poenulus 39.
^ Plautus, Most. 484.
^ Tsitseron, e'lon Att. 5.1.3.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 4.25.3.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 163.
^ Livy, 1.58.10.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 373; 380-381
^ Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 300.
^ Livy 1.58.3.
^ Catullus 5.10. For the length of the ī, see Fordyce's note.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 5.21.5.
^ Tsitseron, dē Ōr. 2.261.
^ Plautus, Curculio 491.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 9.12.2.
^ Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.80.1.
^ Curtius, 8.1.50.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 363.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.27.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.27.
^ Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 333.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 386.
^ Florus, 2.13.19.
^ Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.47.5.
^ Tsitseron, Fam, 7.2.3.
^ Tsitseron, Cael. 10
^ Tsitseron, Ver. 2.5.7.
^ Tsitseron, Att, 3.3.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 385; Woodcock (1959), pp. 154–5.
^ Tsitseron, Mushuk 1.19.
^ Tsitseron, Div. 2.45.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 153.
^ Plautus, Men. 640.
^ R.D. Williams on Eneyid 6.292–4. Boshqa misollar Eneyid are 2.599f, 5.325f, 12.733.
^ Virgil, Eneyid 6.292-4.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 151; Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 381.
^ Cato apud Gell. 11.2.6.
^ Seneca, Ep. 12.4.
^ Plautus, Trin. 671.
^ Catullus, 5.1.
^ Gellius, Noctēs Atticae 2.2.6.
^ Tsitseron, O'chirilgan. 3.54.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.4.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 174; Woodcock (1959), pp. 129–130.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 9.5.2.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 10.8.7, and often.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 345.
^ ad Herr. 4.28.39.
^ Catullus 85.
^ Livy, 1.58.5
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 136
^ Qaysar, B.G. 1.31.15.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 237.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 1.44.11.
^ Tsitseron, dē Fīn. 3.1.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 88.
^ Plautus, Asinarius 654.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 14.3.3.
^ De Melo (2007)
^ Plautus, Mostellaria 524.
^ Plautus, Poenulus 1089.
^ Livi, Praefātiō 1.
^ Terens, Evnuxus 346.
^ Virgil, Eneyid, 10.105
^ Plautus, Stichus 593.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 154.
^ Tsitseron, Fil. 8.22.
^ Tsitseron, in Caec. 19.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 6.1.11.
^ Plautus, Pseud. 640.
^ Seneca, Ep. 99.2.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 15.4.4.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 91.
^ Livy, 2.43.9.
^ Williams, R.D. (1973). Virgilning Eneyidi books 7–12, on book 8.643.
^ Virgil, Eneyid 8.643.
^ See examples in Woodcock (1959), p. 86.
^ Virgil, Ek. 1.40; 7.10.
^ Nepos, Gannibal, 12.4.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.4.32.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 319.
^ Nepos, Alkibiyadalar 3.2.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 296.
^ Tsitseron, Fīn. 2.30.
^ Curtius 3.8.14.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 136.
^ Tsitseron, Qizil. Pop. 14.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 321.
^ Nepos, Xann. 9.1.
^ Goodrich (1917)
^ Tsitseron, Fil. 3.11.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 239.
^ Livy, 9.29.4.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 166.
^ Lyuis va Qisqa, Lotin lug'ati, s.v. sum.
^ Livy, 3.22.9.
^ Livy, 2.51.2.
^ Livy, 1.26.1.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. Disp. 3.38.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 7.21.2.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 10.14.3.
^ Sallust, Cat/ 22.
^ Livy, 10.20.10.
^ Gellius, 13.5.4.
^ Tsitseron, dē Dīv. 1.42, quoting from an unknown poet.
^ Livy 2.32.1.
^ Gellius, 17.9.6.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 5.48.4.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 1.17.9.
^ Ovid, Uchrashdi 6.678.
^ Terens, Hec. 526.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 88.
^ Tsitseron, Rep. 4.8.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 90.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.4.94.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 383.
^ Plautus, Kas. 424.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 154.
^ Livy 26.49.3.
^ Woodcock (1959), pp. 90–91.
^ Tsitseron, O'chirilgan. 1.75.
^ Livy, 21.38.7.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. 1.98.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 315; Woodcock (1959), pp. 136, 224, 226; Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 304.
^ Nepos, Timoth. 4.2.
^ Tsitseron, Fil. 7.26.
^ Seneca, Controv. 2.4.1.
^ Att. 10.3A.2
^ Plautus, Cist. 101.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 12.38.1.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.140.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.27.
^ Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 345.
^ Att 10.10.1
^ Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 345.
^ Tsitseron, Brutus 65.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 154.
^ Plautus, Trin. 927.
^ Livy, 2.40.8.
^ Tsitseron, In Cat. 2.4.
^ Williams, R.D. (1972), Virgilning Eneyidi note on 4.604–6.
^ Virgil, Aen. 4.604–5.
^ See Sonnenschein (1911), p. 244; qarz also Aeneid 10.850, 11.162.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 87.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 3.195.
^ Tatsitus, Tarix. 1.49.
^ Tsitseron, de Off. 3.112.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 136.
^ Tsitseron, Mushuk 2.13.
^ Woodcock (1959), pp. 224, 225.
^ Livy 42.33.3.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 8.11.2.
^ Catullus 5.
^ Livy 1.58.7
^ Tsitseron, Mushuk 1.10
^ Terens, Hec. 793
^ Seneca the Elder, Controv. 7.7.2
^ Virgil, Aen. 12.875
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 173.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 4.17.4.
^ Gerd V.M. Haverling, in Baldi & Cuzzolin (eds), p. 400.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 174.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 10.1.3
^ Plautus, Mercātor 770.
^ Terens, Evnuxus, 592.
^ Kato, de Agri Cultura 156.
^ Martial, 2.28.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 174.
^ Tsitseron, Oyoq. 3.8.
^ Powell (2005), p. 137.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 166.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 163.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 8.7.2.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 15.20.4.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 12.34.2.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 4.12.1.
^ Ovid, Uchrashdi 3.200.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 386.
^ Ovid, Trist. 1.7.40.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 164.
^ Seneca, Ep. 71.11.
^ Curtius 7.1.39.
^ Livy 10.11.4.
^ Woodcock (1959), pp. 228–229.
^ Tsitseron Fam. 3.6.5.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 7.16.3.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 418; Woodcock (1959), p. 237.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. 2.51.
^ Tsitseron Att. 15.9.2.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 164.
^ Sallust, Jugurta 109.2.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 139.
^ Livy 9.33.7.
^ Tsitseron, Lig 34.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 139.
^ Seneca, Ep. 32.2.
^ Tsitseron, Fil. 3.24.
^ Ovid, Qahramonlar 17.91.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 139.
^ Livy, 10.45.3.
^ Pliniy, Ep. 3.15.2.
^ Celsus, de Medicina 6.10.3.
^ Seneca, Constant. 2.7.2.
^ Tsitseron, dē Domō Suā 2.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 163.
^ Tsitseron, Mur. 18.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 13.9.2.
^ Celsus, Med. 6.7.3a.
^ Tsitseron, pro Fonteio 36.
^ Tsitseron, Mil. 66
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 156.
^ Livy 2.38.5.
^ Tsitseron, Fil. 11.20.
^ Vitruvius, Arxitektura 2.7.5.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 315.
^ Tsitseron, Clu. 72
^ Tsitseron, Att. 15.4.4.
^ Livy, 9.33.7.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 8.12B.1.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.107
^ Tsitseron, Att. 15.4.4.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 7.15.2.
^ Postgate (1905), p. 443.
^ Sallust, Mushuk 27.2.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 107; Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 317.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 12.27.
^ Plautus Amph. 195.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 102.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 317.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. Disp. 1.14.
^ Plautus, Trin. 591.
^ Postgate (1905), p. 443.
^ Livy 1.58.5.
^ Livy 9.4.2.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 317.
^ Tsitseron, Beshinchi. 5.18.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 317.
^ Tsitseron, Fil. 2.61.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 318.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 1.4.12.
^ Livy, 9.33.7.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 387.
^ Livy, 4.38.5.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge, (1895), p. 387; Woodcock (1959), pp. 139–40.
^ Livy, 4.38.5.
^ Andrewes (1951), p. 143.
^ Andrewes (1951), p. 143.
^ Sallust, Mushuk 34; contrast Caesar, B.G. 1.7.5.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334 note 1; Woodcock (1959), p. 22.
^ Livy 2.6.8.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334, note 3.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 14.23.
^ Tsitseron, Mil. 31.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 331, note 3.
^ Seneca, dē Cōnsōlātiōne 11.16.1.
^ Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.58.5.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 9.6A.1.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 15.
^ Sallust, Ko'za. 101.11.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.17.
^ Tsitseron, Amīc. 73.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 3.15.8.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 386; Woodcock (1959), p. 139.
^ Juvenal, 10.123.
^ Tsitseron, Planc. 60.
^ Tsitseron, Dom. 5.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 6.13.1.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 180.
^ Tsitseron, Mushuk 1.2.5.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1959), p. 333.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 181.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 21.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334.
^ Tsitseron, O'chirilgan. 1.30.108.
^ Nepos, Xann. 12.5.
^ Lyuis va Qisqa, Lotin lug'ati, s.v. meminī.
^ Seneca the Elder, Controversiae 3.7.16.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 102.
^ Eutropius, 2.11.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.1.80.
^ Bellum Alexandrīnum 10.
^ Tsitseron Fam. 4.12.2.
^ Livy, 1.58.5.
^ Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.105.1.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 5.5.3.
^ Nepos, Xann. 12.3.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 113.
^ Terens, Hecyra 38.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 113.
^ Qaysar, B.G. 1.3.7.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 165, 334.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. 1.34.
^ Tatsitus, Ann. 14.9.
^ Tsitseron, Verr. 2.4.86.
^ Tsitseron, Div. 1.101.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 165.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 16.16E.2.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 22; Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334, note 1.
^ 23.13.6; qarz Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. 4.46.
^ Tsitseron, Xira. 27.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 235.
^ Livi, 30.15.
^ Tsitseron, Post Reditum 17.
^ Kintilian, 5.12.3.
^ Terrell (1904) ko'plab misollarni to'playdi. Cf. shuningdek Woodcock (1959), 236-7 betlar; Allen va Greenough (1903), 383-4 bet.
^ Tsitseron, dēv. 2.141.
^ Pliniy, Ep. 4.22.6.
^ Tsitseron, Fīn. 5.31.93.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 4.9.1.
^ Allen va Greenough (1903), p. 383.
^ Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.101.3.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 236.
^ Tsitseron, Fam. 16.4.2.
^ Tsitseron, Att. 4.15.2.
^ Allen va Greenough (1903), p. 381.
^ Livi 31.48.
^ Tatsitus, Ann. 11.36.
^ Kursiy, 3.8.20.
^ Kursiy 4.5.6.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), 416-7 betlar.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 238; Pochta eshigi (1905); Ker (2007).
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 340; Woodcock (1959), p. 238.
^ Tsitseron, Tusk. Tashlab ketish. 5.105.
^ Salmon (1931).
^ Tsitseron, Att. 1.2.1.
^ Donatus Ars Minor: de ishtirok etish; Kintilian 9.3.9.
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 71.
^ Kolumella, 9.16.4.
^ Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 89.
^ Tsitseron, Ver. 2.1.67
^ Livi, 1.58.2.
^ Livi, 1.58.7.
^ Evtropiy, 2.11
^ Woodcock (1959), p. 82.
^ Pliniy, Ep. 6.16.9.

Tashqi havolalar

Chikago Persey universiteti PhiloLogic qidiruv korpusi ostida. Perseus PhiloLogic bosh sahifasida
Allen & Greenough lotin grammatikasining onlayn versiyasi
Gildersleeve & Lodge lotin grammatikasining onlayn versiyasi

[1] Kennedy (1962), p. 56; Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 64; Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 72.

[2] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 88.

[3] qarz Wigtil (1992).

[4] See Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 154-167.

[5] Haverling (2012), p. 340.

[6] C.J. Fordyce (1961), Katullus, note on Catullus 5.10.

[7] Wackernagel (2009) Lectures on Syntax, p. 305, note 7.

[8] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 166.

[9] Qaysar, B.G. 1.1.

[10] CIcero, mushukda. 1.2.

[11] Tsitseron Academica Pos. 2.

[12] CIcero Fam. 6.5.1.

[13] Pinkster (1990), p. 224.

[14] Catullus, 5.1.

[15] Tsitseron, pro Flacco 39.

[16] Caesar, B.C. 6.38.

[17] Pinkster (1990), p. 224.

[18] Pinkster (1990), p. 240.

[19] Qaysar, B.G. 6.37.6.

[20] Ovid, Uchrashdi 4.55

[21] Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens (2006), Latin Word Order. Structured Meaning and Information. Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti, p. 159.

[22] See Viti (2010).

[23] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 157, 159.

[24] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.4.38.

[25] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.2.23.

[26] Woodcock (1959), p. 176.

[27] Terens, Eun. 84.

[28] Martial 6.21.7.

[29] Tsitseron, Att. 2.11.1.

[30] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 372.

[31] Tsitseron, Fam. 15.14.1.

[32] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 168.

[33] Nepos, Xann. 5.4.

[34] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 156.

[35] Tsitseron, e'lon Att. 5.6.2.

[36] Kato, de Rē Rūsticā 156.

[37] Tsitseron, e'lon Att. 14.20.5.

[38] Tsitseron, Att. 16.6.4.

[39] Wheeler (1903), pp. 177–9.

[40] Bellum Aleksandrinum 36.

[41] Livy, 45.12.

[42] Livy, 1.12.9.

[43] Livy, 32.32.1.

[44] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.162.

[45] Aulus Gellius 10.3.12; qarz Ker (2007), p. 345.

[46] Qaysar, B.G. 1.6.1.

[47] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 158; Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 329.

[48] Tatsitus, Ann. 2.34

[49] Tatsitus, Ann. 16.33.

[50] Tatsitus, Tarix. 2.66.

[51] Woodcock (1959), p. 174.

[52] Livy, 1.27.11.

[53] Sallust, Jugurta 25.6.

[54] Livy, 24.29

[55] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 166-7.

[56] Tsitseron, Att. 1.10 (6)

[57] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 386.

[58] Quintilian 2.8.8.

[59] Pliniy, Ep. 4.13.4.

[60] Suetonius, Vita divi Iulii 37.

[61] Tsitseron, reklama Fam. 4.12.1.

[62] Qaysar, B.G. 4.25.5.

[63] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 159.

[64] Tsitseron, Fam, 16.9.3.

[65] Tsitseron, Fam. 12.27.

[66] Tsitseron, Att. 14.18.1.

[67] Tsitseron, Notiq 50.168.

[68] Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 299.

[69] Horace, Ep. 1.2.47

[70] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 363; Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 332.

[71] Tsitseron, Tusk. Disp. 1.24.

[72] Tsitseron, dē Ōrāt. 2.24.

[73] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 158.

[74] Tsitseron, Lucullus 16.

[75] Seneka Ep. 83.12.

[76] Tsitseron, Post Reditum in Senātū 17.

[77] Cited by Pinkster (1990), p. 216.

[78] Liv. 32.35.2

[79] Tsitseron, de Oratore 1.191.

[80] Livy 7.10.1

[81] Livy 35.9.1.

[82] Tsitseron, Mushuk 1.9.

[83] Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 299.

[84] Petronius, Satirikon 75.

[85] Livy, 1.36.5

[86] Virgil, Eneyid 2.325.

[87] Pinkster (1990), p. 238, §11.3.1.

[88] Terens, Eun. 107

[89] Qaysar B.G. 1.2.1

[90] Pinkster (1990), p. 239, §11.3.1.

[91] Pinkster (1990), p. 223, §11.1.3.

[92] Tsitseron, Planc. 84.

[93] Qaysar, B.G. 2.5.6.

[94] Livy 26.27, 24.7.

[95] Nepos, Konon 1.2; Alkibiyadalar 1.2.

[96] Tsitseron, Fin. 2.55

[97] Catullus 30.11.

[98] Catullus 85.

[99] Tsitseron, Div. Caec. 20.

[100] Conlocūtu's = conlocūtus es.

[101] Plautus, Pseud. 618.

[102] Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 300.

[103] Qaysar, B.G. 4.29.

[104] Tsitseron, Att. 15.20.4.

[105] Tsitseron, ad Brut. 1.1.1.

[106] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 160.

[107] Haverling (2012), p. 373.

[108] Greg. Tur. Vit. Patr. 3.1.

[109] Tsitseron, Att. 9.12.3.

[110] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 161 note 2.

[111] dē Bellō Hispāniēnsī 7.3.

[112] Qaysar, B.G. 1.15.1.

[113] [Caesar] Bellum Aleksandrinum 10.

[114] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 165–6.

[115] Gellius 13.19.2

[116] Tsitseron, Rosc.Com. 1.3.

[117] Tsitseron, Div. 1.34.74.

[118] Tsitseron, Tusk. 4.15.

[119] Woodcock (1959), p. 79.

[120] Woodcock (1959), p. 80.

[121] Livy 1.56.11.

[122] Plautus, Poenulus 39.

[123] Plautus, Most. 484.

[124] Tsitseron, e'lon Att. 5.1.3.

[125] Qaysar, B.G. 4.25.3.

[126] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 163.

[127] Livy, 1.58.10.

[128] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 373; 380-381

[129] Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 300.

[130] Livy 1.58.3.

[131] Catullus 5.10. For the length of the ī, see Fordyce's note.

[132] Tsitseron, Fam. 5.21.5.

[133] Tsitseron, dē Ōr. 2.261.

[134] Plautus, Curculio 491.

[135] Tsitseron, Att. 9.12.2.

[136] Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.80.1.

[137] Curtius, 8.1.50.

[138] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 363.

[139] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.27.

[140] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.27.

[141] Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 333.

[142] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 386.

[143] Florus, 2.13.19.

[144] Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.47.5.

[145] Tsitseron, Fam, 7.2.3.

[146] Tsitseron, Cael. 10

[147] Tsitseron, Ver. 2.5.7.

[148] Tsitseron, Att, 3.3.

[149] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 385; Woodcock (1959), pp. 154–5.

[150] Tsitseron, Mushuk 1.19.

[151] Tsitseron, Div. 2.45.

[152] Woodcock (1959), p. 153.

[153] Plautus, Men. 640.

[154] R.D. Williams on Eneyid 6.292–4. Boshqa misollar Eneyid are 2.599f, 5.325f, 12.733.

[155] Virgil, Eneyid 6.292-4.

[156] Woodcock (1959), p. 151; Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 381.

[157] Cato apud Gell. 11.2.6.

[158] Seneca, Ep. 12.4.

[159] Plautus, Trin. 671.

[160] Catullus, 5.1.

[161] Gellius, Noctēs Atticae 2.2.6.

[162] Tsitseron, O'chirilgan. 3.54.

[163] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.4.

[164] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 174; Woodcock (1959), pp. 129–130.

[165] Tsitseron, Att. 9.5.2.

[166] Tsitseron, Att. 10.8.7, and often.

[167] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 345.

[168] ad Herr. 4.28.39.

[169] Catullus 85.

[170] Livy, 1.58.5

[171] Woodcock (1959), p. 136

[172] Qaysar, B.G. 1.31.15.

[173] Woodcock (1959), p. 237.

[174] Qaysar, B.G. 1.44.11.

[175] Tsitseron, dē Fīn. 3.1.

[176] Woodcock (1959), p. 88.

[177] Plautus, Asinarius 654.

[178] Tsitseron, Fam. 14.3.3.

[179] De Melo (2007)

[180] Plautus, Mostellaria 524.

[181] Plautus, Poenulus 1089.

[182] Livi, Praefātiō 1.

[183] Terens, Evnuxus 346.

[184] Virgil, Eneyid, 10.105

[185] Plautus, Stichus 593.

[186] Woodcock (1959), p. 154.

[187] Tsitseron, Fil. 8.22.

[188] Tsitseron, in Caec. 19.

[189] Tsitseron, Att. 6.1.11.

[190] Plautus, Pseud. 640.

[191] Seneca, Ep. 99.2.

[192] Tsitseron, Att. 15.4.4.

[193] Woodcock (1959), p. 91.

[194] Livy, 2.43.9.

[195] Williams, R.D. (1973). Virgilning Eneyidi books 7–12, on book 8.643.

[196] Virgil, Eneyid 8.643.

[197] See examples in Woodcock (1959), p. 86.

[198] Virgil, Ek. 1.40; 7.10.

[199] Nepos, Gannibal, 12.4.

[200] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.4.32.

[201] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 319.

[202] Nepos, Alkibiyadalar 3.2.

[203] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 296.

[204] Tsitseron, Fīn. 2.30.

[205] Curtius 3.8.14.

[206] Woodcock (1959), p. 136.

[207] Tsitseron, Qizil. Pop. 14.

[208] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 321.

[209] Nepos, Xann. 9.1.

[210] Goodrich (1917)

[211] Tsitseron, Fil. 3.11.

[212] Woodcock (1959), p. 239.

[213] Livy, 9.29.4.

[214] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 166.

[215] Lyuis va Qisqa, Lotin lug'ati, s.v. sum.

[216] Livy, 3.22.9.

[217] Livy, 2.51.2.

[218] Livy, 1.26.1.

[219] Tsitseron, Tusk. Disp. 3.38.

[220] Tsitseron, Att. 7.21.2.

[221] Tsitseron, Att. 10.14.3.

[222] Sallust, Cat/ 22.

[223] Livy, 10.20.10.

[224] Gellius, 13.5.4.

[225] Tsitseron, dē Dīv. 1.42, quoting from an unknown poet.

[226] Livy 2.32.1.

[227] Gellius, 17.9.6.

[228] Qaysar, B.G. 5.48.4.

[229] Tsitseron, Att. 1.17.9.

[230] Ovid, Uchrashdi 6.678.

[231] Terens, Hec. 526.

[232] Woodcock (1959), p. 88.

[233] Tsitseron, Rep. 4.8.

[234] Woodcock (1959), p. 90.

[235] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.4.94.

[236] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 383.

[237] Plautus, Kas. 424.

[238] Woodcock (1959), p. 154.

[239] Livy 26.49.3.

[240] Woodcock (1959), pp. 90–91.

[241] Tsitseron, O'chirilgan. 1.75.

[242] Livy, 21.38.7.

[243] Tsitseron, Tusk. 1.98.

[244] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 315; Woodcock (1959), pp. 136, 224, 226; Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 304.

[245] Nepos, Timoth. 4.2.

[246] Tsitseron, Fil. 7.26.

[247] Seneca, Controv. 2.4.1.

[248] Att. 10.3A.2

[249] Plautus, Cist. 101.

[250] Tsitseron, Att. 12.38.1.

[251] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.140.

[252] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.27.

[253] Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 345.

[254] Att 10.10.1

[255] Allen & Greenough (1903), p. 345.

[256] Tsitseron, Brutus 65.

[257] Woodcock (1959), p. 154.

[258] Plautus, Trin. 927.

[259] Livy, 2.40.8.

[260] Tsitseron, In Cat. 2.4.

[261] Williams, R.D. (1972), Virgilning Eneyidi note on 4.604–6.

[262] Virgil, Aen. 4.604–5.

[263] See Sonnenschein (1911), p. 244; qarz also Aeneid 10.850, 11.162.

[264] Woodcock (1959), p. 87.

[265] Tsitseron, Verr. 3.195.

[266] Tatsitus, Tarix. 1.49.

[267] Tsitseron, de Off. 3.112.

[268] Woodcock (1959), p. 136.

[269] Tsitseron, Mushuk 2.13.

[270] Woodcock (1959), pp. 224, 225.

[271] Livy 42.33.3.

[272] Tsitseron, Fam. 8.11.2.

[273] Catullus 5.

[274] Livy 1.58.7

[275] Tsitseron, Mushuk 1.10

[276] Terens, Hec. 793

[277] Seneca the Elder, Controv. 7.7.2

[278] Virgil, Aen. 12.875

[279] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 173.

[280] Tsitseron, Att. 4.17.4.

[281] Gerd V.M. Haverling, in Baldi & Cuzzolin (eds), p. 400.

[282] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 174.

[283] Tsitseron, Att. 10.1.3

[284] Plautus, Mercātor 770.

[285] Terens, Evnuxus, 592.

[286] Kato, de Agri Cultura 156.

[287] Martial, 2.28.

[288] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 174.

[289] Tsitseron, Oyoq. 3.8.

[290] Powell (2005), p. 137.

[291] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 166.

[292] Woodcock (1959), p. 163.

[293] Tsitseron, Fam. 8.7.2.

[294] Tsitseron, Att. 15.20.4.

[295] Tsitseron, Att. 12.34.2.

[296] Tsitseron, Fam. 4.12.1.

[297] Ovid, Uchrashdi 3.200.

[298] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 386.

[299] Ovid, Trist. 1.7.40.

[300] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 164.

[301] Seneca, Ep. 71.11.

[302] Curtius 7.1.39.

[303] Livy 10.11.4.

[304] Woodcock (1959), pp. 228–229.

[305] Tsitseron Fam. 3.6.5.

[306] Tsitseron, Fam. 7.16.3.

[307] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 418; Woodcock (1959), p. 237.

[308] Tsitseron, Tusk. 2.51.

[309] Tsitseron Att. 15.9.2.

[310] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 164.

[311] Sallust, Jugurta 109.2.

[312] Woodcock (1959), p. 139.

[313] Livy 9.33.7.

[314] Tsitseron, Lig 34.

[315] Woodcock (1959), p. 139.

[316] Seneca, Ep. 32.2.

[317] Tsitseron, Fil. 3.24.

[318] Ovid, Qahramonlar 17.91.

[319] Woodcock (1959), p. 139.

[320] Livy, 10.45.3.

[321] Pliniy, Ep. 3.15.2.

[322] Celsus, de Medicina 6.10.3.

[323] Seneca, Constant. 2.7.2.

[324] Tsitseron, dē Domō Suā 2.

[325] Woodcock (1959), p. 163.

[326] Tsitseron, Mur. 18.

[327] Tsitseron, Att. 13.9.2.

[328] Celsus, Med. 6.7.3a.

[329] Tsitseron, pro Fonteio 36.

[330] Tsitseron, Mil. 66

[331] Woodcock (1959), p. 156.

[332] Livy 2.38.5.

[333] Tsitseron, Fil. 11.20.

[334] Vitruvius, Arxitektura 2.7.5.

[335] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 315.

[336] Tsitseron, Clu. 72

[337] Tsitseron, Att. 15.4.4.

[338] Livy, 9.33.7.

[339] Tsitseron, Att. 8.12B.1.

[340] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.107

[341] Tsitseron, Att. 15.4.4.

[342] Tsitseron, Att. 7.15.2.

[343] Postgate (1905), p. 443.

[344] Sallust, Mushuk 27.2.

[345] Woodcock (1959), p. 107; Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 317.

[346] Tsitseron, Fam. 12.27.

[347] Plautus Amph. 195.

[348] Woodcock (1959), p. 102.

[349] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 317.

[350] Tsitseron, Tusk. Disp. 1.14.

[351] Plautus, Trin. 591.

[352] Postgate (1905), p. 443.

[353] Livy 1.58.5.

[354] Livy 9.4.2.

[355] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 317.

[356] Tsitseron, Beshinchi. 5.18.

[357] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 317.

[358] Tsitseron, Fil. 2.61.

[359] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 318.

[360] Tsitseron, Verr. 1.4.12.

[361] Livy, 9.33.7.

[362] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 387.

[363] Livy, 4.38.5.

[364] Gildersleeve & Lodge, (1895), p. 387; Woodcock (1959), pp. 139–40.

[365] Livy, 4.38.5.

[366] Andrewes (1951), p. 143.

[367] Andrewes (1951), p. 143.

[368] Sallust, Mushuk 34; contrast Caesar, B.G. 1.7.5.

[369] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334 note 1; Woodcock (1959), p. 22.

[370] Livy 2.6.8.

[371] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334, note 3.

[372] Tsitseron, Fam. 14.23.

[373] Tsitseron, Mil. 31.

[374] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 331, note 3.

[375] Seneca, dē Cōnsōlātiōne 11.16.1.

[376] Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.58.5.

[377] Tsitseron, Att. 9.6A.1.

[378] Woodcock (1959), p. 15.

[379] Sallust, Ko'za. 101.11.

[380] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.5.17.

[381] Tsitseron, Amīc. 73.

[382] Tsitseron, Att. 3.15.8.

[383] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 386; Woodcock (1959), p. 139.

[384] Juvenal, 10.123.

[385] Tsitseron, Planc. 60.

[386] Tsitseron, Dom. 5.

[387] Tsitseron, Fam. 6.13.1.

[388] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 180.

[389] Tsitseron, Mushuk 1.2.5.

[390] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1959), p. 333.

[391] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 181.

[392] Woodcock (1959), p. 21.

[393] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334.

[394] Tsitseron, O'chirilgan. 1.30.108.

[395] Nepos, Xann. 12.5.

[396] Lyuis va Qisqa, Lotin lug'ati, s.v. meminī.

[397] Seneca the Elder, Controversiae 3.7.16.

[398] Woodcock (1959), p. 102.

[399] Eutropius, 2.11.

[400] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.1.80.

[401] Bellum Alexandrīnum 10.

[402] Tsitseron Fam. 4.12.2.

[403] Livy, 1.58.5.

[404] Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.105.1.

[405] Tsitseron, Fam. 5.5.3.

[406] Nepos, Xann. 12.3.

[407] Woodcock (1959), p. 113.

[408] Terens, Hecyra 38.

[409] Woodcock (1959), p. 113.

[410] Qaysar, B.G. 1.3.7.

[411] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), pp. 165, 334.

[412] Tsitseron, Tusk. 1.34.

[413] Tatsitus, Ann. 14.9.

[414] Tsitseron, Verr. 2.4.86.

[415] Tsitseron, Div. 1.101.

[416] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 165.

[417] Tsitseron, Att. 16.16E.2.

[418] Woodcock (1959), p. 22; Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334, note 1.

[419] 23.13.6; qarz Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 334.

[420] Tsitseron, Tusk. 4.46.

[421] Tsitseron, Xira. 27.

[422] Woodcock (1959), p. 235.

[423] Livi, 30.15.

[424] Tsitseron, Post Reditum 17.

[425] Kintilian, 5.12.3.

[426] Terrell (1904) ko'plab misollarni to'playdi. Cf. shuningdek Woodcock (1959), 236-7 betlar; Allen va Greenough (1903), 383-4 bet.

[427] Tsitseron, dēv. 2.141.

[428] Pliniy, Ep. 4.22.6.

[429] Tsitseron, Fīn. 5.31.93.

[430] Tsitseron, Fam. 4.9.1.

[431] Allen va Greenough (1903), p. 383.

[432] Qaysar, Miloddan avvalgi 3.101.3.

[433] Woodcock (1959), p. 236.

[434] Tsitseron, Fam. 16.4.2.

[435] Tsitseron, Att. 4.15.2.

[436] Allen va Greenough (1903), p. 381.

[437] Livi 31.48.

[438] Tatsitus, Ann. 11.36.

[439] Kursiy, 3.8.20.

[440] Kursiy 4.5.6.

[441] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), 416-7 betlar.

[442] Woodcock (1959), p. 238; Pochta eshigi (1905); Ker (2007).

[443] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 340; Woodcock (1959), p. 238.

[444] Tsitseron, Tusk. Tashlab ketish. 5.105.

[445] Salmon (1931).

[446] Tsitseron, Att. 1.2.1.

[447] Donatus Ars Minor: de ishtirok etish; Kintilian 9.3.9.

[448] Woodcock (1959), p. 71.

[449] Kolumella, 9.16.4.

[450] Gildersleeve & Lodge (1895), p. 89.

[451] Tsitseron, Ver. 2.1.67

[452] Livi, 1.58.2.

[453] Livi, 1.58.7.

[454] Evtropiy, 2.11

[455] Woodcock (1959), p. 82.

[456] Pliniy, Ep. 6.16.9.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[42]

[43]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[53]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

[98]

[99]

[100]