Papa Pius XII va qirg'in - Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust

Kanadalik a'zolar Qirollik 22e Polk bilan tomoshabinlarda Papa Pius XII, 1944 yil Rim ozod qilinganidan keyin

Ning boshlanishi pontifikat ning Pius XII vaqtida sodir bo'lgan Ikkinchi jahon urushi va Natsistlar xolokosti urush paytida millionlab yahudiylar va boshqalar tomonidan o'ldirilgan Adolf Gitler Germaniya.[1] Pus urush paytida fashistlarning qurbonlariga yordam berish uchun diplomatiyani qo'llagan va o'z cherkovini yahudiylarga va boshqalarga aqlli yordam ko'rsatishga yo'naltirish orqali yuz minglab odamlarning hayotini saqlab qolgan.[2] Pius saqlanib qoldi Germaniya qarshiliklariga bog'langan va ittifoqchilar bilan razvedka ma'lumotlarini baham ko'rdi. Ammo uning genotsidni ommaviy ravishda qoralashi Ittifoqchi kuchlar tomonidan etarli emas deb topilgan, fashistlar esa uni Vatikanning betarafligi siyosatini haqorat qilgan Ittifoqdoshlarning xayrixohi sifatida ko'rishgan.[3]

Urushdan keyingi ba'zi tanqidchilar Piusni o'ta ehtiyotkorlikda, yoki "yetarlicha ishlamayotganlikda", hatto oldida "sukut saqlaganlikda" ayblashdi. Holokost. Shunga qaramay, tarafdorlari uning cherkoviga ularga muqaddas joy va yordam berishni buyurib, minglab, hatto o'nlab yoki yuz minglab yahudiylarni qutqarganini va fashistlar mafkurasining zo'ravon irqchiligiga qarshi axloqiy va intellektual etakchilik qilganini ta'kidladilar.[4][5][6][7]

Pius XII urushdan oldin Germaniyada Vatikan diplomati bo'lib xizmat qilgan Vatikan davlat kotibi ostida Pius XI. Ushbu lavozimda u natsizmni tanqid qilgan va 1937 yilgi loyihani tuzishda yordam bergan Mit brennender Sorge natsistlarga qarshi ensiklopediya. Uning 1939 yilida Summi Pontificatus birinchi papa entsikli, XII Piyus 1939 yil Polshaga bostirib kirish; qarshi katolik ta'limotini takrorladi irqchilik va antisemitizm; va "axloqiy tamoyillarga qarshi bo'lganlarga qarshi qarshilikni tasdiqladi."Sinayda vahiy " va Tog'dagi va'z.[iqtibos kerak ] 1942 yil Rojdestvoda, yahudiylarning sanoat qirg'iniga oid dalillar paydo bo'lgandan so'ng, u tashvish bildirdi "millati yoki irqi" sababli "yuz minglab" "beg'ubor" odamlarni o'ldirishda. 1942-1944 yillarda natsistlarning yahudiylarning turli mamlakatlardagi deportatsiyasini blokirovka qilishga urinish uchun Piyus aralashdi.[iqtibos kerak ] 1958 yilda vafot etgandan so'ng, Piyus tomonidan maqtovga sazovor bo'ldi Isroil tashqi ishlar vaziri,[8] va boshqa dunyo rahbarlari.[JSSV? ] Ammo uning Vatikanning betarafligi va mojaroni yovuz jinoyatchilar sifatida fashistlar deb atashdan saqlanishini talab qilishi, ayrim davrlarning zamonaviy va keyinchalik tanqidlari uchun asos bo'ldi. Vatikan arxivlari va xalqaro diplomatik yozishmalarni o'rganish davom etmoqda.

Fon

Natsistlar davrida ikki papa xizmat qilgan: Papa Pius XI (1922-1939) va Papa Pius XII (1939-1958). The Muqaddas qarang natsizmni 1920 yil oxirlari va 1930 yillar davomida qattiq tanqid qildi Kardinal Pacelli (keyinchalik Papa Piy XII), ayniqsa ochiq tanqidchi.[9] 1933 yilda Vatikan fashistlar hukumati davrida katoliklarning huquqlarini himoya qilish umidida Germaniya bilan Konkordatni imzoladi. Shartnoma shartlari Gitler tomonidan saqlanmagan. Ga ko'ra Britannica entsiklopediyasi: "1933 yildan 1936 yilgacha [XI Pius] Uchinchi Reyxga qarshi bir nechta noroziliklar yozgan va 1938 yilda Italiyaga fashistlarning irqiy siyosati kiritilgandan keyin uning fashistik Italiyaga munosabati keskin o'zgargan."[10]

Pius XI Evropa totalitarizmining ko'tarilish oqimiga qarshi uchta ensiklopediyani taklif qildi: Non abbiamo bisogno (1931; "Siz bilan tanishishning hojati yo'q" - Italiya fashizmiga qarshi); Mit brennender Sorge (1937; "Chuqur tashvish bilan" - natsizmga qarshi) va Divini redemptoris (1937; "Ilohiy Qutqaruvchi" - ateist kommunizmga qarshi). "Non abbiamo bisogno" italiyalik fashizmga "yoshlarni cherkovdan va Iso Masihdan tortib oladigan, o'z yoshlariga nafrat, zo'ravonlik va beparvolikni singdiradigan" butparast "harakat sifatida to'g'ridan-to'g'ri qarshi chiqdi.[11] XI Pius shuningdek, ekstremistik millatchilikka qarshi chiqdi Frantsuz aksiyasi Qo'shma Shtatlarda harakat va antisemitizm.[10]

Evropa urush yoqasida turgan XI Piyus 1939 yil 10 fevralda vafot etdi va Papelli uning o'rniga Papa Pius XII lavozimiga saylandi. Natsistlar hukumati uning taxtiga o'z vakilini yubormagan yagona hukumat edi.[12] Pius urushdan qochish uchun dunyo rahbarlarini qattiq lobbichilik qildi va keyin urush boshlangandan keyin diplomatiyani ogohlantirish siyosatini olib bordi.[9][13]

1942 yil atrofida fashistlar o'zlarini amalga oshirishni boshladilar yakuniy echim - Evropadagi yahudiylarning sanoat qirg'inlari.

Pontifikatsiyadan oldin fashistlar Germaniyasiga qarshi namoyishlar

Vatikan davlat kotibi sifatida, Kardinal Pacelli, natsistlar siyosatiga, shu jumladan uning "irq mafkurasiga" qarshi 55 ga yaqin norozilik namoyishlarini o'tkazdi.[12] Pacelli shuningdek Pius XI 1937 loyihasiga yordam berdi Mit brennender Sorge natsistlar mafkurasini tanqid qilish.[14] Qisman javoban yozilgan Nürnberg qonunlari, hujjatda Gitler yoki natsistlar nomiga ishora qilinmagan, ammo irqiy nazariyalar va irqqa asoslangan odamlarga nisbatan yomon muomalalar qoralangan.[14] 1938 yilda Kardinal Pacelli Pius XI ning nasroniylik va antisemitizmga mos kelmasligi haqidagi so'zlarini qayta takrorladi: "Xristianning antisemitizmda qatnashishi mumkin emas. Antisemitizmga yo'l qo'yilmaydi; ma'naviy jihatdan biz hammamiz semitmiz".[12]

1938

Vengriya evaristik kongressi

1938 yil davomida Vengriyada Budapeshtda Xalqaro Eucharistik konferentsiya bo'lib o'tdi. Kardinal Pachelli (keyinroq Papa Pius XII ) konferentsiyada nutq so'zlagan va, Holokost olimi va tarixchisining so'zlariga ko'ra Maykl Fayer, Pacelli yahudiylarni "lablari [Masihni] la'natlaydigan va yuragi uni bugun ham rad qiladigan" odamlar deb ta'riflagan. Fayerning ta'kidlashicha, Vengriyada antisemitizmga qarshi yangi qonunlar ishlab chiqilayotgan bir paytda, bu bayonotning vaqti Papa XI Piyning sentyabr oyida katoliklarni ruhiy otasi Ibrohimni hurmat qilishga chaqirgan bayonotiga zid bo'lgan.[15][16] Tarixchilar Ronald Richlak va kichik Uilyam Doino, Kardinal Pacelli yahudiylarni nazarda tutganligini inkor etadilar, chunki Time jurnali bu haqda konferentsiya hisobotida aytib o'tmadi.[17][a]

Rychlak va Dinooning so'zlariga ko'ra, Kardinal Pacelli o'z nutqining boshida Injil tarixi haqida gapirib, Masihning Passionini esladi va xochga mixlashga chaqirgan ommani "targ'ibot, yolg'on, haqorat va tahqirlardan aldangan va hayajonlangan" deb atadi. xochning oyog'i ", ammo yahudiylarga ishora qilmasdan.[17] Keyinchalik nutqida Pacelli o'sha paytda cherkovni dinni quvib chiqarish va nasroniylikni buzish kabi ishlar bilan ta'qib qilayotganlarni eslatib o'tdi va yahudiylar buni qilmaganligi sababli, fashistlar Germaniyasi edi, Papa "fashistlarni tenglashtirgan emas, balki Yahudiylar, ilgari cherkovni ta'qib qilganlarga ".[17] Ularning xabar berishicha, keyinchalik Pacelli o'z davrida totalitar tuzumlar (yahudiylar emas) orqali takrorlangan Masihning azoblari mavzusiga qaytgan va tinglovchilariga: "Masihning dushmanlari tomonidan qilingan" Xochga mixlang "degan hayqiriqning o'rnini bosaylik. , vafodorligimiz va sevgimizning "Hosanna" si bilan. "[17]

Biroq, Gabriel Uilenskiy Pacelli haqiqatan ham ilgari nutqida kommunistlar va natsistlar haqida gaplashishi mumkinligini qabul qilar ekan, u Rychlak va Dinooning yahudiylarni istisno qiladigan talqinini rad etdi, chunki u Pakelni "Uni xochga mixlang!" u Yangi Ahdni nazarda tutadi, unda yahudiylar "Uni xochga mixlanglar!"[18][b] Wilenskiyning ta'kidlashicha, Pacellining izohlari cherkov tomonidan bir paytlar yahudiylarni Masihni o'ldiruvchilar va deitsidlar sifatida tasvirlash uslubi stereotipik edi. (Shuningdek qarang La Civiltà Cattolica va Nostra aetate.)[18][c]

Nufuzli Vatikan jurnali La Civiltà Cattolica ushbu davrda Vengriya yahudiylariga qarshi hujumlarni davom ettirishni davom ettirishdi, agar Vengriya "Vengriya xalqining diniy, axloqiy va ijtimoiy hayoti uchun halokatli bo'lgan" yahudiylar ta'siridan xalos bo'lishi mumkin, faqat hukumat ularni mamlakatga kirishni taqiqlagan taqdirda.[19][20] Holokost tarixchisi Pol O'She ta'kidlaydi: "U [Pacelli] ning yahudiylarga qarshi g'azablariga qarshi bo'lganligi haqida hech qanday dalil yo'q. Civiltà Cattolica, XI Piyning davlat kotibi sifatida u hech bo'lmaganda sukut bilan ma'qullagan. Rim Papasi yoki uning davlat kotibi jurnalning tahririy mazmuni uchun so'nggi fiatni berdi. Kardinal Pacelli yozilgan Judeofobiya haqida bilishi mumkin emas Civiltà."[21]

1939

Natsistlar Pacellining Papa etib saylanishiga qarshi

Fashistlar rejimi Pacellining Papa etib saylanishini ma'qullamadi. Holokost tarixchisi Martin Gilbert shunday deb yozgan edi: "Gap shundaki, Gitler rejimi XI Piusning vorisi bo'lishiga yo'l qo'ymaslik uchun unga qarshi lobbichilik qilgan Pacellining tanqidlari shunchalik ochiq edi. U Papa bo'lganida, XII Pus singari, 1939 yil mart oyida fashistlar Germaniyasi yagona hukumat edi. uning tantanasiga vakili. "[12] Jozef Gebbels 1939 yil 4 martda o'zining kundaligida Gitler Rim bilan Konkordatni bekor qilish to'g'risida Pacellining Papa etib saylangani munosabati bilan uni bekor qilish to'g'risida o'ylayotganini ta'kidlab, "Bu, albatta, Pacelli o'zining birinchi dushmanlik xatti-harakatini amalga oshirganda sodir bo'ladi" deb aytdi.[22]

Urushdan qochish uchun qilingan harakatlar

XII Pius Ikkinchi Jahon urushi boshlanishiga yo'l qo'ymaslik uchun dunyo rahbarlarini lobbiya qildi.[14] Polsha bosib olindi, ammo Frantsiya va past o'lkalarga hujum qilinmadi, Pius mojaroning tarqalishini oldini olish uchun muzokaralar olib borilgan tinchlikka umidvor bo'lib qoldi. Xuddi shunday fikrlaydigan AQSh Prezidenti Franklin D. Ruzvelt yetmish yillik tanaffusdan so'ng Vatikan bilan Amerika diplomatik aloqalarini tiklay boshladi va jo'natildi Miron C. Teylor uning shaxsiy vakili sifatida.[23] Amerika yozishmalarida "tinchlik va azoblarni engillashtirish uchun parallel harakatlar" haqida so'z bordi.[24] Tinchlik umidlarining barbod bo'lishiga qaramay, Teylor missiyasi Vatikanda davom etdi.[23]

Irqiy qonunlarga munosabat

1939 yilda yangi saylangan Papa Piy XII bir necha taniqli yahudiy olimlarini fashistlar rahbarligi ostida Italiya universitetlaridan bo'shatilgandan so'ng Vatikandagi lavozimlarga tayinladi. Benito Mussolini irqiy qonunlar.[25] Keyinchalik Pius 1939 yil 23 iyunda rasmiy ravishda tasdiqlangan kelishuvni tuzdi Braziliyalik Prezident Getulio Vargas 3000 chiqarishga vizalar "oriy bo'lmagan katoliklarga".

Biroq keyingi o'n sakkiz oy davomida Braziliyaning Conselho de Imigração e Colonização (CIC) ularni chiqarishda cheklovlarni kuchaytirishda davom etdi, shu jumladan suvga cho'mish to'g'risidagi guvohnoma 1933 yilgacha tuzilgan, bu pul mablag'lariga sezilarli darajada o'tkazilgan Banco do Brasil va Braziliyadagi Berlinda targ'ibot byurosi tomonidan Berlindagi ma'qullash - o'n to'rt oy o'tgach, 1000dan kam viza berilganidan so'ng, dasturni bekor qilish bilan yakunlandi, qabul qilganlar orasida "noto'g'ri xatti-harakatlar" (ya'ni yahudiylikni davom ettirish) gumonlari ostida. vizalar.[26][27]

Entsiklik xat Summi Pontificatus

Summi Pontificatus birinchi bo'ldi ensiklopedik ning Papa Pius XII 1939 yil 20-oktabrda nashr etilgan. Entsiklopediya "Insoniyat jamiyati birligi to'g'risida" deb nomlangan.[28] Maktubni tayyorlash paytida Ikkinchi Jahon urushi fashistlarning / Sovetlarning katolik Polshaga bostirib kirishi bilan boshlandi. Diplomatik tilda gaplashadigan Pius katoliklarning qarshiliklarini qo'llab-quvvatlaydi va urush, irqchilik, fashistlar / sovetlarga qarshi munosabatni bildiradi. Polshaga bostirib kirish va cherkovning ta'qiblari.[29] Quyidagi mavzular Non abbiamo bisogno (1931), Mit brennender Sorge (1937) va Divini redemptoris (1937), Piyus "yolg'on me'yorga amal qilganlarni ... xato, ehtiros, vasvasa va xurofot bilan adashtirganlarni, haqiqiy Xudoga ishonishdan uzoqlashganlarni" qaytarish kerakligi haqida yozgan.[30] U "masihiylar, afsuski, aslida nomidan ko'proq", bu aqidalar tomonidan ta'qib qilinishida "qo'rqoqlik" ko'rsatganligi va qarshilikni qo'llab-quvvatlaganligi haqida yozgan:

Masihning askarlari orasida kim - ruhoniy yoki oddiy odam - Masihning dushmanlari tobora ko'payib borayotgan uy egasini ko'rib, o'zini yanada hushyorroq, qat'iyatli qarshilik ko'rsatishga undagan va qo'zg'atgan deb hisoblamaydi; u bu tendentsiyalarning so'zlovchilarini sezganidek, jonli haqiqatlarni va Xudoga va Masihga ishonishga xos qadriyatlarni inkor etadi yoki amalda e'tiborsiz qoldiradi; Xudoning amrlari jadvallarini Sinayda Vahiyning axloqiy mazmunidan mahrum qilingan boshqa jadvallarni va boshqa me'yorlarni almashtirish uchun Xudoning amrlari jadvallarini buzayotganini sezganligi sababli, Tog'dagi va Xochdagi va'zning ruhi hech qanday joyga ega emasmi?

— Pius XII, Summi Pontificatus[30]

Pius rahmdillik "huquqiga" ega bo'lgan jabrdiydalarga "xayriya" qilishni talab qiladigan vaqt haqida yozgan.

Jon Kornuell "inson zoti birligi" mavzusidagi "qudratli so'zlarni" va Masihda "na yunon, na yahudiy, na sunnat va na sunnat" mavjud emasligi to'g'risida Avliyo Polning so'zlaridan foydalanishni ta'kidlaydi.[31] Frenk Koppa "To'g'ri, Pius XII ning 1939 yil 20-oktabrdagi birinchi ensiklopediyasi totalitar kuchlar tomonidan ilgari surilgan mutlaq davlat hokimiyatining da'volarini rad etdi, ammo uni denonsatsiya qilish konkret emas, umumiy va tushunarli edi".[32]

G'arbiy ittifoqchilar Germaniyaga Papa entsiklopediyasining tarjimasi bo'lgan varaqalarni tashladilar va tarkibini tarqatdilar.[33] Berlinda fon Bergen Papa betaraf bo'lishni to'xtatdi, Italiyada Mussolini uni bosib chiqarishga ruxsat berdi.[34] Gyunter Lyuni ta'kidlashicha, Gestapo tarkibni etarlicha "zararsiz va noaniq" deb hisoblagan, chunki ular minbarlardan o'qishga imkon bergan.[35] Bundan tashqari, u Papaning "qarama-qarshilikdan qo'rqmasdan" haqiqat to'g'risida guvohlik berish "niyati bilan bog'liq bo'lgan ensiklopediyadagi talaffuzlari va nemis episkopati tomonidan bildirilgan shunga o'xshash fikrlar" yahudiy fojiasi oldida bo'sh formula bo'lib qoldi "dedi. .[36][37] Shoul Fridlender shuningdek, Pus yahudiylarni ta'qib qilish haqida hech narsa demaganligini ta'kidlaydi.[38] Syuzan Zukkotti Pius "dahshatli dahshatlar oldida keyingi sukunati nuri" da qomusiyda berilgan va'dalarni bajara olmagani uchun "dismally" muvaffaqiyatsizlikka uchradi. Tsukotti uchun bu xatni yahudiylikka qarshi kampaniya sifatida tasvirlash mumkin emas, ammo baribir "qimmatli bayonot" bilan chiqqan.[39] Ouen Chadvikning ta'kidlashicha, nemislar, hatto uni ko'plab minbarlardan o'qishga imkon berib, uni bosib chiqarishni va tarqatishni to'xtatdilar va Gestapo uni o'qigan yoki tarqatmoqchi bo'lgan odamlarni so'roq qilishni buyurdi. Chadvik shunday xulosaga keladi Summi Pontificatus "o'z yo'lida bu kabi fashistlar siyosatiga qarshi kuchli hujum edi Mit brennender Sorge Pius XI ".[40]

Irqchilikka qarshi

Yilda Summi Pontificatus, Pius XII katoliklarning irqchilik va antisemitizmga qarshi chiqishini quyidagi so'zlar bilan takrorladi:

Ushbu tenglik printsiplariga muvofiq, cherkov o'z g'amxo'rligini madaniy mahalliy ruhoniylarni shakllantirish va mahalliy episkoplar sonini ko'paytirishga bag'ishlaydi. Bularga tashqi ko'rinish berish uchun, bizning niyatimiz, biz Havoriylar maqbarasida Episkopal qadr-qimmatini ko'tarish uchun yaqinlashib kelayotgan Shoh Masihning Bayramini tanladik. Insoniyatni ajratib turadigan buzg'unchilik qarama-qarshiliklari o'rtasida, ushbu tantanali tadbir butun dunyoga tarqalgan barcha o'g'illarimizga, cherkovning ruhi, ta'limoti va ishi hech qachon Havoriyning so'zlaridan boshqa bo'lishi mumkin emasligini e'lon qilsin. G'ayriyahudiylar: "O'zini yaratganning qiyofasiga ko'ra, yangi bilimga ega bo'lganni (odamni) kiyinglar. G'ayriyahudiylar ham, yahudiylar ham, sunnat ham, sunnatsizlar ham, barbarlar ham, skiflar ham qul, ham erkin". Ammo Masih hamma narsada "(Kolosaliklarga iii. 10, 11).

— Pius XII, Summi Pontificatus[41]

Ronald Richlak "G'ayriyahudiylar va yahudiylarning tenglashtirilishi Gitlerning asosiy mafkurasini aniq rad etish sifatida qaralishi kerak edi" deb yozgan edi.[42] Martin Ronxaymer matnni irqchilikka qarshi "aniq" ma'lumot yo'qligi bilan izohlagan, ammo "inson zoti birligi" bo'limida unga "yashirin" havolani o'z ichiga olgan, chunki u irqchilikka qarshi hech qachon nashr etilmagan ensiklopediyaning aks-sadosi deb o'ylaydi. antisemitizm va "yahudiylar savoli" bilan shug'ullangan, mavzular ko'rib chiqilmagan Summi Pontificatus.[43] Ronxaymer ensiklopediyada ijtimoiy, siyosiy va iqtisodiy antisemitizmning an'anaviy anti-yahudiylik tomonidan qo'zg'atilgan va uni katoliklar turli darajalarda baham ko'rgan "zamonaviy shakli" qoralanmagan deb hisoblagan.[43] (Shuningdek qarang La Civiltà Cattolica va Papa Pius XI Belgiyalik ziyoratchilarga nutq )

Polshaga bostirib kirish

Yilda Summi Pontificatus, keyin Polshaga bostirib kirish Natsistlar Germaniyasi va Sovet Ittifoqi tomonidan Piy XII urush boshlanishidan noroziligini bildirdi - "urushning dahshatli shiddati, uni oldini olish uchun qilgan barcha harakatlarimizga qaramay allaqachon kuchaymoqda" - va Polsha xalqiga hamdardligini va tirilish umidini bildirdi. ularning millati:

Son-sanoqsiz odamlarning, hattoki jang qilmaydiganlarning qoni bizning aziz Polsha singari xalqqa nisbatan achinarli g'azabni keltirib chiqarmoqda, bu cherkovga sodiqligi, xristian tsivilizatsiyasini himoya qilishdagi xizmatlari uchun yilnomalarda o'chmas belgilar bilan yozilgan. tarix, butun dunyoning saxovatli va birodarlik hamdardligiga haqli, ammo u Maryamning kuchli shafoati, xristianlarning yordami, adolat va haqiqiy tinchlik tamoyillariga muvofiq ravishda tirilish soatiga tayanib kutmoqda.

— Pius XII, Summi Pontificatus[29]

Phayer (2000) ensiklopediyani urushni qoralaydi, ammo bosqinni qoralamaydi deb talqin qiladi.

Polshadagi katolik cherkovi shafqatsiz fashistlar qatag'oniga duchor bo'ldi.

1942 yil may oyida Rim Papasi fashistlar tomonidan bosib olingan Polsha (Vurtellandiya) erlariga nemis apostol ma'murini tayinladi. Phayer (2008) fikriga ko'ra, bu Polshaning parchalanishini tan olinishi sifatida qabul qilingan va bu Piusning bosqinni aniq tsenzura qilmasligi bilan birga polyaklar orasida xiyonat tuyg'usini keltirib chiqargan.[44]

1942 yil dekabrda surgundagi Polsha Prezidenti XII Piyusga "sukunatni Apostollik qarorgohi buzishi kerak" deb murojaat qildi.[45]

Yashirin ensiklopediya

Valter Bussmannning ta'kidlashicha, Pacelli, masalan Kardinal davlat kotibi, fikridan qaytdi Papa Pius XI - o'sha paytda kim o'limga yaqin edi[46] - qoralashdan Kristallnaxt 1938 yil noyabrda,[47] unga bu haqda Berlinda papa nuncio xabar berganida.[26] Xuddi shu tarzda 1938 yil sentyabrga qadar ensikl uchun tayyorlangan qoralama Humani generis unitas ("Inson irqining birligi to'g'risida"), matn loyihasining ikki nashriyotiga ko'ra[48] va boshqa manbalar, Iezvit generali tomonidan Vatikanga yuborilmagan Vlodimir Ledoxovskiy.[49] Papa Piy XI vafotidan o'n bir kun oldin, 1939 yil 28 yanvarda hafsalasi pir bo'lgan Gundlax muallif La Farjga: "Bunday davom etishi mumkin emas. Matn Vatikanga yuborilmagan", deb xabar bergan.

U general Otaning amerikalik yordamchisi bilan suhbatlashdi, u 1938 yil dekabrida bu masalani ko'rib chiqishni va'da qildi, ammo bu haqda xabar bermadi.[50] Unda ochiq va ravshan hukm qilingan mustamlakachilik, irqchilik va antisemitizm.[49][51] Ba'zi tarixchilarning ta'kidlashicha, Pacelli uning mavjudligi to'g'risida XI Pyus vafotidan keyingina bilgan va uni Papa deb e'lon qilmagan.[d] Ammo u o'zining ingliz tili ensiklopediyasida bu qismlardan foydalangan Summi Pontificatus, u "Inson jamiyatining birligi to'g'risida" deb nomlangan.[28]

1940–1941

Pius Germaniya qarshiliklariga yordam beradi

Xolokost Germaniyaning Evropani bosib olishi natijasida amalga oshirildi. XII Pius bu zabt etishni to'xtatishga urindi. Polsha ag'darib tashlandi, ammo Frantsiya va past mamlakatlarga hali ham hujum qilinmadi Germaniya qarshiligi Gitlerni ag'darish uchun davlat to'ntarishiga tayyorgarlik ko'rishda Papadan yordam so'radi. Polkovnik Xans Oster Abwehr Myunxen advokati va dindor katolik yubordi, Xosef Myuller, rivojlanayotgan uchastkada papadan yordam so'rash uchun Rimga yashirin sayohatda.[52] Pius, Britaniyaliklar bilan aloqada Frensis d'Arcy Osborne, maxfiy ravishda oldinga va orqaga yo'naltirilgan aloqa.[53] Papa Belgiya va Gollandiya hukumatlarini Germaniya 1940 yil 10-mayga bostirib kirishni rejalashtirayotgani to'g'risida ogohlantirdi.[54] Ga binoan Piter Xebbletxayt, nemislar "Papaning xatti-harakatlarini josuslikka teng deb hisoblashgan".[55] Frantsiyaning qulashidan keyin Vatikandan tinchlik avtoulovlari davom etmoqda, bunga Cherchill Germaniya avval bosib olingan hududlarini ozod qilishi kerak, deb qat'iy javob berdi.[56] Muzokaralar oxir-oqibat samarasiz bo'lib chiqdi. Gitlerning Frantsiya va past mamlakatlar ustidan tezkor g'alabalari Germaniya harbiylarining Gitlerga qarshi turish irodasini buzdi.[57] Qarshilik va Pius aloqa qilishni davom ettirdilar.

1940 yahudiylar nomidan so'rov

1940 yilda Pius ruhoniylardan Vatikandagi firma blankalarida internirlangan yahudiylar nomidan qo'llaridan kelgan barcha ishni qilishni iltimos qildi.[58]

1942

1942 yil kardinallar kollejiga Rojdestvo manzili

1942 yil dekabrda Rim kuriyasi a'zolariga Rojdestvo nutqida Pius XII cherkov ham, uning xizmatchilari ham ruhlarning farovonligi uchun haqiqat va fazilatni himoya qilishga urinishlarida "ziddiyat belgisini" qanday boshdan kechirayotganliklari to'g'risida gapirdi. Rim Papasi bunday sevgi va qurbonlik sa'y-harakatlari baribir afsuslanish, dadillik yoki havoriylik jasorati va g'ayratini susaytirishi uchun sabablar keltira oladimi degan savol tug'diradi. U salbiy javob beradi:

Havoriyning munosib nolasi ... bu Najotkorning yuragiga ta'sir qilgani va uni Quddusni ko'rib ko'z yoshlarini to'kishiga sabab bo'lganligi, uning da'vati va inoyati bu o'jar ko'rlikka va o'jar tanib bo'lmaslikka qarshi bo'lgan joy, bu uni aybdorlik yo'lida, oxir-oqibat deitsidga olib boradi.

— Papa Pius XII[59]

Tarixchi Gvido Knopp Piyusning ushbu izohlarini "Quddus millionlar tomonidan o'ldirilayotgan" bir paytda "tushunarsiz" deb ta'riflaydi.[60]

Nederlandiya

1942 yil 26-iyulda Gollandiya yepiskoplari, shu jumladan arxiyepiskop Yoxannes de Yong, natsistlarning Gollandiyalik ishchilar va yahudiylarning deportatsiyasini ochiqchasiga qoralagan farmon chiqardi. Natsistlarning javobi 40 000 dan ortiq yahudiy kelib chiqishi bo'lgan katoliklarni birlashtirdi. Ushbu tadbirdan so'ng, opa Paskalina Lehnert Rim Papasi yepiskopning noroziligi qirq ming kishining umriga zomin bo'lgan bo'lsa-da, uning noroziligi, u qurbon qilishga tayyor bo'lmaganligi uchun kamida ikki yuz ming begunoh odamning hayotini anglatishini aytdi. Siyosatchilar, generallar va diktatorlar odamlar hayoti bilan o'ynashlari mumkin bo'lsa-da, Papa buni qila olmadi. Pius XII 1940 yilda Italiyaning Vatikandagi elchisiga aytgan gaplarini tez-tez takrorlar edi: "Biz bunday harakatlarga (nemislarning vahshiyliklariga) qarshi otashin so'zlarni aytmoqchimiz va bizni gapirishga to'sqinlik qiladigan narsa bu qurbonlarning ahvoliga tushishdan qo'rqishdir. bundan ham yomoni. "[61]

1942 ta xat

1942 yil 18-sentyabrda Piyusga xat keldi Monsignor Montini (kelajak) Papa Pol VI ), "yahudiylarning qirg'inlari qo'rqinchli darajada va shakllarga erishmoqda". O'sha oyning oxirida, Miron Teylor, AQShning Vatikandagi vakili, Piyusga Vatikanning "axloqiy obro'si" Evropadagi vahshiyliklarga sukut bilan jarohat etkazayotgani haqida ogohlantirdi. Fayerning so'zlariga ko'ra, ushbu ogohlantirish Buyuk Britaniya, Braziliya, Urugvay, Belgiya va Polsha vakillari tomonidan bir vaqtning o'zida takrorlangan.[62]

1942 yil 26-sentyabrda Teylor AQSh hukumatiga tegishli memorandumni Piyusga bergan bo'lib, unda Falastinning yahudiylar agentligidan olingan ma'lumotlarga asoslanib, yahudiylar butun dunyo bo'ylab. Natsistlar imperiyasi muntazam ravishda "so'yish" qilinayotgan edi. Teylor Vatikanda "hisobotlarni tasdiqlash" tendentsiyasiga ega bo'lgan ma'lumotlarga ega bo'lishi mumkinmi va agar shunday bo'lsa, Papa jamoatchilik fikriga "barbarlik" ga qarshi ta'sir o'tkazishi mumkin bo'lgan narsalarni so'radi.[63] Kardinal Maglione uzatdi Garold X. Tittmann, kichik 10 oktyabrdagi xatga javob. Yozuvda Vashingtonga razvedka ma'lumotlarini uzatgani uchun minnatdorchilik bildirilgan va yahudiylarga qarshi qattiq choralar to'g'risidagi xabarlar boshqa manbalardan Vatikanga etib borgani tasdiqlangan, ammo "ularning to'g'riligini tekshirish" imkoni bo'lmagan. Shunga qaramay, "Muqaddas Taxt tomonidan har qanday imkoniyatdan foydalanilmoqda, ammo bu baxtsiz odamlarning azoblarini engillashtirish uchun".[64]

1942 yil dekabrda, Tittmann Kardinal davlat kotibi Magliondan Pius "Yahudiylar irqini yo'q qilish bo'yicha Germaniya siyosati" degan Ittifoq deklaratsiyasiga o'xshash deklaratsiya beradimi deb so'raganida, Maglione Vatikan "ommaviy ravishda sodir etilgan vahshiyliklarni qoralashga qodir emas" deb javob berdi.[65]

Rojdestvo 1942 yilgi xabar

1942 yildagi Rojdestvo murojaatida Pius XII dunyoga "o'zining nojo'ya ekanligining ayanchli isboti bo'lgan ijtimoiy tuzum xarobalariga" uzoq va qattiq qarashga chaqirdi.[66]

Insoniyat urush bo'roni o'z vatanidan sug'urib olib, musofir yurtiga tarqalib ketgan son-sanoqsiz surgunlarga qasamyod qiladi; kim o'zlarini Payg'ambar alayhissalomning kuyini yasashlari mumkin: "Bizning merosimiz musofirlarga, uyimiz musofirlarga topshirildi". Insoniyat, o'zlarining aybisiz, ba'zan faqat millati yoki irqi tufayli o'limga yoki sekin yo'q qilinishga mahkum bo'lgan yuz minglab odamlarga va'da beradi.

— XII Pius, Rojdestvo radiosi manzili, 1942 yil

Reynxard Xaydrix Reyxning Markaziy xavfsizlik idorasi Piusning Rojdestvo xabarini tahlil qildi va xulosa qildi:

Rim Papasi ilgari hech qachon ma'lum bo'lmagan tarzda Milliy Sotsialistik Yangi Evropa tartibidan voz kechdi. Uning radio ajratishi Milliy Sotsialistik Veltanschauungning ruhoniy soxtalashtirilishining eng yaxshi asari edi ... Papa Germaniyadagi sotsialistlarni nomma-nom aytmaydi, lekin uning nutqi biz tarafdor bo'lgan hamma narsalarga uzoq davom etgan hujum ... Xudo, deydi u, barcha xalqlarga nisbatan va xuddi shu e'tiborga loyiq musobaqalar. Bu erda u yahudiylar nomidan aniq gapirmoqda ... Ushbu nutq faqat Evropada yangi tartibga qarshi qaratilganligi, Milliy sotsializmda ko'rinib turibdiki, papa bayonotida insoniyat "urush paytida yutqazganlarning hammasiga qarzdor" degan bayonotida aniq ko'rsatilgan. ularning Vatani va ular, garchi shaxsan benuqson bo'lsa-da, faqat millati va kelib chiqishi tufayli o'ldirilgan yoki qashshoqlikka aylangan ". Bu erda u deyarli nemis xalqini yahudiylarga nisbatan adolatsizlikda ayblamoqda va o'zini yahudiy harbiy jinoyatchilarining og'ziga aylantirmoqda.

Aksincha, ko'ra Galeazzo Ciano, Mussolini papaning xabarini istehzo bilan izohladi: "Bu dadillik nutqi, Predappioning cherkov ruhoniysi aytishi mumkin".[67]

1943

Ad maiora mala vitanda

1943 yil 30-aprelda Piyus Berlin episkopi Von Preysingga shunday deb yozgan edi: "Biz mahalliy darajada ishlaydigan cho'ponlarga repressiyalar va turli xil zulmlar xavfliligini va qay darajada xavfliligini aniqlash vazifasini beramiz. episkop deklaratsiyalari ... ad maiora mala vitanda (yomonroq bo'lishidan saqlanish uchun) ... ehtiyot bo'lishni maslahat berganga o'xshaydi. O'z nutqimizda nega o'zimizni tiyib qo'yganimiz sabablaridan biri shu erda; 1942 yilda biz imonlilarga etkazishga vakolat bergan papa manzillari bilan qilgan tajribamiz, bizning fikrimizcha, bizning fikrimizni oqlaydi. ... Muqaddas Taxt xayriya, moddiy va ma'naviy yordam bilan qo'lidan kelgan barcha ishni qildi. Muhojirlarning yo'l haqi uchun Amerika puliga sarflagan katta mablag'larimiz haqida hech narsa demaslik kerak. "[68]

Ota Skavitssidan yangiliklar

1943 yil bahorida italiyalik ruhoniy Pirro Skavitssi Piyusga yahudiylarning o'ldirilishi "endi umuman", hatto keksalar va chaqaloqlar ham "rahm-shafqatsiz" yo'q qilinayotganini aytdi. Ma'lumotlarga ko'ra, Pus buzilib ketgan va o'zini tutolmay yig'lagan.[69]

Pius ota Skavitssiga shunday dedi: "Men butun dunyo oldida dahshatli genotsid jinoyati uchun jirkanchlikni o'ylayman. Ammo ko'p ibodat qilib va ​​ko'p ko'z yoshlarini to'kkanimdan keyin, mening mahkumligim yahudiylarga yordam bermasdan qolmasligini tushunaman. Hatto ularning ahvolini yomonlashtirishi ham mumkin ... Shubhasiz, norozilik namoyishi madaniyatli dunyoning maqtovi va hurmatiga sazovor bo'lar edi, ammo bu bechora yahudiylarni bundan ham dahshatli ta'qibga duchor qilgan bo'lar edi. "[70]

O'g'irlashga urinish

1943 yilda Gitler tomonidan Vatikanni bosib olish va Piusni va kardinallarni hibsga olish rejalari ishlab chiqilgan. Rim kuriyasi.[71][72][73] Ga binoan Ruhoniy Piter Gumpel, Piusni kanonizatsiya qilish jarayoniga mas'ul bo'lgan tarixchi Papa etakchi episkoplarga fashistlar tomonidan hibsga olinishi kerakligi, uning iste'fosi darhol kuchga kirishi va Muqaddas Taxt boshqa mamlakatga ko'chib o'tishi kerakligini aytdi. Portugaliya, qaerda Kardinallar kolleji yangi papani saylaydi.[74] Ba'zi tarixchilar Gitlerning Papani qo'lga kiritmoqchi bo'lishining sababi, Piusning fashistlarning yahudiylarga bo'lgan munosabatiga qarshi gapirishni davom ettirishidan xavotirda edi.[74][75] Biroq, reja hech qachon amalga oshirilmadi va xabarlarga ko'ra fashistlar generali tomonidan bajarilmadi Karl Volf. Britaniyalik tarixchi Ouen Chadvik va Iezuit ADSS muharriri Robert A. Grem fitnaning mavjudligini " Siyosiy urush boshqaruvi. Biroq, ushbu hisobotlardan so'ng, Dan Kurzman 2007 yilda o'zi yuritgan asarni nashr etdi va syujetni haqiqat deb topdi.[76][77]

Germaniyaning Rimni bosib olishi

Jozef Lixtenning so'zlariga ko'ra, Vatikan Rimdagi yahudiylar jamoat kengashi tomonidan fashistlarning yuzta talabini bajarishga yordam berishga chaqirilgan Troy funtlari (37,3 kilogramm) oltin. Kengash yetmish funt (26,1 kg.) To'play oldi, ammo o'ttiz olti soat ichida ishlab chiqarilgan mablag 'uch yuz yahudiy qamoqqa olinishi aytilmagan bo'lsa. Rim bosh ravvin Zolli so'zlariga ko'ra, Papa muddatsiz cheksiz foizsiz kredit taklif qildi.[78][79] Biroq, Rim yahudiylari jamoasi talabni bajara oldilar va oltinni 28-sentabr kuni bosqinchilarga etkazib berishdi.[80] To'lov to'langaniga qaramay, 1015 yahudiy 1943 yil 16 oktyabrda deportatsiya qilingan Rim razziyasi va ularning aksariyati kontsentratsiya va o'lim lagerlarida o'ldirilgan.[81] Boshqa ko'plab odamlar 1944 yil 24 martda o'ldirilgan Fosse ardeatin.

Nuncio Orsenigoning Gitlerga qilgan murojaati

Sezare Orsenigo Gitler va fon Ribbentrop bilan

1943 yil noyabrda nuncio Sezare Orsenigo Papa Piy XII nomidan Uchinchi Reyx rahbari bilan gaplashdi. Gitler bilan suhbatda u yahudiylarni nazarda tutgan holda Uchinchi Reyxdagi ta'qib qilingan xalqlarning holati haqida gapirdi. Fashistlar rahbari bilan bu suhbat muvaffaqiyatga olib kelmadi. Gitler suhbatning katta qismida Orsenigoni e'tiborsiz qoldirdi; u deraza oldiga borib, quloq solmadi.[82][e]

1944–1945

Anjelo Ronkalining harakatlari

Pius XII atrofidagi tarixiy munozaralarning bir qismi urush paytida yahudiylarni qutqarishda Nuncio Angelo Roncalli, kelajakdagi Jon XXIIIning roli bilan bog'liq. Ba'zi tarixchilar Roncalli Papa nomidan nuntsio vazifasini bajargan deb ta'kidlashsa, boshqalari u yahudiylar nomidan aralashganida o'z-o'zidan harakat qilganini aytgan, chunki bu juda mustaqil pozitsiya paytida paydo bo'ladi. Yahudiy etimlarning qarama-qarshiligi.[83] Maykl Fayerning so'zlariga ko'ra, Ronkalli har doim yahudiylarni qutqarish bo'yicha harakatlarida Pius XII buyrug'i bilan ish tutganligini aytgan.[84]

Ga ko'ra Raul Wallenberg jamg'armasi, Roncalli Vatikanga boshqa betaraf davlatlar yahudiylarga boshpana beradimi yoki yo'qmi, Germaniya hukumatiga Falastin Yahudiy agentligi 5000 immigratsiya guvohnomasi borligi to'g'risida xabar berish va Vatikan radiosidan yahudiylarga yordam berish rahm-shafqat harakati ekanligini so'rab murojaat qildi. cherkov tomonidan tasdiqlangan. 1944 yilda Ronkalli suvga cho'mish to'g'risidagi guvohnomalarni, immigratsion guvohnomalarni va vizalarni - ularning ko'pchiligini soxtalashtirilgan holda - venger yahudiylariga etkazish va berish uchun diplomatik kuryerlar, papa vakillari va Sion xonim singillarimizdan foydalangan. 1944 yil 16-avgustda Roncalliydan papa nuncio-dan Vengriyaga yuborilgan xabar "Suvga cho'mish operatsiyasi" ning intensivligini namoyish etadi.[iqtibos kerak ]

Rim razziya

1943 yil 28 oktyabrda, Ernst fon Vaytsekker Germaniyaning Vatikandagi elchisi Berlinga telegramma orqali "Papa Rim yahudiylarining deportatsiyasini rasmiy ravishda qoralashga hali ham ishontirilishiga yo'l qo'ymadi. ... Hozir nemislar bundan buyon hech qanday qadam tashlamaydilar deb o'ylashadi. Rimdagi yahudiylarga qarshi bizning Vatikan bilan munosabatlarimiz masalasi yopiq deb hisoblanishi mumkin. "[85][86]

O'lim to'g'risida hukm chiqarilgandan so'ng, Adolf Eyxmann o'z kundaligida Rim yahudiylarining to'planib qolgani haqida shunday yozgan edi: "O'sha paytda mening idoramga Rimdagi katolik cherkovi tomonidan yuborilgan to'g'ridan-to'g'ri boshliqlarimga bergan xatning nusxasi keldi. Episkop Xudal, Rimdagi nemis kuchlari qo'mondoni general Staxelga. Cherkov yahudiylarning hibsga olinishiga qattiq norozilik bildirmoqda Italiya fuqaroligi, bunday harakatlarning Rim va uning atrofida zudlik bilan to'xtatilishini so'rab. Aksincha, Papa buni ommaviy ravishda qoralaydi ... Kuriya ayniqsa g'azablandi, chunki bu voqealar deyarli Vatikan derazalari ostida sodir bo'lgan. Ammo, aynan o'sha paytda, Cherkovning pozitsiyasiga ahamiyat bermasdan Italiya fashistik hukumati barcha italiyalik yahudiylarni kontsentratsion lagerlarga deportatsiya qilishni buyurgan qonun qabul qildi. ... berilgan e'tirozlar va operatsiyani amalga oshirishni yakunlash uchun zarur bo'lgan qadamlarning haddan tashqari kechikishi juda katta qismga olib keldi Italiya yahudiylari yashirinish va qo'lga olinishdan qochish. "[87]

Tarixchi Syuzan Zukkotti, muallif "Uning Windows ostida: Vatikan va Italiyadagi qirg'in "," Papa jim tursa, u o'zining yeparxiyasida rohibalar, rohiblar, ruhoniylar va prelatlarga, shu jumladan Vikaraytadagi bir nechta odamlarga o'zlarini yahudiylarni qutqarishga jalb qilishlariga ruxsat berdi. Ko'pgina cherkov muassasalari, shu jumladan Vatikan mulklari yahudiylarni uzoq vaqt davomida boshqa qochqinlar bilan birga panoh topgan. "[88][89] Jeyms Kurt o'zining inshoida Papa Pius XIIga tuhmat qilish, u [Syuzan Zukkotti] "Piy XII hatto Rim yahudiylarini" uning derazalari ostidan "deportatsiya qilishga yo'l qo'yganligi to'g'risida bahslashmoqchi" deb yozadi. Buning uchun u rim yahudiylarining ko'pligi to'g'risida jim turishi kerak. Cherkov Papaning ma'qullashi bilan Gestapo va hamkorlikdagi fashist politsiyasining "derazalari ostida" monastirlar, ibodatxonalar, maktablar va shifoxonalarning keng tarmog'iga yashiringan.[90] Kurt o'z maqolasini tugatadi "Bu hozirgi va davom etayotgan xolokost paytida [abort] ularni yolg'on ayblab, Papa va Cherkovning sukunati va passivligiga erishmoqchi bo'lgan bu liberallar va radikallarning buzuqligi va ikkiyuzlamachiligining namoyishi. oltmish yil oldingi Holokost paytida sukut va passivlik jinoyati. "[90]

2006 yil avgust oyida Monastir rohibasining 60 yoshli kundaligidan ko'chirmalar Santi Kvatro Koronati[91] Papa Piy XII Ikkinchi Jahon urushi paytida yahudiylarni yashirish uchun Rimning cherkovlari va monastirlariga buyruq bergani haqida Italiya matbuotida e'lon qilindi.[92]

Yahudiylarning katoliklikni qabul qilishi

The Holokost paytida yahudiylarning katoliklikni qabul qilishi yozuvining eng munozarali jihatlaridan biridir Papa Pius XII o'sha davrda. Rot va Ritnerning fikriga ko'ra, "bu muhim nuqta, chunki Pius XII haqidagi munozaralarda uning himoyachilari muntazam ravishda irqchilikni rad etish va yahudiy diniga kirganlarni himoya qilish har xil antisemitizmga qarshi isbot sifatida ko'rsatadilar".[93] The Holocaust is one of the most acute examples of the "recurrent and acutely painful issue in the Catholic-Jewish dialogue", namely "Christian efforts to convert Jews".[94]

Meeting with Churchill

In August 1944, following the Liberation of Rome Pius met British Prime Minister Uinston Cherchill, shaharga tashrif buyurgan. At their meeting, the Pope acknowledged the justice of punishing war criminals, but expressed a hope that the people of Italy would not be punished, but, with the war continuing, he hoped that they would be made "full allies".[95]

Holocaust by country

Avstriya

In 1941, Cardinal Teodor Innitser ning Vena informed Pius of Jewish deportations in Vienna.

Xorvatiya

Arxiyepiskop Stepinak deb nomlangan sinod of Croatian bishops in November 1941. The synod appealed to Croatian leader Ante Pavelić to treat Jews "as humanely as possible, considering that there were German troops in the country". The Vatican replied with praise to Marcone with praise for what the synod had done for "citizens of Jewish origin", although Israeli historian Menachem Shelah demonstrates that the synod concerned itself only with converted Jews. Pius XII personally praised the synod for "courage and decisiveness".[96]

Frantsiya

Later in 1941, when asked by French Marshal Filipp Pétain if the Vatican objected to anti-Jewish laws, Pius responded that the Church condemned antisemitism, but would not comment on specific rules. Xuddi shunday, qachon Filipp Pétain 's regime adopted the "Jewish statutes", the Vichi ambassador to the Vatican, Leon Berad (a French politician), was told that the legislation did not conflict with Catholic teachings.[97] Valerio Valeri, nuncio to France was "embarrassed" when he learned of this publicly from Pétain[98] and personally checked the information with Cardinal Secretary of State Maglione[99] who confirmed the Vatican's position.[100]

Yet in June 1942 Pius personally protested against the mass deportations of Jews from France, ordering the papal nuncio to protest to Marshal Pétain against "the inhuman arrests and deportations of Jews".[101] In October 1941 Harold Tittman, a U.S. delegate to the Vatican, asked the pope to condemn the atrocities against Jews; Pius replied that the Vatican wished to remain "neutral",[102] reiterating the neutrality policy which Pius invoked as early as September 1940.[97]

Vengriya

Before the Holocaust began an International Eucharistic Conference took place in Budapest in Hungary during 1938. Cardinal Pacelli addressed the congress and described the Jews as people "whose lips curse [Christ] and whose hearts reject him even today". Maykl Fayer asserts that the timing of the statement, during a period when Hungary was in the process of formulating new anti-Semitic laws, ran counter to Pope Pius XI's September statement urging Catholics to honour their spiritual father Abraham.[98]

In March 1944, through the papa nuncio yilda Budapesht, Angelo Rotta, the pope urged the Venger government to moderate its treatment of the Jews.[103] The pope also ordered Rotta and other papal legates to hide and shelter Jews.[104] These protests, along with others from the King of Sweden, the International Red Cross, the United States, and Britain led to the cessation of deportations on 8 July 1944.[105] Also in 1944, Pius appealed to 13 Latin American governments to accept "emergency passports", although it also took the intervention of the U.S. State Department for those countries to honor the documents.[106]

Litva

Kardinal davlat kotibi Luigi Maglione received a request from Bosh ravvin ning Falastin Yitzhak HaLevi Herzog in the Spring of 1939 to intercede on behalf of Litva yahudiylari about to be deported to Germany.[103] Pius called Ribbentrop on 11 March, repeatedly protesting against the treatment of Jews. In his 1940 encyclical Summi Pontificatus, Pius rejected anti-semitism, stating that in the Catholic Church there is "neither Gentile nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision".[107] In 1940 Pius asked members of the clergy, on Vatican letterhead, to do whatever they could on behalf of interned Jews.[58]

Nederlandiya

Germaniya bostirib kirgandan keyin Kam mamlakatlar during 1940, Pius XII sent expressions of sympathy to the Queen of the Netherlands, the King of Belgium, and the Grand Duchess of Luxembourg. When Mussolini learned of the warnings and the telegrams of sympathy, he took them as a personal affront and had his ambassador to the Vatican file an official protest, charging that Pius XII had taken sides against Italy's ally Germany. Mussolini's foreign minister claimed that Pius XII was "ready to let himself be deported to a concentration camp, rather than do anything against his conscience".[108]

When Dutch bishops protested against the wartime deportation of Jews in 1942, the Nazis responded with harsher measures rounding up 92 converts including Edit Shteyn who were then deported and murdered. "The brutality of the retaliation made an enormous impression on Pius XII."[109][f]

Slovakiya

In September 1941 Pius objected to a Slovakian Jewish Code,[110] which, unlike the earlier Vichy codes, prohibited intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews.[98]

In 1942, the Slovakian ishlar vakili told Pius that Slovakiya Jews were being sent to concentration camps. On 11 March 1942, several days before the first transport was due to leave, the chargé d'affaires in Bratislava reported to the Vatican: "I have been assured that this atrocious plan is the handwork of ... Prime Minister (Tuka ), who confirmed the plan ... he dared to tell me – he who makes such a show of his Catholicism – that he saw nothing inhuman or un-Christian in it ... the deportation of 80,000 persons to Poland, is equivalent to condemning a great number of them to certain death." The Vatican protested to the Slovak government that it "deplore[s] these ... measures which gravely hurt the natural human rights of persons, merely because of their race".[111]

On 7 April 1943, Monsignor Domeniko Tardini, one of Pius's closest advisors, told Pius that it would be politically advantageous after the war to take steps to help Slovakian Jews.[112]

Alleged silence

Historian Susan Zuccotti argued that "Pius XII, the head of the Roman Catholic Church during the Second World War, did not speak out publicly against the destruction of the Jews. This fact is rarely contested, nor can it be. Evidence of a public protest, if it existed, would be easy to produce. It does not exist."[113][114][115] Ecclesiastical historian William Doino (author of Pius urushi: Pius XII tanqidchilariga javoblar) contests Zuccotti's assertion, and has said that Pius XII was "emphatically not 'silent', and did in fact condemn the Nazis' horrific crimes–through Vatican Radio, his first encyclical, Summi Pontificatus, his major addresses (especially his Christmas allocutions), and the L'Osservatore Romano " and he "intervened, time and time again, for persecuted Jews, particularly during the German occupation of Rome, and was cited and hailed by the Catholic rescuers themselves as their leader and director".[116] Indeed, Pius XII said in the Christmas address that mankind owed a vow "to the hundreds of thousands of persons who, without any fault on their part, sometimes only because of their nationality or race, have been consigned to death or slow extermination."[66]

Yilda Xristianlik tarixi, Maykl Burli yozadi:

For reasons either of personal character or of professional training as a diplomat, his [Pius's] statements were exceedingly cautious and wrapped up in involuted language that is difficult for many to understand, especially in this age of the resonant sound-bite and ubiquitous rent-a-moralist.[117][g]

According to Giovanni Maria Vian of the Vatican Jesuit journal La Civiltà Cattolica the roots of Pius's alleged "silence", what he terms "a black legend", begins in early 1939 with the complaint of the French Catholic intellectual Emmanuel Mounier who questioned the failure of the Pope to censure the Italian aggression of Italy towards Albania and wrote off "the scandal of this silence".[118] He further notes that in 1951 another French Catholic intellectual, Fransua Mauriak, wrote in the introduction to a book by "the Jew Poliakov" that "we never had the comfort of hearing the successor of Galilee, Simon Peter, [i.e Pius XII] use clear and precise words, rather than diplomatic allusions, to condemn the countless crucifixions of the 'brothers of the Lord' [i.e. Jewish people]".[118]

The British representative to the Vatican wrote the following in 1942: "A policy of silence in regard to such offences against the conscience of the world must necessarily involve a renunciation of moral leadership and a consequent atrophy of the influence of the Vatican".[119] Pius himself noted on 3 August 1946 "We condemned on various occasions in the past the persecution that a fanatical anti-Semitism inflicted on the Hebrew people."[120] Garri Uills comments that "this is a deliberate falsehood. He never publicly mentioned the Holocaust."[120][h][men] Michael Phayer notes that with the exception of the "very guarded terms" used in the 1942 Christmas message, Pope Pius did not speak out publicly about the Holocaust.[43][121] Pol Jonson wrote "The Pope gave no guidance. Pius XII advised all Catholic everywhere to fight with valour and charity" and "What made Pius keep silent, apart from natural timidity and fear for the safety of the Vatican itself, was undoubtedly his belief that a total breach between Rome and Hitler would lead to a separatist German Catholic Church."[122][j][k]

Ronald Rychlak notes that Pius was recorded as saying "No doubt a protest would have gained me praise and respect of the civilized world, but it would have submitted the poor Jew to an even worse fate."[123][l] Guenter Lewy notes that some writers have suggested that a public protest by the Pope would only have made things worse for the Jews but comments "Since the condition of the Jews could hardly have become worse, and might have changed for the better, as a result of a papal denunciation, one could ask why the Church did not risk the well being and safety of the Catholics and of the Vatican."[124] Michael Phayer notes Pius XII making similar excuses in 1940 but comments that "This justification cannot be taken seriously."[121][m] It is worth pointing out though, that while European Jews were being exterminated, the Nazis never systematically killed Mischlinge, or people of partial Jewish descent. Frank Coppa wrote: "During World War II as well, Papa Pacelli's diplomatic focus often restricted his moral mission, refusing to openly condemn Nazism's evil actions including its genocide when it appeared it might triumph, but denouncing it as satanic when it was defeated."[32]

Martin Rhonheimer comments "Well-intentioned Catholic apologists continue to produce reports of Church condemnations of Nazism and racism. But these do not really answer the Church's critics. The real problem is not the Church's relationship to National Socialism and racism, but the Church's relationship to the Jews. Here we need what the Church today urges: a 'purification of memory and conscience.' The Catholic Church's undeniable hostility to National Socialism and racism cannot be used to justify its silence about the persecution of the Jews. It is one thing to explain this silence historically and make it understandable. It is quite another to use such explanations for apologetic purposes."[43]

Kardinal Tisserant, a senior member of the Roman Curia wrote to Kardinal Suxard, the Archbishop of Paris, as Nazi forces were overrunning France in June 1940. Tisserant expressed his concern at the racism of the Nazis, the systematic destruction of their victims and the moral reserve of Pope Pius XII: "I'm afraid that history may be obliged in time to come to blame the Holy See for a policy accommodated to its own advantage and little more. And that is extremely sad – above all when one has lived under Pius XI."[125]

Prezident Franklin D. Ruzvelt yuborildi Miron C. Teylor as his special representative to the Vatican in September 1941. His assistant, Harold Tittman, repeatedly pointed out to Pius the dangers to his moral leadership by his failure to speak out against the violations of the natural law carried out by the Nazis.[126] Pius XII responded that he could not name the Nazis without at the same time mentioning the Bolsheviks.[127]

Pius XII also never publicly condemned the Nazi massacre of 1.8–1.9 million mainly Catholic Polish gentiles (including 2,935 members of the Catholic Clergy),[128][129] nor did he ever publicly condemn the Soviet Union for the deaths of over 100,000 mainly Catholic Polish gentile citizens including an untold number of clergy.[130]

In an interview Father Peter Gumpel stated that Robert Kempner's (former U.S. Nuremberg war crimes prosecutor) foreword to Jeno Levai's 1968 book "Hungarian Jewry and the Papacy" asserts that Pope Pius did indeed complain through diplomatic channels about the situation of Hungarian Jews but that any public protestation would have been of no use.[131][132]

Praise from Jewish leaders

Post-war praise by Jewish leaders

Pinchas Lapide, a Jewish theologian and Israeli diplomat to Milan in the 1960s, wrote in Uch papa va yahudiylar that Catholics were "instrumental in saving at least 700,000 but probably as many as 860,000 Jews from certain death at Nazi hands".[133] Some historians have questioned this oft-cited number,[134] which Lapide reached by "deducting all reasonable claims of rescue" by non-Catholics from the number of Jews he claims succeeded in escaping to the free world from Nazi-controlled areas during the Holocaust.[135]

Rabbiyning so'zlariga ko'ra Devid Dalin, in the aftermath of the war, some of the Jewish leaders who hailed Pius XII a righteous gentile for his work in saving thousands of Jews included the scientist Albert Eynshteyn, the Israeli Prime Ministers Golda Meyr va Moshe Sharett, and the Chief Rabbi Yitzhak HaLevi Herzog.[136]

The Chief Rabbi of Rome, Israel Zolli, took refuge in the Vatican following the Nazi occupation of Rome in 1943. Upon the arrival of the Allied Forces in Rome, on June 4, 1944, Israel Zolli resumed the post of Grand Rabbi and in the following July he celebrated a solemn ceremony in the Synagogue, which was broadcast by radio, to publicly express the gratitude of the Jewish community to Pius XII, for the help given to them during the Nazi persecution. Furthermore, on 25 July 1944 he went to the Vatican for an audience to officially thank the pope for what he, personally or through Catholics, had done in favor of the Jews, hosting them or hiding them in convents and monasteries, to save them from the racist hatred of the SS. Fashistlar; thus decreasing the already immense number of victims.[137] After the war he converted to Catholicism and took the name "Eugenio" in honour of Pope Pius XII.

On 21 September 1945, the general secretary of the World Jewish Council, Dr. Leon Kubowitzky, presented an amount of money to the pope, "in recognition of the work of the Holy See in rescuing Jews from Fascist and Nazi persecutions".[138] After the war, in the autumn of 1945, Harry Greenstein from Baltimore, a close friend of Chief Rabbi Herzog of Jerusalem, told Pius how grateful Jews were for all he had done for them. The pope replied, "My only regret is not to have been able to save a greater number of Jews."[139]

Catholic scholar Kevin Madigan interprets such praise from prominent Jewish leaders, including Golda Meyr, as less than sincere; an attempt to secure Vatican recognition of the Isroil davlati.[140]

Tarixnoma

Dastlabki hisoblar

Early literature on the war time leadership of Pius XII was positive, including Halecki and Murray's Pius XII: Eugenio Pacelli, Pope of Peace (1954) and Nazareno Padellaro's Portrait of Pius XII (first published in Italian in 1949). Later, more critical accounts were written.[2]

Pius XII died in October 1958. In 1959 the German bishops issued a series of statements regarding the Holocaust which acknowledged German guilt, in particular that of Catholics and their bishops. Michael Phayer considered it no accident that they waited until Pius's death before speaking out and that all those who had not kept silent were post-war appointees.[141] Davomida Adolf Eyxmann 's much publicized trial in 1960 a question arose relating to the Vatican's knowledge of the Holocaust and if Pope Pius's refusal to speak out was based on fears on what would happen to German Catholics. This sparked public debate in Germany on the relationship of the Church to the Holocaust and Michael Phayer identifies this as when Pius's XII high repute began to wane.[142]

E. W. Bockenforde's article published in the Catholic periodical "Hochland" in 1961 resulted in vehement attacks by many Catholics.[143] In 1962 the historian Friedrich Heer commented that "In 1945 the situation was so critical that only a gigantic attempt at concealment was ... able to save and restore the face of official Christianity in Germany ... I have to confess that all Catholics, from the highest to the lowest – priest, chaplains, laymen (anti-Semitic to this day) – are co-responsible for the mass murder of the Jews."[144]

In 1960 Guenter Lewy began work on his book "The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany", combing the records of the German diocesan, State and party archives, and finally publishing the work in 1964. Though recognising that the Church is hierarchical, it is not immune to the influence of its branches and therefore he does not focus purely on the role of Pius XII.[145][n] Lewy wrote "It is symptomatic of the boldness with which some Catholic writers after 1945 have falsified important documents from the Nazi period."[146][147]

In 1963, Rolf Hochhuth staged his play Vakil (yoki O'rinbosar) which depicted Pius as an antisemite and indifferent to the Holocaust. The depiction was called "unhistorical" and lacking "credible substantiation" by the Britannica entsiklopediyasi. John Cornwell, himself a critic of Pius, described the play as "historical fiction based on scant documentation" and "is so wide of the mark as to be ludicrous".[148][149]

Shoul Fridlender, whose parents were murdered in Auschwitz, published his book Pius XII and the Third Reich amidst the controversy around O'rinbosar, in 1964. It relied heavily on primary sources and concentrated on diplomatic correspondence between the Holy See and Germany.[150][o] Friedländer hoped that the Vatican would open up its own archives and in 1964 Pope Paul VI commissioned a group of Jesuit scholars to edit and publish the Vatican's records. These were published in eleven volumes between 1965 and 1981.[151]

Carlo Falconi published in 1965 "The Silence of the Pope" and followed this with "The Popes of the Twentieth Century" in 1967 in which he criticised Pius XII for "failing to speak out"; "he also was guilty of inadmissible silence about the millions of civilian victims of Nazism – Jews, Poles, Serbs, Russians, gypsies, and others".[152] Falconi was the first to research and publicise the atrocities committed by Croatian Ustashe against Jews and Serbs.[153] Jozef Bottum considers these early attacks, by Lewy, Friedländer, and Falconi, as "more serious and scholarly" and "by today's standards, quite moderate and thoughtful".[154]

O'rinbosar

A rare 1899 handwriting of Eugenio Pacelli with text in Lotin.

1963 yilda, Rolf Xoxxut munozarali drama Der Stellvertreter. Ein christliches Trauerspiel (Deputat, nasroniylarning fojiasi, released in English in 1964) portrayed Pope Pius XII as a hypocrite who remained silent about the Holokost. Books such as Dr. Jozef Lixten "s A Question of Judgment (1963), written in response to O'rinbosar, defended Pius XII's actions during the war. Lichten labelled any criticism of the pope's actions during World War II as "a stupefying paradox" and said, "no one who reads the record of Pius XII's actions on behalf of Jews can subscribe to Hochhuth's accusation".[155] Critical scholarly works like Gyenter Lyusi "s Katolik cherkovi va fashistlar Germaniyasi (1964) also followed the publication of O'rinbosar. Lewy's conclusion was that "the Pope and his advisers—influenced by the long tradition of moderate anti-Semitism so widely accepted in Vatican circles—did not view the plight of the Jews with a real sense of urgency and moral outrage. For this assertion no documentation is possible, but it is a conclusion difficult to avoid."[156] Carlo Falconi (1967) described Hochhuth's depiction as crude and inaccurate, but he does not accept the explanations put forward by apologists of Pius regarding his alleged silence. In particular he rejects the defence of not making things worse by public denunciation since no fate could have been worse than what the Jews were undergoing and that on the one occasion when bishops did speak out against the euthanasia of disabled people the Nazis backed down. He also rejected the defence that the Pope did not know of what was happening since in his opinion this is directly contradicted by instances in which Pius did make diplomatic interventions.[157] In 2002 the play was adapted into the film Omin.

An article on Jesuit Vatican journal La Civiltà Cattolica in March 2009 indicated that the accusations that Hochhut's play made widely known originated not among Jews but in the Communist bloc. It was Moscow Radio, on 2 June 1945, that first direct against Pius XII the accusation of refusing to speak out against the exterminations in Nazi concentration camps. It was also the first to call him "Hitler's Pope".[158] The same journal during the pontificate of Pius was still accusing the Jews of being "Christ killers" and of indulging in ritual murder as late as 1942.[159]

Avvalgi Securitat Umumiy Ion Mixay Patsepa has stated that the play of Hochhuth and numerous publications attacking Pius XII as allegedly having been a Nazi sympathizer were fabrications from the KGB va Sharqiy blok Marksistik secret services leading a campaign to discredit the axloqiy hokimiyat of the Church and Christianity in the West.[160] Pacepa also claims that he was involved in contacting East bloc agents close to the Vatican in order to fabricate the story to be used for the attack against the wartime pope.[160]

Paul VI's defense of Pius

During his 1964 visit to Jordan and Israel, Paul VI passionately spoke out in defense of Pius during his farewell to the Israeli authorities. He said that all know what he accomplished in defense and for the rescue of all those who faced difficulties, with no distinction whatsoever. He added that nothing is more unjust than this outrage against such a venerable figure.[161]

Recent literature

Gitler Papasi va Gitler Papasi haqidagi afsona

In recent decades, the legacy of Pius XII in relation to the Holocaust has been the subject of critical and supportive literature. Kabi mualliflar Jon Kornuell, Garri Uills, Maykl Fayer, Jeyms Kerol, Syuzan Zukkotti va Daniel Goldhagen have written critical assessments, while Jewish historians such as Richard Breitman, Devid Dalin, Martin Gilbert, Pinchas Lapide, Jeno Levai va Michael Tagliacozzo, as well as non-Jewish scholars such as Pierre Blet, Antonio Gaspari, Robert Grem, Piter Gumpel, Margherita Marchione, Maykl O'Karrol, Piertro Palazzini, Kenneth Whitehead, Ralf McInerny, Michael Feldkamp, M. L. T. Brown va Andrea Tornielli have written extensively on the work he did to aid the Jews during the war.[162]

1999 yilda, John Cornwell's bahsli Gitler Papasi was highly critical of Pius, arguing that he had not "done enough", or "spoken out enough" against the Holocaust. Cornwell argued that Pius's entire career as the nuncio to Germany, cardinal secretary of state, and pope was characterized by a desire to increase and centralize the power of the Papacy, and that he subordinated opposition to the Nazis to that goal. He further argued that Pius was antisemitizm va bu pozitsiya uning evropalik yahudiylarga g'amxo'rlik qilishiga to'sqinlik qildi.[163] (Cornwell's views have developed (as noted below), now stating he is unable to judge the Pope's motivation). Baholashda Britannica entsiklopediyasi, Cornwell's depiction of the Pope as antisemitic, lacked "credible substantiation".[2] Kenneth L. Woodward stated in his review in Newsweek that "errors of fact and ignorance of context appear on almost every page".[164]

Cornwell's work was the first to have access to testimonies from Pius's beatification process as well as to many documents from Pacelli's nunciature which had just been opened under the seventy-five year rule by the Vatican State Secretary archives.[165] Cornwell's work was highly controversial. Much praise of Cornwell centered around his disputed claim that he was a practising Catholic who had attempted to absolve Pius with his work.[165]

Syuzan Zukkotti "s Uning Windows ostida: Vatikan va Italiyadagi qirg'in (2000) va Maykl Fayer "s Katolik cherkovi va qirg'in, 1930-1965 (2000) provided further critical, though more scholarly analysis of Pius' legacy.[166]

In 2005, Jesuit historian Vincent Lapomarda yozgan:

Recent works by José M. Sánchez, XII Pius va qirg'in (2001) and Justus George Lawler's Popes and Politics (2002) show how really outrageous are the positions of many of those who have attacked Pope Pius XII. To condemn Pius for not seizing every opportunity to protest the crimes against the Jews overlooks the fact that he could not even save his own priests. What is amazing is that the Catholic Church under the Pope's leadership did far more to help Jews than any other international agency or person ...

— Vincent A. Lapomarda, Iezuitlar va uchinchi reyx[162]

A number of scholars have replied with favourable accounts of the Pius XII, including Margherita Marchione "s Yours Is a Precious Witness: Memoirs of Jews and Catholics in Wartime Italy (1997), Papa Pius XII: Tinchlik me'mori (2000) va Consensus and Controversy: Defending Pope Pius XII (2002); Pierre Blet "s Pius XII and the Second World War, According to the Archives of the Vatican (1999); va Ronald J. Rychlak "s Gitler, urush va Papa (2000).[166] Ecclesiastical historian William Doino, author of Pius urushi: Pius XII tanqidchilariga javoblar, concluded that Pius was "emphatically emas silent".[116]

In specific riposte to Cornwell's moniker, American rabbi and historian, Devid Dalin, nashr etilgan Gitler Papasi haqidagi afsona: Papa Piy XII yahudiylarni fashistlardan qanday qutqargan in 2005 and reaffirmed previous accounts of Pius having been a saviour of thousands of Europe's Jews. In a review of the book, the eminent Holocaust historian and Churchill biographer, Sir Martin Gilbert, wrote that Dalin's work was "an essential contribution to our understanding of the reality of Pope Pius XII's support for Jews at their time of greatest danger. Hopefully, his account will replace the divisively harmful version of papal neglect, and even collaboration, that has held the field for far too long."[12]

Five years after the publication of Gitler Papasi, Cornwell stated: "I would now argue, in the light of the debates and evidence following Gitler Papasi, that Pius XII had so little scope of action that it is impossible to judge the motives for his silence during the war, while Rome was under the heel of Mussolini and later occupied by Germany."[167][168] In 2009 Cornwell wrote of the "fellow travellers" i.e. those priests in Nazi Germany who accepted the benefits that came with the Reyxskonkordat but who failed to condemn the Nazi regime at the same time. U keltiradi Kardinal Pacelli (the future Pope Pius XII) as being an example of a "fellow traveller" who was willing to accept the generosity of Hitler in the educational sphere (more schools, teachers and pupil places), so long as the Church withdrew from the social and political sphere, at the same time as Jews were being dismissed from universities and Jewish pupil places were being reduced. For this he considers Pacelli as effectively being in collusion with the Nazi cause, if not by intent. He further argues that Monsignor Kass, who was involved in negotiations for the Reichskonkordat, and at that time the head of the Roman Catholic Markaz partiyasi, 1933 yil yozida Gitlerga diktatorlik vakolatlarini qo'lga kiritish imkoniyatini berish uchun partiyadoshlarini, Pacellining iqrorligi bilan ishontirdi. Uning ta'kidlashicha, Katolik Markazi partiyasining ovozi Gitler tomonidan diktatorlik vakolatlarini qabul qilishda hal qiluvchi rol o'ynagan va partiyaning keyinchalik tarqatib yuborilishi Pacellining talabiga binoan bo'lgan.[169]

Controversy – "The Pius Wars"

There have been many books published on the subject of Pius XII and the holocaust, often coupled with heated debate, such that it has been described as the "Pius Wars".[154]

Michael Burleigh comments that "Making use of the Holocaust as the biggest moral club to use against the Church, simply because one does not like its policies on abortion, contraception, homosexual priests or the Middle East, is as obscene as any attempt to exploit the deaths of six million European Jews for political purposes."[170][171][p]

A spokesperson for the nineteen Catholic scholars who wrote a letter to Pope Benedict XVI in 2010 asking that the process of sainthood for Pius XII be slowed down, and which asserted that "Pope Pius XII did not issue a clearly worded statement, unconditionally condemning the wholesale slaughter and murder of European Jews", affirmed that "We're all practicing Catholics. We're faithful to the Holy Father."[172]

Joseph Bottum notes Philip Jenkins opinion that criticisms are not really about Pius XII: "Philip Jenkins understands it as not particular to Pius XII at all, but merely a convenient trope by which American commentators express what he calls an entirely new form of anti-Catholicism. Others see it in a continuum of more old-fashioned American distaste for the Whore of Babylon that dwells in Rome, spinning Jesuitical plots."[154][173]

Daniel Goldhagen describes defenders of the Church using Pius XII as a lightning rod to divert peoples attention away from the broader issues, focusing attention on favorable points and concealing others. He further argues that those who use a person's identity as a Jew, Catholic or German as a tool to further their cause betray a great deal about themselves as such tactics are often used to stifle sober debate by switching attention away from the truth as exemplified by the charge of "anti-Catholicism" by apologists.[174][q] Daniel Goldhagen notes Father Peter Gumpel's comments that describes opponents of Pius XII as the "Jewish faction" which has something against Catholics.[175][r]

Garry Wills acknowledges that Pius's response to the Holocaust may have been founded on a sincere, if mistaken, belief that he was doing the correct thing. However, he deprecates arguments "defending Pius with false readings of history" and for "distortions by which the Vatican tries to deny its own sorry story with regard to the Jews. Pius's denial of his own silence, perpetrated by those who must make false claims in order to defend the words of a saint, would make him the source of a new round of deceit structured into past dishonesties."[177]

Xalqaro katolik-yahudiy tarixiy komissiyasi

In 1999, in an attempt to address some of this controversy, the International Catholic-Jewish Historical Commission (Historical Commission), a group of three Catholic and three Jewish scholars was appointed, respectively, by the Holy See's Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews (Holy See's Commission) and the International Jewish Committee for Interreligious Consultations (IJCIC), to whom a preliminary report was issued in October 2000.[178]

The Commission did not discover any documents, but had the agreed-upon task to review the existing Vatican volumes, that make up the Actes et Documents du Saint Siege (ADSS)[179] The Commission was internally divided over the question of access to additional documents from the Holy See, access to the news media by individual commission members, and, questions to be raised in the preliminary report. It was agreed to include all 47 individual questions by the six members, and use them as Preliminary Report.[180] In addition to the 47 questions, the commission issued no findings of its own. It stated that it was not their task to sit in judgement of the Pope and his advisers but to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the papacy during the Holocaust.[181]

The 47 questions by the six scholars were grouped into three parts:

  • (a) 27 specific questions on existing documents,[182] mostly asking for background and additional information such as drafts of the encyclical Mit brennender Sorge, which was largely written by Eugenio Pacelli.[183]
  • (b) Fourteen questions dealt with themes of individual volumes,[184] such as the question how Pius viewed the role of the Church during the war.[185]
  • (c) Six general questions,[186] such as the absence of any anti-communist sentiments in the documents.[187]

The disagreement between members over additional documents locked up under the Holy See's 70 year rule resulted in a discontinuation of the Commission in 2001 on friendly terms.[180] Unsatisfied with the findings, Dr. Michael Marrus, one of the three Jewish members of the Commission, said the commission "ran up against a brick wall. ... It would have been really helpful to have had support from the Holy See on this issue."[188]

Yad Vashem controversy

Da yozuv Yad Vashem ta'kidlaydi Pius XII 's record during the Holocaust was controversial, and that he negotiated a concordat with the Nazis, maintained Vatican neutrality during the war and, formerly stated that he took no initiatives to save Jews.

1985 yilda, Pietro Palazzini was honored by the museum, where he protested the repeated criticisms against Pius, on whose instructions Palazzini declared to have acted. Palazzini, a theological advisor to the Pontiff, had taught and written about the moral theology of Pope Pius XII.[189]

Devid G. Dalin da'vo qilmoqda Gitler Papasi haqidagi afsona that Yad Vashem should honor Pope Pius XII as a "Righteous Gentile", and documents that Pius was praised by all the leading Jews of his day for his role in saving more Jews than Oskar Shindler.

Devid Rozen has taken exception to the caption, stating when Pius died both Moshe Sharett va Golda Meyr sent telegrams stating that when darkness reigned over Europe, he was one of the few who raised his voice in protest. "What Yad Vashem says is not necessarily wrong," conceded Rosen, "but it doesn't give us all the information." Rabbi Rosen later quoted historian Martin Gilbert, who says that Pius saved thousands of Jews.[190]

In light of recent developments and research, on 1 July 2012, Yad Vashem changed the inscription to note a "considerable number of secret rescue activities" by the Church.[191] Whereas the old text claimed the Pope "did not intervene" in the deportation of Jews from Rome, the new inscription says that he "did not publicly protest".[192] The display also added text from Pius' Christmas 1942 radio speech in which he speaks of "hundreds of thousands of persons who, without any fault on their part", were killed, but it also points out that he did not specifically name the Jews.[193] The new wording also removed the former claim that Concordat was signed "even at the price of recognizing the Nazi regime".[194] Yad Vashem indicated that the new inscription is due to "research that has been done in the recent years and presents a more complex picture than previously presented",[191] including in part the opening of the Pope's archives.[192]

Biz eslaymiz: Shoa haqidagi mulohaza

2000 yilda, Papa Ioann Pavel II, on behalf of all people, apologized to Jews by inserting a prayer at the G'arbiy devor that read "We're deeply saddened by the behavior of those in the course of history who have caused the children of God to suffer, and asking your forgiveness, we wish to commit ourselves to genuine brotherhood with the people of the Covenant."[195]

This papal apology, one of many issued by Pope John Paul II for past human and Church failings throughout history, was especially significant because John Paul II emphasized Church guilt for, and the Second Vatican Council's condemnation of, anti-Semitism.[196] The papal letter Biz eslaymiz: Shoa haqidagi mulohaza urged Catholics to repent "of past errors and infidelities" and "renew the awareness of the Hebrew roots of their faith".[196][197]

Developments since 2008

A special conference of scholars on Pius XII on the 50th anniversary of his death was held in Rome on 15–17 September 2008, by Pave the Way Foundation.[198] Papa Benedikt XVI held a reception for the conference participants on 19 September 2008 where he praised Pius XII as a pope who made every effort to save Jews during the war.[199] A second conference was held on 6–8 November 2008 by the Hayot uchun Pontifik akademiyasi.[200]

On 9 October 2008, the 50th anniversary of Pius XII's death, Benedikt XVI celebrated pontifical mass in his memory. Shortly prior to, and after the mass, dialectics continued between some Jewish religious leaders and the Vatican as Rabbi Shear Yeshuv Cohen of Haifa addressed the Synod of Bishops and expressed his disappointment towards Pius XII's "silence" during the war.[201]

The CRIF, an organization which represent Jews in France, has opposed the beatification of Pius XII.[202]

In a self-penned article in the Nyu-York Daily News, Gary Krupp of the "Yo'lni poydevor" u va boshqa tadqiqotchilar Pacellining kariyerasining boshidanoq unchalik noma'lum bo'lgan faoliyatini batafsil bayon etgan ko'plab hujjatlarni qanday topganini va keyinchalik u Piyusda yahudiylarga yordam berganligini va "bizning tarixchilarimiz" ushbu akademik beparvolikni tuzatish vaqti kelganini va ochiq arxivlarni halollik bilan o'rganing ". U shuningdek, "Biz Piusni qilgan ishi uchun tanqid qilishdan ko'ra, aslida nima qilganini tan olishimiz kerak. Papa Piyni butun dunyo rahbarlari birlashtirgandan ko'ra ko'proq yahudiylarning hayotini saqlab qolgan jasoratli harakatlari uchun maqtash kerak" deb yozgan.[203]

Papa Piy XII tarixiy yozuvlari bilan bog'liq "Pave the Way Foundation" metodologiyasiga bo'ysungan qattiq tanqid ko'plab olimlardan va uzoq yillar tashkil etilgan yahudiy tashkilotlaridan.[204] Professor Dwork, Xolokost tarixi bo'yicha Rose professori va Klark universiteti qoshidagi Strassler xolokost va genotsidni o'rganish markazi direktori janob Kruppning tadqiqotlari "havaskor, havaskorlardan ham yomoni - xavfli" va "U yaxshi niyatli bo'lishi mumkin, ammo uning xalqaro aloqalar va tarixiy tadqiqotlar bo'yicha tajribaning etishmasligi janob Kruppni Vatikan ichidagi fraksiyalar tomonidan boshqarishda juda zaif qiladi. "[204]

2010 yil fevral oyida o'n to'qqizta katolik ilohiyotshunosligi va tarixshunos olimlari Papa Benedikt XVIdan Papa Pius XII ning avliyolik jarayonini sekinlashtirishini so'radilar. Olimlarning aytishicha, mavjud tadqiqotlar bizni "Papa Piy XII yevropalik yahudiylarning ulgurji qatl etilishi va o'ldirilishini shartsiz qoralagan holda aniq bayon qilingan bayonot chiqarmadi" degan fikrga olib keladi "va" Shu bilan birga, ba'zi dalillar ham bizni Piusni ko'rishga majbur qiladi XII diplomatik kelib chiqishi uni neytral davlat - Vatikan boshlig'i sifatida yahudiylarga urush paytida ommaga ma'lum bo'lmagan vositalar yordamida yordam berishga undaydi. Ikkala savolni ham hal qilish uchun qo'shimcha tadqiqotlar olib borish zarur "; Bundan tashqari, "Ishonchsizlik va qo'rquv hali ham mavjud", chunki "XII Pius ko'plab yahudiylar va katoliklar uchun o'zining tarixiy papachiligidan ancha katta rol o'ynaydi. Aslida XII Pius ko'p asrlik nasroniylarga qarshi yahudiylik va antiqodizmning ramzi bo'lib qoldi. -Semitizm. "[172]

2012 yil 1 iyulda Yad Vashem Pius haqidagi yozuvni tanqidini yumshatish va Vatikan tomonidan qutqarish harakatlarini tan olish uchun o'zgartirdi.[191] Yad Vashemning ta'kidlashicha, yangi yozuv "so'nggi yillarda olib borilgan tadqiqotlar va ilgari taqdim etilganidan ko'ra murakkabroq rasmni taqdim etadi".[191]

Shuningdek qarang

Izohlar

  1. ^ "Papa Legeyt Pakelli Kongressning yuqori diniy tekisligidan tushmasdan katoliklik dushmanlari" jangari xudosizlarning serdaromad qatori haqida aniqroq gapirib, anti-Masihning mushtini silkitib qo'ydi ". U xitob qildi:" Hozir Hirod va Pilat, Neron va Diokletian, Murtiy Yulian va Birinchi asrning barcha ta'qibchilari? " Sent-Ambruz shunday javob beradi: "Qirg'in qilingan nasroniylar g'alaba qozonishdi; mag'lub bo'lganlar ularning ta'qibchilari edi". Kul va chang - bu nasroniylikning dushmanlari; kul va chang ular xohlagan barcha narsalardir, ehtimol ular quvvati va quruqlikdagi shon-shuhratining qisqa lahzasini tatib ko'rishgan ". Time jurnali, 1938 yil 6-iyun
  2. ^ "Endi Fisih bayrami tayyorlanayotgan kun edi; taxminan oltinchi soat edi. U yahudiylarga:" Mana sizning Shohingiz! "- dedi. Ular qichqirib yuborishdi: 'Yo'q qiling, yo'q qiling, uni xochga mixlang!'" Yuhanno 19: 14-19: 15
  3. ^ Zamonaviy venger episkopi, qirg'in yahudiylar uchun munosib jazo ekanligini da'vo qildi. Qarang Fridlender (2007), p. Eger arxiyepiskopining takliflari uchun 620.
  4. ^ 16 martda, taxtga o'tirgandan to'rt kun o'tgach, Gundlax LaFargega xabar berishicha, Pius XI o'limidan bir oz oldin berilgan, ammo yangi Rim papasida bu haqda bilish uchun hozircha hech qanday imkoniyat yo'q edi. (Passelecq & Suchecky (1998), p. 126)
  5. ^ M. Biffi, Monsda. Sezare Orsenigo, 241-bet, 43-yozuv, Orsenigo ushbu voqeani birinchi bo'lib professor E.Senatraga yuz berganidan bir necha kun o'tgach aytganini aytadi. A.Rods "Diktatorlar davrida Vatikanda", 1922-1945, 343-bet. Bu haqda Petrus Blattda, 1963 yil 7 aprelda va "Documentation Catholique" da keltirilgan, 1963 yil 18 avgustda qayd etilgan.
  6. ^ Gitler cherkovga qarshi kurashni kuchaytirganda, Piyus dunyoni hayratda qoldirgan qat'iyatlilik bilan qarshi chiqdi. Uning ensiklopediyasi Mit Brenneder Sorge "natsizmga qarshi chiqish va uni tanqid qilishga jur'at etgan birinchi buyuk rasmiy ommaviy hujjat" va "Vatikan tomonidan chiqarilgan eng buyuk bunday hukmlardan biri" edi. Kontrabanda yo'li bilan Germaniyaga, 1937 yil mart oyida Palm yakshanba kuni barcha katolik minbarlaridan o'qilgan. Bu xatolarni fosh qilgan va qon va tuproq haqidagi fashistlarning afsonalarini qoralagan; u o'zining neopaganizmini, cherkovga qarshi yo'q qilish urushini rad etdi va hatto Fyurerning o'zini "jirkanch takabburlikka ega jinni payg'ambar" deb ta'rifladi. Natsistlar g'azablandilar va qasos sifatida uni bosib chiqargan barcha matbuotni yopdilar va muhrladilar va cherkovga qarshi ko'plab qasos choralarini ko'rdilar, shu jumladan katolik ruhoniylarining axloqsiz sudlarini uzoq vaqt davomida o'tkazdilar. (Bokenkotter (2004), 389-392 betlar)
  7. ^ Pol Jonson "Keyinchalik u [Pius XII] o'zining dastlabki urush bayonotlarini ikkala tomon ham ularni foydasiga deb talqin qilgan deb da'vo qilib himoya qildi. Bunday holda ularni chiqarishda nima maqsad bor edi?" Deb yozgan edi. (Jonson (1976), p. 490)
  8. ^ Katoliklarni Piusning Gitler rejimiga qarshi "chin dildan" deb noto'g'riligi uning 1945 yildagi Fulda bayonotida nemis yepiskoplarining jamoaviy aybni rad etishini to'liq qabul qilganligini namoyish etdi. (Phayer (2000), p. 161)
  9. ^ Yahudiylarga yordam bermaslik haqida ijobiy niyat bor edi, deyish, albatta, uzoqdan ham haqiqat emas. Cherkov yahudiylarni ataylab fashist jallodlariga topshirgan deb da'vo qilish yolg'on, haqiqatan ham tuhmat bo'lar edi. Hech kim hech bo'lmaganda Muqaddas Taxt tomonidan yahudiylarga yordam berish istagi yo'qligini da'vo qila olmaydi.[43]
  10. ^ 1942 yil boshida Piyus amerikalik diplomat Tittmanga gapira olmasligini aytdi, chunki "nemis xalqi mag'lubiyatining achchig'ida, keyinchalik uni bu mag'lubiyatga bilvosita bo'lsa ham hissa qo'shganligi uchun tanbeh beradi". Fayer buni nemislarning Rim Papasiga nisbatan millionlab o'ldirilgan yahudiylarga nisbatan tashvishini keltirib chiqaradigan taxmin qilingan buzilgan standart deb hisoblaydi. Kardinal Tardinining ta'kidlashicha, "Piyus temperamentiga ko'ra yumshoq va juda uyatchan edi. U jangchi bo'lmadi". (Phayer (2008), p. ix)
  11. ^ Qarang Phayer (2000), p. 101 yahudiylarni yo'q qilish bilan taqqoslaganda, Rimning ehtimoliy bombardimonidan Piusning xavotiri.
  12. ^ Piyus Robert Leyberga u yahudiylarning o'ldirilishi haqida gapirmaganini aytdi, chunki u urush oxirida potentsial tinchlikparvar sifatida o'z pozitsiyasini buzishni xohlamadi. (Phayer (2000), p. 57)
  13. ^ Fayer shuningdek, Piyus yahudiy millatiga mansub katoliklarning o'ldirilganini eshitgandan keyin sukut yo'lini tanladi, 1942 yildagi arxiyepiskop de Yongning noroziligi sababli, u katoliklar qirg'in qilgan xorvat genotsidiga qarshi indamaganligi sababli apologlarning da'volarini rad etadi. Yahudiylar va serblar va boshqa epizodlar. (Phayer (2000), 44-45 betlar)
  14. ^ Lyu Piusning gapirishlari vaziyatni yanada yomonlashtirishi mumkin deb hisoblaydi, ammo "yomonroq holatlarning oldini olish uchun yo'l qo'yilgan jinoyat oldida jimlik haqida hech qanday kassuistlik uni izlashning mashaqqatli vazifasini engillashtirmaydi. Axloqiy holatlar mavjud ayb aybsizlikka uchraydi. Sukutning chegarasi bor. " (Kornuell (1999), p. 377)
  15. ^ Fridlender "suveren-pontifik Germaniyaga moyil bo'lib tuyuldi, u fashistlar rejimining tabiati bilan kamaymaganga o'xshaydi va 1944 yilgacha inkor qilingan edi" degan xulosaga keldi. (Kornuell (1999), p. 376)
  16. ^ Ralf MakInerniy ham buni cherkovning abortga qarshi turishidan zamonaviy nafrat bilan bog'ladi; Devid Dalin bu papa hokimiyati kelajagi uchun katolik ichidagi kurash ekanligini va Holokost shunchaki vosita sifatida ishlatilishini ta'kidladi.[154]
  17. ^ Shuningdek qarang Goldhagen (2002), 393-423 bet, Goldhagenning Pius va cherkov himoyachilari unga qanday hujum qilgani haqidagi fikrini kengaytirilgan tahlil qilish uchun.
  18. ^ Gumpel o'zining yahudiy do'stlari ko'p bo'lganligi va uning sharhlari umuman yahudiylarga qaratilgan emasligini aytdi, ammo "Ba'zi yahudiylar katolik cherkoviga katta zarar etkazishdi" deb ta'kidladilar. Avstriyalik nasroniy-yahudiylarning muloqotlar guruhi rahbari Gerxard Bodendorfer ota Gumpelning izohlari "antisemitizmning eng past tortmasidan chiqqaniga" norozilik bildirdi.[176]

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ Gilbert, Martin (2001). "Yakuniy echim". Aziz, Yan; Oyoq, Richard D. (tahr.). Ikkinchi jahon urushining Oksford sherigi. Oksford, Buyuk Britaniya: Oksford universiteti matbuoti. 285–292 betlar. ISBN  0-19-280670-X.
  2. ^ a b v Coppa, Frank J. (2006 yil 29 iyun). "XII Pius: baholash". Britannica entsiklopediyasi.
  3. ^ "Rim katolikligi: jahon urushlari davri". Britannica entsiklopediyasi. 2016 yil 17-fevral.
  4. ^ Bogle, Jeyms (1996 yil 31 mart). "Piy XII va yahudiylarning haqiqiy hikoyasi". Katolik ligasi.
  5. ^ "860 ming kishi hayotini saqlab qoldi - XII Piyus va yahudiylar haqidagi haqiqat". Katolik oilalarining milliy assotsiatsiyasi. 1991 yil kuz.
  6. ^ Lapid, Pinchas, 1922- (1967). So'nggi uchta papa va yahudiylar. Yodgorlik matbuoti. OCLC  930453101.CS1 maint: bir nechta ism: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  7. ^ Dalin, Devid G. (2005). Gitler Papasi haqidagi afsona: Papa Piy XII yahudiylarni fashistlardan qanday qutqargan. Regnery Publ. ISBN  0-89526-034-4. OCLC  266029457.
  8. ^ Netton, Yan Richard (2006). Islom, nasroniylik va urf-odat: qiyosiy izlanish. Edinburg universiteti matbuoti. p. 113. ISBN  978-0-748-63025-7.
  9. ^ a b Gorkiy, Jonatan. "XII Pius va qirg'in" (PDF). Yad vashem.
  10. ^ a b "XI Pius". Britannica entsiklopediyasi. 16 mart 2007 yil.
  11. ^ Soucy, Robert (2009 yil 6-noyabr). "Fashizm". Britannica entsiklopediyasi.
  12. ^ a b v d e Gilbert, Martin (2006 yil 18-avgust). "Gitler papasi?". Amerikalik tomoshabin.
  13. ^ Coppa, Frank J. (2006 yil 29 iyun). "XII Pius: Ikkinchi Jahon urushi va qirg'in". Britannica entsiklopediyasi.
  14. ^ a b v Coppa, Frank J. (2006 yil 29 iyun). "XII Pius: erta hayot va martaba". Britannica entsiklopediyasi.
  15. ^ Phayer (2000), p. 5 iqtibos keltirgan holda Herkzl, Moshe Y. (1993). Djoel Lerner (tahrir). Xristianlik va Vengriya yahudiylarining qirg'inlari. NYU Press. p. 94. ISBN  978-0-8147-3520-6.
  16. ^ Phayer (2008), p. 116.
  17. ^ a b v d Richlak, Ronald J .; Doino, Uilyam, kichik (16 sentyabr 2010). "XII Pius va buzuvchi Ellipsis". Birinchi narsalar.CS1 maint: ref = harv (havola)
  18. ^ a b Wilenskiy, Gabriel. "Papa Piy XII yahudiylarning kontseptsiyasi va Vengriya yahudiylarining deportatsiyasi". Olti million xochga mixlash.
  19. ^ Vasiyatnoma (2000), 37-38 betlar.
  20. ^ Kertzer (2002), 278–279-betlar.
  21. ^ O'Shea, Pol (2011 yil 18-iyul). "Uilyam Doino, yahudiylar va Piy XII. Xuddi shu narsa".. Blogspot.co.uk.
  22. ^ Teylor, Fred (1982). Gebbels kundaliklari, 1939-1941 yillar. X. Xemilton. ISBN  978-0-241-10893-2.
  23. ^ a b "Vatikan fayllari". Franklin D. Ruzvelt nomidagi Prezident kutubxonasi va muzeyi.
  24. ^ "XII Piusga FDR maktubi". Franklin D. Ruzvelt nomidagi Prezident kutubxonasi va muzeyi. 1940 yil 14-fevral.
  25. ^ Dalin (2005), p. 70.
  26. ^ a b Gutman (1990), p. 1136.
  27. ^ Kamroq, Jeffri (1995). Kiruvchi narsalarni kutib olish: Braziliya va yahudiylar savoli. Kaliforniya universiteti matbuoti. 151–168 betlar. ISBN  978-0-520-91434-6.
  28. ^ a b Pius XII (1939).
  29. ^ a b Pius XII (1939), paragraf. 106.
  30. ^ a b Pius XII (1939), paragraf. 6 va 7.
  31. ^ Kornuell (1999), 233–244 betlar.
  32. ^ a b Coppa, Frank J. (2008). "Axloq va diplomatiya o'rtasida: Holokost paytida Vatikanning" sukunati "". Cherkov va davlat jurnali. 50 (3): 541–568. doi:10.1093 / jcs / 50.3.541.
  33. ^ Lewy (1964), p. 245.
  34. ^ Kornuell (1999), p. 234.
  35. ^ Lewy (1964), p. 245, Gestapo Myunxen buyrug'iga asoslanib, 1939 yil 7-noyabr, Vashington, NA, T-175, 250-rulon, 2741860-gachasi ramka.
  36. ^ Lewy (1964), p. 306.
  37. ^ Falconi (1970), 17-18 betlar.
  38. ^ Fridlender (2007), p. 74.
  39. ^ Zukkotti (2000), 63-64-betlar.
  40. ^ Chadvik (1988), p. 85.
  41. ^ Pius XII (1939), paragraf. 48.
  42. ^ Rychlak (2000), p. 274.
  43. ^ a b v d e Rhongeymer, Martin (2003 yil noyabr). "Holokost: nima aytilmagan". Birinchi narsalar.
  44. ^ Phayer (2008), p. 6.
  45. ^ Falconi, Karlo (1968). Yigirmanchi asrda Papa: X Piyodan Yuhanno XXIII. Vaydenfeld va Nikolson. p. 259.
  46. ^ Phayer (2000), p. 3.
  47. ^ Bussmann, Valter (1969). "Pius XII an die deutschen Bischöfe" [XII Pius nemis episkoplariga]. Xochland (nemis tilida). Vol. 61. 61-65 betlar.
  48. ^ Passelecq & Suchecky (1998), 113-137 betlar.
  49. ^ a b Hill, Roland (1997 yil 8-noyabr). "Yo'qotilgan entsiklik". Tabletka. p. 10. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2016 yil 16 sentyabrda.
  50. ^ Passelecq & Suchecky (1998), p. 121 2.
  51. ^ "Nostra Aetate: katolik-yahudiy munosabatlarini o'zgartirish". Tuhmatga qarshi liga. 20 oktyabr 2005. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2016 yil 17 sentyabrda.
  52. ^ Hoffmann (1996), 161, 294-betlar.
  53. ^ Hoffmann (1996), p. 160.
  54. ^ Shirer (1960), p. 716.
  55. ^ Xebbletvayt, Butrus (1993). Pol VI: Birinchi zamonaviy papa. Paulist Press. p.143. ISBN  978-0-8091-0461-1.
  56. ^ Shirer (1960), p. 750.
  57. ^ Fest, Yoaxim S. (1997). Gitlerning o'limini rejalashtirish: Germaniyaning Gitlerga qarshilik ko'rsatishi, 1933-1945. Feniks. p. 131. ISBN  978-0-7538-0040-9.
  58. ^ a b Ewers, Jastin (2008 yil 14-noyabr). Katolik-yahudiy qarama-qarshiliklari Papa Pius XII uchun avliyolik yo'lini sekinlashtirmoqda. AQSh yangiliklari va dunyo hisoboti.
  59. ^ "Discorso di Sua Santita Pio XII al Sacro Collegio alla Vigilia del Santo Natale" [Rojdestvo arafasida Muqaddas kollejga Xiyam XII Piyusning manzili]. Papa XII Piyning nutqlari va radio xabarlari, pontifikaning to'rtinchi yili, 1942 yil 2 mart - 1943 yil 1 mart (italyan tilida). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 24 dekabr 1942. 319-323 betlar.
  60. ^ Knopp, Gvido (2000). Gitlerning xolokosti. Satton. p. 250. ISBN  978-0-7509-2700-0.
  61. ^ Trevor Flek. Yana hech qachon: Xolokost munosabati bilan katolik-yahudiy munosabatlarini tekshirish[doimiy o'lik havola ]. JUPS katta dissertatsiyasi, Jorjtaun universiteti, 2006 yil 1 aprel. Kirish 30 Noyabr 2012.
  62. ^ Phayer (2000), 27-28 betlar.
  63. ^ "Diplomatik yozishmalar: AQSh elchisi Miron Teylor Kardinal Maglionga". FDR Prezident kutubxonasi va muzeyi. 1942 yil 26-sentyabr.
  64. ^ "Diplomatik yozishmalar: AQSh davlat kotibining muovini Summner Uels Vatikan elchisi Miron Teylorga". FDR Prezident kutubxonasi va muzeyi. 21 oktyabr 1942 yil.
  65. ^ Hilberg, Raul (2003). Evropa yahudiylarining yo'q qilinishi. Men (3-nashr). Yel universiteti matbuoti. p. 315. ISBN  978-0-300-09557-9.
  66. ^ a b Lopez, Angelo (2008 yil 18-noyabr). "Papa Piy XI, Papa Piy XII va Gitlerning yahudiylarga qarshi qonunlariga ikki xil javob". Kundalik fuqaro. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2016 yil 14 sentyabrda.
  67. ^ Ciano, Galeazzo (2004). Diarios, 1937-1943. Grupo Planeta (GBS). ISBN  978-84-8432-504-8.
  68. ^ 1943 yil 30 aprelda XII Piyusning Berlin yepiskopi Graf fon Preysinga yozgan xati, 1964 yil 2 fevraldagi "Documentation catholique" da nashr etilgan.
  69. ^ Phayer (2008), 253-254 betlar.
  70. ^ McInerny (2001).
  71. ^ Xaberman, Klayd (1991 yil 21-iyul). "Jurnal Gitlerning Papani o'g'irlashni rejalashtirganini aytmoqda". The New York Times.
  72. ^ O'Brayen, Nensi Frazier (2007 yil 1-iyun). "Yangi kitobda Gitler natsist generali tomonidan fosh qilingan papani o'g'irlash rejasi haqida". Katolik yangiliklar xizmati. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007 yil 6-iyunda.
  73. ^ Kurzman, Dan (2007 yil 1-iyun). "Gitlerning Papani o'g'irlash rejasi". Katolik ligasi. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007 yil 11 oktyabrda.
  74. ^ a b Skvayrlar, Nik; Kolduell, Saymon (2009 yil 22 aprel). "Agar fashistlar urush davridagi Papani qo'lga olsalar, Vatikan Portugaliyaga ko'chib o'tishni rejalashtirgan". Daily Telegraph.
  75. ^ "Papa fashistlar tomonidan qo'lga olinsa, ishdan bo'shagan bo'lar edi". Christian Today. 2009 yil 22 aprel.
  76. ^ Chadvik (1988), p. 275.
  77. ^ Alvares, Devid; Grem, Robert A., SJ (2013 yil 5-noyabr). Hech narsa muqaddas emas: 1939-1945 yillarda fashistlarning Vatikanga qarshi josusligi. 1997. p. 87. ISBN  978-1-135-21721-1.
  78. ^ Lixten (1963), p. 120.
  79. ^ Sanches, Xose M. (2002). XII Pius va qirg'in: Qarama-qarshilikni tushunish. Amerika katolik universiteti matbuoti. p.142. ISBN  978-0813210810.
  80. ^ Gallo, Patrik J. (2006). "Dahshatli jinoyatni to'xtatish uchun". Galloda Patrik J. (tahrir). XII Pius, Holokost va Revizionistlar: Insholar. Jefferson, N.C .: McFarland & Company. ISBN  9780786480661.
  81. ^ Sir Martin Gilbert, Solih, Nyu-York, Genri Xolt, 2003, p. 365
  82. ^ Rychlak (2000), p. 212.
  83. ^ D'Hippolito, Jozef (2004 yil 20-avgust). "Papa Ioann XXIII va yahudiylar". Xalqaro Raul Wallenberg jamg'armasi.
  84. ^ Phayer, Maykl (2000). Katolik cherkovi va qirg'in, 1930-1965 yillar. Indiana universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  9780253214713.
  85. ^ Lang, Berel (2001 yil kuz). ""Etarli emas "va" mo'l-ko'l ": XII Piyus nima qildi?". Yahudiylik: Yahudiylarning hayoti va tafakkurining har choraklik jurnali. 50 (4): 448–452.
  86. ^ Grem, Robert A. "Vatikan va Xolokost: 860 ming hayot saqlanib qoldi - XII Piyus va yahudiylar to'g'risida haqiqat". Yahudiylarning virtual kutubxonasi.
  87. ^ "Eyxmanning kundaligi katolik cherkovining yahudiylarga yordamini ochib beradi". EWTN. "Zenit". 2000 yil 1 mart.
  88. ^ Zukkotti (2000), p. 307.
  89. ^ Lewy (1964), p. 301.
  90. ^ a b Kurth, Jeyms (2002 yil yoz). "Papa Pius XIIga tuhmat qilish" (PDF). Zamonaviy asr. Kollejlararo tadqiqotlar instituti. 44 (3): 283–287.
  91. ^ Baglioni, Pina (2006 yil avgust). "Muqaddas Ota buyuradi ...". 30 kun. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007 yil 27 sentyabrda. Olingan 3 iyul 2009.
  92. ^ Devies, Bess Tviston (2006 yil 19-avgust). "Iymon yangiliklari - Izoh - Times Online". The Times. Olingan 2 noyabr 2006.[o'lik havola ]
  93. ^ Rot va Ritner, 2002, p. 44.[to'liq iqtibos kerak ]
  94. ^ Rot va Ritner, 2002, p. 236.[to'liq iqtibos kerak ]
  95. ^ "Yangiliklar, 1944 yil 28-avgust". Truman kutubxonasi. 1944 yil 29-avgust.
  96. ^ Phayer (2000), p. 37.
  97. ^ a b Perl (1989), p. 200.
  98. ^ a b v Phayer (2000), p. 5.
  99. ^ Marrus, Maykl Robert; Pakton, Robert O. (1981). Vichi Frantsiya va yahudiylar. Stenford universiteti matbuoti. p. 202. ISBN  978-0-8047-2499-9.
  100. ^ Delpech, F. (1982). "Les Eglises et la Persécution raciale". Yilda Xavier de Montclos (tahrir). Eglises et chrétiens dans la IIe Guerre mondiale: La France; actes du colloque national tenu à Lion du 27 avu 30 January, 1978, sous la direction de Xavier de Montclos [va boshq. (frantsuz tilida). Universitaires de Lion-ni bosadi. p. 267. ISBN  978-2-7297-0121-5.
  101. ^ Dalin (2005), p. 74.
  102. ^ Perl (1989), p. 206.
  103. ^ a b Gutman (1990), p. 1138.
  104. ^ Dalin (2005), 87-89-betlar.
  105. ^ Gilbert (1987), p. 701.
  106. ^ Perl (1989), p. 176.
  107. ^ Dalin (2005), p. 73.
  108. ^ Dalin (2005), p. 76.
  109. ^ Vidmar, Jon (2005). Asrlar davomida katolik cherkovi: tarix. Paulist Press. ISBN  978-1-61643-215-7.
  110. ^ Morley, Jon F. (1980). Vatikan diplomatiyasi va yahudiylar Xolokost paytida, 1939-1943. KTAV nashriyoti. p.75. ISBN  978-0-87068-701-3.
  111. ^ Lapide (1967), p. 139.
  112. ^ Blet, Per; Grem, Robert A.; Martini, Anjelo; Shnayder, Burxart, nashr. (1943 yil 7-aprel). Sankt-Sièga oid hujjatlar va hujjatlar Seconde Guerre mondiale (Hisobot).
  113. ^ Zukkotti (2000), p. 1.
  114. ^ Falconi (1970), 39-40, 75-betlar.
  115. ^ Phayer (2000), p. xv.
  116. ^ a b Pentin, Edvard (2012 yil 23-noyabr). "Londonda Pius XII bahsida uchqunlar uchmoqda". Katolik Herald.
  117. ^ Burli (2006), p. 283.
  118. ^ a b Magister, Sandro (2005 yil 20-iyun). "XII Piyning qora afsonasini katolik ixtiro qilgan: Mounier". Chiesa Press.
  119. ^ Burli (2006), p. 255.
  120. ^ a b Vasiyatnoma (2000), p. 66.
  121. ^ a b Phayer (2000), p. 54.
  122. ^ Jonson (1976), p. 492.
  123. ^ Rychlak (2000), p. 270.
  124. ^ Lewy (1964), p. 304.
  125. ^ Kent, Piter C. (oktyabr 1988). "Ikki papa haqida ertak: XI Piy, XII Piy va Rim-Berlin o'qi". Zamonaviy tarix jurnali. 23 (4): 589–608. doi:10.1177/002200948802300405. JSTOR  260836. S2CID  159812206.
  126. ^ Coppa, Frank J. (1999). Ziddiyatli kelishuvlar: Vatikanning Napoleon, Mussolini va Gitler bilan munosabatlari. CUA Press. p.175. ISBN  978-0-8132-0920-3.
  127. ^ Hilberg, Raul (2003). Evropa yahudiylarining yo'q qilinishi. III (3-nashr). Yel universiteti matbuoti. 1204-1205 betlar. ISBN  978-0-300-09592-0.
  128. ^ "Polshalik qurbonlar". Holokost Entsiklopediyasi. Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari Holokost yodgorlik muzeyi. 2016 yil 2-iyul..
  129. ^ Craughwell, Thomas J (1998 yil yoz). "G'ayriyahudiy qirg'in". Katolik madaniyati.
  130. ^ Piotrovskiy, Tadeush (1998). Polsha Xolokosti: etnik ziddiyat, ikkinchi respublikada ishg'ol etuvchi kuchlar bilan hamkorlik va genotsid, 1918-1947. McFarland. p. 20. ISBN  978-0-7864-2913-4.
  131. ^ Gumpel, Piter (1999 yil dekabr). "Kornuellning XII Piusdagi arzon zarbasi". Inqiroz jurnali. Vol. 17 yo'q. 11. 19-25 betlar.
  132. ^ "Jahon matbuoti Pius XII-ni yomonlashda xatoliklarni ochib berdi". EWTN. 1999 yil 3 oktyabr.
  133. ^ Lapide (1967) keltirilgan Dalin (2005), p. 11
  134. ^ Gilbert (1987), p. 623.
  135. ^ Lapide (1967), p. 269.
  136. ^ Dalin, Devid, Rabbi (2001 yil 26-fevral). "Odil G'ayriyahudiy: Papa Piy XII va yahudiylar". Katolik ligasi.
  137. ^ "Pio XII ed il" Trio Lescano"". 5.135.223.179. Olingan 7 sentyabr 2020.
  138. ^ McInerny (2001), p. 155.
  139. ^ McInerny (2001), p. 152.
  140. ^ Madigan, Kevin (2001 yil 14 mart). "XII Piusga hukm qilish, Papa nima qilmagan". Xristian asr. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2016 yil 17 sentyabrda. Olingan 8 sentyabr 2016.
  141. ^ Phayer (2000), p. 200.
  142. ^ Phayer (2000), p. 201.
  143. ^ Lewy (1964), xi, xiv.
  144. ^ Lapide (1967), p. 241.
  145. ^ Lewy (1964), xi-xiii.
  146. ^ Lewy (1964), 353-354 betlar, fn. 47.
  147. ^ Lewy (1964), p. 276, "tarixni soxtalashtirish" ning yana bir misoli uchun.
  148. ^ Kornuell (1999), p. 375.
  149. ^ Falconi (1967), p. 257, Piusning tasvirini qo'pol va noto'g'ri deb tasvirlaydi.
  150. ^ Kornuell (1999), 375-376-betlar.
  151. ^ Kornuell (1999), p. 376.
  152. ^ Falconi (1967), p. 257.
  153. ^ Kornuell (1999), 377-388 betlar.
  154. ^ a b v d Bottum, Jozef (2004 yil aprel). "Pius urushlarining oxiri". Birinchi narsalar.
  155. ^ Lixten (1963), p. 31.
  156. ^ Marchione, Margherita (2000). Papa Pius XII: Tinchlik me'mori. Paulist Press. pp.16 –17. ISBN  978-0-8091-3912-5.
  157. ^ Falconi (1967), 256-257, 261-betlar.
  158. ^ Sotish, Jovanni (2006). Il Novecento tra genocidi, paure e speranze. Editoriale Jaca kitobi. p. 214. ISBN  978-88-16-40753-4.
  159. ^ Phayer (2000), p. 8.
  160. ^ a b Pacepa, Ion Mihai (2007 yil 25-yanvar). "Moskvaning Vatikanga hujumi". National Review Online.
  161. ^ "Cherkov barchangizni chin dildan sevadi". Rorate-Caeli.blogspot.com. 1964 yil 5-yanvar.
  162. ^ a b Lapomarda, Vinsent A. (2005). Iezuitlar va uchinchi reyx (ikkinchi nashr). E. Mellen Press. 1-2 bet. ISBN  978-0-7734-6265-6.
  163. ^ Phayer (2000), p. xii – xiii.
  164. ^ Vudvord, Kennet L. (1999 yil 27 sentyabr). "XII Piusga qarshi ish". Newsweek.
  165. ^ a b Sanches (2002), p. 34.
  166. ^ a b Coppa, Frank J. (2006 yil 29 iyun). "XII Pius: nashrlar". Britannica entsiklopediyasi.
  167. ^ "Xudo uchun". Iqtisodchi. 2004 yil 9-dekabr.
  168. ^ Kornuell, Jon (2004). Qishda Pontifik: Yuhanno Pol II davridagi g'alaba va to'qnashuv. Ikki kun. p.193. ISBN  978-0-385-51484-2.
  169. ^ Kornuell, Jon (mart 2009). "Kitoblarni ko'rib chiqish: Gitlerning ruhoniylari: katolik ruhoniylari va milliy sotsializm, Kevin P. Spayser tomonidan". Cherkov tarixi: nasroniylik va madaniyat bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 78 (1): 235–237. doi:10.1017 / S0009640709000390.
  170. ^ Burli (2006), p. 282.
  171. ^ Dalin (2005).
  172. ^ a b Sadovski, Dennis (2010 yil 18 fevral). "Olimlar papadan Pius XII ning kanonizatsiyasini sekinlashtirishni so'rashmoqda". National Catholic Reporter. Katolik yangiliklar xizmati.
  173. ^ Bottum, Jozef; Dalin, Devid, nashr. (2004). Pius urushi: Pius XII tanqidchilariga javoblar. Leksington kitoblari. p. 7. ISBN  978-0-7391-5888-3.
  174. ^ Goldhagen (2002), 77, 89-betlar, bet. 481 fn. 94, 250-251 betlar.
  175. ^ Goldhagen (2002), p. 158.
  176. ^ Kerol, Jeyms (2002). Konstantinning qilichi: Cherkov va yahudiylar. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN  0-618-21908-0.
  177. ^ Vasiyatnoma (2000), p. 67.
  178. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000).
  179. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000), p. 2018-04-02 121 2.
  180. ^ a b Fogarti, Jerar P (9 dekabr 2000). Vatikan va Holokost. Dominikaning Tadqiqotlar uyiga taqdimot. Vashington
  181. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000), p. 4.
  182. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000), 4-8 betlar.
  183. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000), p. 4, savol # 1.
  184. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000), 8-10 betlar.
  185. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000), p. 8, savol # 28.
  186. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000), 10-11 betlar.
  187. ^ Yahudiy-nasroniy munosabatlari (2000), p. 10, savol # 42.
  188. ^ Radler, Melissa (2001 yil 24-iyul). "Vatikan Xolokost arxivlariga kirish huquqini bloklaydi". Quddus Post. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2016 yil 8 oktyabrda.
  189. ^ Pensieri die Pio XII, nota dela Card. Pietro Palazzini Vicenza, 1984 yil[to'liq iqtibos kerak ]
  190. ^ Jerusalem Post maqolasi[o'lik havola ]
  191. ^ a b v d Ng, Devid (2012 yil 2-iyul). "Isroilning Holokost muzeyi Papa Pius XII ishtirokidagi ko'rgazmani o'zgartirdi". Los Anjeles Tayms.
  192. ^ a b Novek, Myra (2012 yil 1-iyul). "Isroilning Holokost muzeyi Papa Piy XIIga nisbatan tanqidni yumshatmoqda". The New York Times.
  193. ^ "Isroil yodgorligi Pius matnini tuzatdi". Irish Times. Reuters. 2012 yil 2-iyul.
  194. ^ Segev, Tom (2012 yil 1-iyul). "Piokning Xolokostdagi roli ko'proq tekshirishga loyiqdir". Haaretz.
  195. ^ Randall, Gen (26 mart 2000 yil). "Papa muqaddas erga haj ziyoratini tugatdi". CNN.
  196. ^ a b Bokenkotter (2004), p. 484.
  197. ^ "Biz eslaymiz: Shoa haqida mulohaza". Yahudiylarning virtual kutubxonasi. 12 mart 1998 yil.
  198. ^ Papa Pius XII
  199. ^ Papa Benedikt XVI (2008 yil 19 sentyabr). "" Pavet yo'lni ochish "jamg'armasi tomonidan tashkil etilgan simpozium yakunida XVI avliyo Benediktning murojaatlari."". Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
  200. ^ "Vatikan o'limidan 50 yil o'tgach, XII Pyusning hayoti va ta'limotlarini eslaydi". Katolik yangiliklar agentligi. 17 iyun 2008 yil.
  201. ^ Donadio, Reychel (9 oktyabr 2008 yil). "Italiya: Papa Ikkinchi Jahon urushi paytida Piusning harakatlarini himoya qiladi". The New York Times. Sinod bahslari
  202. ^ Ejpress
  203. ^ Krupp, Gari (2009 yil 1-may). "Piusni ta'qib qilishni to'xtating - Ikkinchi jahon urushi pontifikiga" Gitler Papasi "deb nom berilgan, ammo u yahudiylarni qutqarish uchun ko'p ish qilgan". Nyu-York Daily News.
  204. ^ a b Vitello, Pol (2010 yil 7 mart). "Urush davridagi Papaning ashaddiy muxlisi bor: yahudiy ritsari". The New York Times.

Bibliografiya

Qo'shimcha o'qish

Tashqi havolalar